Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9

Author
ioneskylab
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2
  • Joined: 2016/08/01 15:24:41
  • Status: offline
2016/08/01 16:19:29 (permalink)

Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9

Hello, I am a long time user of Cakewalk, I have a bunch of project files in Cakewalk Pro Audio 9.  What would be the best way to upgrade to a recent version of cakewalk/sonar.  I basically want to retain the tracks in each project plus the velocity/pan/envelope settings (less concerned with the effects settings)
#1

10 Replies Related Threads

    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re: Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9 2016/08/01 16:26:00 (permalink)
    You're in luck. Sonar can read Pro Audio files as native with no issues at all. So you upgrade to Sonar Platinum with no worries. WRK files are supported.

    Best
    John
    #2
    ioneskylab
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2
    • Joined: 2016/08/01 15:24:41
    • Status: offline
    Re: Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9 2016/08/01 16:27:42 (permalink)
    awesome, thanks for the quick reply, John.
    #3
    Zargg
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10666
    • Joined: 2014/09/28 04:20:14
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re: Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9 2016/08/01 16:29:20 (permalink)
    Hi, and welcome to this forum. I recently opened projects made both in Cakewalk PA 9, and SONAR XL 2.2, without a problem in latest SONAR Platinum. The only issue was missing plugins. You will have to locate the audio files, to be able to use the project. (IIRC it was a single audio folder in the older versions) You could demo the new versions, but I do not believe they allow saving.
    All the best.

    Ken Nilsen
    Zargg
    BBZ
    Win 10 Pro X64, Cakewalk by Bandlab, SPlat X64, AMD AM3+ fx-8320, 16Gb RAM, RME Ucx (+ ARC), Tascam FW 1884, M-Audio Keystation 61es, *AKAI MPK Pro 25, *Softube Console1, Alesis DM6 USB, Maschine MkII
    Laptop setup: Win 10 X64, i5 2.4ghz, 8gb RAM, 320gb 7200 RPM HD, Focusrite Solo, + *
     
    #4
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re: Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9 2016/08/01 16:49:26 (permalink)
    Right, welcome to the forum Ioneskylab. You may have a shock when you open Sonar.  This forum can help you through the future shock you may experience. Sonar may be very strange to you but I strongly believe you will like it a lot once you get use to it.   

    Best
    John
    #5
    timidi
    Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5449
    • Joined: 2006/04/11 12:55:15
    • Location: SE Florida
    • Status: offline
    Re: Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9 2016/08/01 19:29:50 (permalink)
    You will have issues with the *.wrk files. Not deal breakers, but, there will be anomalies. My advice would be to copy and paste (or export/import) the track waves into a new project (with identical tempo) in your new choice of DAW. Doing it this way seems to clean the data so to speak.

    ASUS P8P67, i7-2600K, CORSAIR 16GB, HIS 5450, 3 Samsung SSD 850, Win7 64, RME AIO.
     
    https://timbowman.bandcamp.com/releases
     
    #6
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re: Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9 2016/08/01 19:49:06 (permalink)
    I have a lot of wrk files and have not had any problem with them. 

    Best
    John
    #7
    zoffmeister
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 183
    • Joined: 2004/05/07 07:58:14
    • Location: UK
    • Status: offline
    Re: Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9 2016/08/01 20:39:16 (permalink)
    Wow! Pro Audio 9. I hope your projects survive their transition into the 21st century.

    SONAR Platinum 1607, Windows 10 Pro, i7 6700K 16GB Ram 3.4Ghz
    256GB SSD C: Drive, 525GB SSD VI's, 2TB Audio Drive
      
    Interface: UA Apollo Firewire, UAD2 Quad PCIe
    Mackie Control, C4 and two extenders. 
    Studiologic SL990 Pro keyboard controller
    #8
    timidi
    Max Output Level: -21 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5449
    • Joined: 2006/04/11 12:55:15
    • Location: SE Florida
    • Status: offline
    Re: Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9 2016/08/01 21:02:25 (permalink)
    John,
    It's been awhile but, I remember something with volume offsets or something, among other weirdnesses.

    ASUS P8P67, i7-2600K, CORSAIR 16GB, HIS 5450, 3 Samsung SSD 850, Win7 64, RME AIO.
     
    https://timbowman.bandcamp.com/releases
     
    #9
    chuckebaby
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13146
    • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
    • Status: offline
    Re: Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9 2016/08/01 21:09:47 (permalink)
    I went from pro audio 9.0 to sonar 8 and it was a big jump as far as features and learning curve.
    After sonar 8 I've gone through every single X series (sonar x1 thru platinum)
    and its been well, well , worth it.
     
    check out some videos on you tube and if you can swing it, grab a groove 3 video (Sonar platinum)
    but I believe between you tube and cakewalk(also has a great stock of videos on site)
    start here:
    https://www.cakewalk.com/CakeTV/SONAR-University
     
    you will be pleasantly surprised how much your world will change.
    The problem with pro audio 9 for me was I had trouble running it in windows 7 (ya I tried to open it)
    even with compatibility settings it was missing some features.
     
    but all your old projects should work fine but I don't need to tell you that because these other guys
    have covered that nicely.
    Welcome to the best forum on the web.
     
    post edited by chuckebaby - 2016/08/01 21:31:51

    Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
    Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
    Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
       
    #10
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re: Upgrade from Cakewalk ProAudio 9 2016/08/01 21:22:01 (permalink)
    timidi
    John,
    It's been awhile but, I remember something with volume offsets or something, among other weirdnesses.


    I can't say. My wrk files were simple. Many have automation. None had any offset issues. Not having plugins I used in those days is the only issue. But not an insurmountable one. In my case they just open and often ask for missing plugins but thats pretty much it. 
     
    I have noticed some users seem to have all sorts of problems with not just wrk files but all CW files. Why this is I don't know. All I can say is I haven't. I have hundreds of them. 

    Best
    John
    #11
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1