LpMike75
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1621
- Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
- Location: CT
- Status: offline
Universal Audio MK 610?
Anyone have experience with this mic pre? http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/LA610mk2/ For the price range it seems to have the best reviews for a tube pre. Of course there is the Manley TNT which has both a Tube and SS channels. Ideally if I only have one mic pre I would want diversity but at 2700 big ones the Manley is a little much. But if it saves me from buying two down the road.... http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/TNT Anyone have experience with either of these?
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/20 07:34:47
(permalink)
The LA 610mkII is not just a tube preamp it is a channel strip with some EQ and a great compressor. I make a point of this because the preamp is that weakest thing in that box. I have 2 of the 1st version and I love them. As a preamp though, they will provide a distinct harmonically rich flavor that may be way over the top for some things. They sound like a modern stereotype of a tube pre amp in a world where there are many tube preamps that have a much more transparent sound while still offering the desirable characteristic of tube circuits. I used one of mine for direct in bass the other day. It really shines on bass. I walked over plugged a bass in and played a song... and when I was done I knew I was done. I had it set to go and it just disappeared did its job and let me enjoy the patch. Honestly, I bought mine because I liked the compressors a whole bunch. I am glad to have them. best regards, mike
post edited by mike_mccue - 2012/02/20 07:59:22
|
DeeringAmps
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2614
- Joined: 2005/10/03 10:29:25
- Location: Seattle area
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/20 07:49:24
(permalink)
I have an original LA610 and the mkII, that's how much I like them. I also have the 6176. As Mike said the pre, the 610, is not exactly "transparent". HTH, T
Tom Deering Tascam FW-1884 User Resources Page Firewire "Legacy" Tutorial, Service Manual, Schematic, and Service Bulletins Win10x64 StudioCat Pro Studio Coffee Lake 8086k 32gb RAM RME UFX (Audio) Tascam FW-1884 (Control) in Win 10x64 Pro
|
Gaffpro
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 792
- Joined: 2004/05/10 03:42:07
- Location: Palm City, FL. / Nashville, TN.
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/20 07:51:35
(permalink)
I just bought a Solo 610...haven't used it yet, but it's supposed to be a dead ringer for Bill Putnam's tube console in the 60's......I would consider this a vintage sound, not modern....but I look forward to trying it out.......I'm cutting some material ala Wrecking Crew / Glen Campbell type stuff so I figured use the pre that they used. I really want the Apollo but don't know what the story is on the converters Vs an RME UFX or UCX
Dell Studio XPS intel i7860, 8 gigs dual ram, Sonar X2 (x64), Windows 7 RME UCX Yamaha NS10, Equator D5, JBL LSR 2325 monitors Vintech X73i, Great River ME-1NV, Joe Meek VC3Q preamps RNC 1773, DBX 163x, Joe Meek VC3Q compressors DBX 263x deesser Neumann U87, TLM 103, AKG 214, CAD E100s Peluso 2247SE AT4050 and 4051 Shure KSM27, SM7, SM57, and UnidyneIII (from the 60's) Other assorted mikes
|
LpMike75
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1621
- Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
- Location: CT
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/20 08:06:07
(permalink)
Thnanks for the feedback guys. Do you feel even with the gain very low it is still has a 'thick' tube coloration?
|
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31918
- Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/20 08:50:17
(permalink)
I think if you looked at it comparatively then yes, the preamp seems full and rich through it's range and when you get to the top it goes "splat" just like a tube can. If it was designed for more headroom, like a Pendulum Audio for example, it would start cleaner and slowly get full and rich and you'd probably never get to the "splat". If you are using it for the color it's a great tool. If you don't want the extra color... it's kinda there anyways. Just my opinion though... maybe others feel differently? best regards, mike
|
LpMike75
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1621
- Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
- Location: CT
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/20 09:11:59
(permalink)
|
LpMike75
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1621
- Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
- Location: CT
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/20 11:09:31
(permalink)
Well, it's ordered and on it's way from Sweetwater. Guess I will see how well I like it when it gets here.
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/20 11:11:56
(permalink)
Mike, +1 for what Mike (the other Mike here) says. I was just at a big label producer's place last week and he uses LA for all his bass and says it is always just right. But that is just about the only thing he uses it for. However, he has lots of other toys and favorite chains. The most flexible chain I've come across (and I ain't saying I've used them all, or even a majority) is the RND Portico II channel strip. Modern Neve premap - which is to say a big transformer sound, clean but not superclean. However, if you want a more vintage sound it has a knob and two position "silk" switch to add some and then some more harmonic saturation, while you can dial it in the amount w/ the knob. We played w/ that feature at a studio and could pretty well match the sound of the BAE (1073 Neve clone). It also pretty well matched a pendelum the studio owner uses for vox most of the time. On rich sources like the distorted guitar it was really a blast. Add a 4 band EQ w/ HP (again, clean but big) and a comp w/ feed forward and back modes and built-in parellel knob and a de-esser and you have just about everything you need in a channel strip. It is about twice as expensive as the LA, but if you are recording your songs one instrument at a time it is hard to buy something more flexible w/o getting a couple of separate modules. One the downside, it is about twice as expensive as many other good channel strips and you dont' get multiple preamps for recording at once or using on your bus output. Ah, where's the lottery when you need it! @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
Beagle
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 50621
- Joined: 2006/03/29 11:03:12
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/20 11:29:32
(permalink)
mike_mccue I think if you looked at it comparatively then yes, the preamp seems full and rich through it's range and when you get to the top it goes "splat" just like a tube can. If it was designed for more headroom, like a Pendulum Audio for example, it would start cleaner and slowly get full and rich and you'd probably never get to the "splat". If you are using it for the color it's a great tool. If you don't want the extra color... it's kinda there anyways. Just my opinion though... maybe others feel differently? best regards, mike I agree with Mike on this. the LA 610 (and 710) are going to color your sound if you use it. We did a shootout of some mic pres at a meeting of our DFW Sonar User's Group about a year ago and one of the members brought the LA 610. Personally it was my favorite of the ones we tested and we tested it on acoustic guitar and vocals. I don't remember all of the models we tested, maybe AT does (he was there, too), I do remember we tested a Grace m501 (same thing as an m101 but in the 500 series format), a GAP PRE 73 (original, not the MKII) a focusrite ISA ONE and that's all I remember. the GRACE was my 2nd favorite. when you say "transparent" - I think of the grace. it was just pure transparent gain. no color. if you don't want color - that's what you want (I've also heard that the true systems pres are the same) - this is probably my next purchase! The ISA ONE was decent, just not my favorite. the GAP PRE 73 - definitely colored - this is a transformer coloration modeled by the 1073 Neve. I was the one who brought it. but I have since sold it, it wasn't what I was looking for. the LA-610 - the compressor is absolutely excellent! the mic pre is really good, too, IMO. If I had the money, I'd buy one!
post edited by Beagle - 2012/02/20 11:34:37
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/20 14:52:28
(permalink)
The RND was there too, I think, and maybe the stock moto preamp, too. Almost any high-end pre or channel is going to sound good, although one might be better for this or that or work better with your voice. Still, it is a matter of degree, not kind. Once you get to a certain point, the mic and placement is going to have a bigger impact. And a bad room. One of the things about most (if not all) of the higher-end preamps is more gain, which often gives you more room tone in the recording, which shows up resonances, standing waves, etc. Listening straight off my computer on $10 speakers I really couldn't tell much if any difference of our shootout - which should tell you something for many finished listening enviroments. The subtle differences are blurred, if not lost. But that doesn't mean that well-recorded sources ain't important - it makes it easier to mix and get separation of instruments, which does translate to airbuds etc. If you are serious about capture, a nice preamp is a real help, whether it is a $300 Gap that you can play w/ the input/output transformer or the straight-wire of a Grace or a $4000 channelstrip w/ all the fixings. @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
DeeringAmps
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2614
- Joined: 2005/10/03 10:29:25
- Location: Seattle area
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/20 22:29:58
(permalink)
Tom Deering Tascam FW-1884 User Resources Page Firewire "Legacy" Tutorial, Service Manual, Schematic, and Service Bulletins Win10x64 StudioCat Pro Studio Coffee Lake 8086k 32gb RAM RME UFX (Audio) Tascam FW-1884 (Control) in Win 10x64 Pro
|
LpMike75
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1621
- Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
- Location: CT
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/21 01:21:38
(permalink)
I think the compressor is what finally pushed me over the edge. I really cant wait to hear how my main mic mixes with it (SHURE KSM 44a). I'll post my results when I get a chance for any interested parties
|
jcschild
Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3409
- Joined: 2003/11/08 00:20:10
- Location: Kentucky y'all
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/21 09:07:49
(permalink)
hope you didnt pay more than $1350
Scott ADK Home of the Kentucky Fried DAW!
|
LpMike75
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1621
- Joined: 2009/10/04 11:50:50
- Location: CT
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/21 09:15:27
(permalink)
I didn't find anything lower than 1599 new. I dont buy used gear unless it's an insane deal. I would always rather spend a couple hundred dollars extra for new with a warranty and tech support (if needed). So many of my friends claimed they have gotten crazy deal off of Ebay on used gear but I have yet to find any true "insane deals". Most used gear is still fairly close to the original price, I never find it worth it to take a chance on when I could just pay a little extra for new. Now if I found a used one for 500....that would be something!
|
jcschild
Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3409
- Joined: 2003/11/08 00:20:10
- Location: Kentucky y'all
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/21 11:20:40
(permalink)
ummm $1350 is what you should have paid for NEW... next time you might want to ask around before buying from SW.
Scott ADK Home of the Kentucky Fried DAW!
|
DeeringAmps
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2614
- Joined: 2005/10/03 10:29:25
- Location: Seattle area
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/21 21:38:15
(permalink)
mybad? I should have said something. I'm on the road and my internet time is very limited. I knew I missed something... Sorry to both of you. T
Tom Deering Tascam FW-1884 User Resources Page Firewire "Legacy" Tutorial, Service Manual, Schematic, and Service Bulletins Win10x64 StudioCat Pro Studio Coffee Lake 8086k 32gb RAM RME UFX (Audio) Tascam FW-1884 (Control) in Win 10x64 Pro
|
jcschild
Max Output Level: -41 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3409
- Joined: 2003/11/08 00:20:10
- Location: Kentucky y'all
- Status: offline
Re:Universal Audio MK 610?
2012/02/22 09:17:48
(permalink)
Scott ADK Home of the Kentucky Fried DAW!
|