sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
I have a mental block when it comes to expanders, I don't know why. Therefore my eyes glazed over reading this, even though it looks like it might be of interest. Can anyone tell me whether it's useful or nonsense? http://noisefloorav.com/w.-i-use-expanders-on-dis/
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
Sheanes
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 684
- Joined: 2013/01/30 10:31:11
- Location: Zjwame, Netherlands
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/01/27 21:17:48
(permalink)
Hi James,
Firstly I'm not sure what would sound better, the raw big portion of noise, or the compressed smaller portion.
Sure you hear less noise, but it might be the rest of the mix suffers from the compressed portion of noise / fighting to cut through it.....this is something I'm not sure of but just thought it could happen.
Then you would need to add an expander which could give you latency.
And then maybe that noise would actually be nice in the mix, the last thing that would be a problem in my personal mixing (if that ever took off) would probably be noise.
Probably DAWS would have such a function if anything like this noise reduction would be good, I'd say.
But it's always good to read and think about things, thanks for sharing too.
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/01/27 22:44:18
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby brandonshire 2017/02/18 10:29:05
I think his goal in reducing the noise was to stop the amount going into the amp sim.
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
tlw
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2567
- Joined: 2008/10/11 22:06:32
- Location: West Midlands, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/01/28 10:35:37
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Beepster 2017/02/04 14:32:36
Best place to put an expander/gate is immediately after the guitar. Much of the noise that comes from amps or amp sims is the original guitar hum/buzz that's now amplified and the potentially negative consequences of using a gate/expander are much less if the noise floor is as low as possible rather than trying to gate out a much higher noise floor post effects.
Keeping the amp gain low can help a great deal with noise, even if effects between guitar and amp are a bit noisy. Which is one reason why many guitarists prefer a clean or "edge of breakup" amp then use pedals to get fuzz/distortion/compression.
The Boss NS2 noise suppressor pedal is an expander which takes things further by having a loop that you put noise-generating pedals in and the loop is only open when there's enough signal at the pedal input from the guitar to open the gate. Set up properly it can block noise quite effectively, though dynamics and sustain might suffer a bit, especially if the noise floor is high enough to compete with the guitar signal as sustained notes fade out. Then the choice becomes live with the noise vs. reduce the available sustain but also reduce the noise vs. rethink gain staging and try and find a less noisy order to put pedals/fx in.
If using an amp sim, I'd track without a gate/expander then insert one as the first processor in the track if it's needed afterwards. That way any potential latency increase is irrelevant.
Noise is not good unless it's an artistic decision to have it. It can really make a mess of a mix because it restricts what you can do if you don't want a mix that's full of noise. There's a reason why good amp, effects and mixer/preamp designers put a lot of effort into designing circuits that have as little self-induced noise as possible.
Pete Cornish's website offers some useful thoughts on why a high noise floor is unacceptable, especially if it's going to be amplified by a big PA.
Sonar Platinum 64bit, Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit, I7 3770K Ivybridge, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte Z77-D3H m/board, ATI 7750 graphics+ 1GB RAM, 2xIntel 520 series 220GB SSDs, 1 TB Samsung F3 + 1 TB WD HDDs, Seasonic fanless 460W psu, RME Fireface UFX, Focusrite Octopre. Assorted real synths, guitars, mandolins, diatonic accordions, percussion, fx and other stuff.
|
jb101
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2011/12/04 05:26:10
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/03 20:21:41
(permalink)
I use the PC4KExpander/Gate on problematic guitar tracks, first in the chain.
I find setting it to expander much more effective than gate. It reduces noise but reduces the risk of artifacts such as chattering.
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/04 15:54:45
(permalink)
Expanders can be excellent in many ways. Like a slightly higher noise background with a vocal track. But noise from a guitar being cleaned up is a great way to ensure all the quiet parts or no guitar playing at all then the noise level of the rest of the processing is still be low. I have got rack mounted expander that is easier to set.
And yes even a slightly noisy signal will still pop the noise through once the expander is at unity gain but the signal will most often mask any noise at that point.
Chattering can actually be reduced to almost nothing by adjusting any gate hold times if they are available and release times too. Having an expander close its release portion smoothly can be important. Chattering happens because the expander shuts off fast and then bounces back letting any tiny amplitude increases open the expander again etc..
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
Chandler
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 477
- Joined: 2012/11/02 08:56:21
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/06 20:34:12
(permalink)
I was using spectral tools to clean up my DIs, but it might be better to use that as well as an expander. I'll have to test it, but it might be better to have 2 things doing just a little work than 1 doing everything.
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/06 21:34:01
(permalink)
Chandler
I was using spectral tools to clean up my DIs, but it might be better to use that as well as an expander. I'll have to test it, but it might be better to have 2 things doing just a little work than 1 doing everything. This is a good approach and in a way this is what I was doing. I had to record some super quiet voicers in my Melbourne studio (relaxation) and the noise outside was just a little loud for such things. At first I started removing the unwanted noise using a noise reduction approach, that worked OK but took time etc.. Then I just ended up setting a downward expander (hardware) really well just before the A to D in my setup. I found I was able to get virtually noiseless results this way. Sure the noise was still there with the spoken word but it got masked rather nicely in the end. You tend to notice noise when the playing has stopped or the voice has gone silent much more. Setting up an expander after the guitar and before any processing I would imagine could have a similar result. Nip it in the bud so to speak. And hopefully any buzz etc that is there will be masked by the main sound when it is present.
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/11 14:09:49
(permalink)
So what about just manually editing out the noise between phrases? Is that more common? I may try out that Boss NS2 because I do have a problem with a noisy Telecaster.
I have to say though, sometimes I quite like that noise in between phrases. I'm working on a track now that has a section of just drums with some intermittent guitar phrases, and the buzzing in between phrases kind of adds to the whole atmosphere and creates more of a "live" sound.
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
Jeff Evans
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5139
- Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
- Location: Ballarat, Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/11 17:33:27
(permalink)
Of course it is all a creative decision. Once you start really cleaning things up then the sound gets to be more studio like I guess. But in some situations downward expanders can be a godsend too. You can use them on toms say but then you start losing the spill effect which you may actually be after.
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
|
brandonshire
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6
- Joined: 2016/10/16 23:05:14
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/18 10:29:27
(permalink)
sharke
I think his goal in reducing the noise was to stop the amount going into the amp sim.
Exactly. The point of my article is to reduce the amount of noise going into the amp sim, nothing more.
|
brandonshire
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6
- Joined: 2016/10/16 23:05:14
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/18 10:33:51
(permalink)
Sheanes
Hi James,
Firstly I'm not sure what would sound better, the raw big portion of noise, or the compressed smaller portion.
Sure you hear less noise, but it might be the rest of the mix suffers from the compressed portion of noise / fighting to cut through it.....this is something I'm not sure of but just thought it could happen.
Then you would need to add an expander which could give you latency.
And then maybe that noise would actually be nice in the mix, the last thing that would be a problem in my personal mixing (if that ever took off) would probably be noise.
Probably DAWS would have such a function if anything like this noise reduction would be good, I'd say.
But it's always good to read and think about things, thanks for sharing too.
This doesn't get rid of the noise, it merely turns it down to a more manageable level. That said, it's subjective. If the noise works for your song, use it. I love noisy rock. The amp noise in "Hey Man Nice Shot" adds to the feel of the track. But with a lot of amp sims, if you're using a cheaper interface and a guitar that's not shielded, the noise can be intensified. This is merely a tool to help you manage it. Regarding latency, I'm not concerned about latency during mixing. If I've got my DI already tracked, I can put the expander on and shape my tone for the mix I'm working on. Regarding noise reduction tools, those don't sound good on DI's in my experience. I'm not talking about 60 cycle hum or anything like that, but rather just typical guitar hum. That comes from compressing the signal at the amp stage, which is what a distorted amp does. It's a distorted compressor. When you compress like that, it brings up the noise floor. If you don't want that, use an expander to push it down before the amp.
|
brandonshire
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6
- Joined: 2016/10/16 23:05:14
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/18 10:36:33
(permalink)
sharke
So what about just manually editing out the noise between phrases? Is that more common? I may try out that Boss NS2 because I do have a problem with a noisy Telecaster.
I have to say though, sometimes I quite like that noise in between phrases. I'm working on a track now that has a section of just drums with some intermittent guitar phrases, and the buzzing in between phrases kind of adds to the whole atmosphere and creates more of a "live" sound.
If you've recorded an amp, and there's a ton of noise, manually edit it out. No big deal. However, if you push your noise floor lower before the amp you won't have as much noise to manage that way. Hence the expander. Regarding noise between phrases, this doesn't get rid of the noise. It just turns it down. It's still there, and if there's a part where the noise may be desired you can always automate the expander into bypass for that section. Remember this is something you can do in post production after the DI is recorded.
|
brandonshire
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6
- Joined: 2016/10/16 23:05:14
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/18 10:38:37
(permalink)
Chandler
I was using spectral tools to clean up my DIs, but it might be better to use that as well as an expander. I'll have to test it, but it might be better to have 2 things doing just a little work than 1 doing everything.
I've never had good luck with spectral tools for cleaning up DI's. They always seem to remove frequencies that make the guitar DI sound more natural. For me, the expander moving the noise floor much lower sounds more natural. It does nothing to the spectrum of the guitar DI, and with the threshold set low enough it's only going to push down when you're not playing.
|
brandonshire
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6
- Joined: 2016/10/16 23:05:14
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/18 10:40:21
(permalink)
By the way, thanks for posting my article here. Great discussion, and I'm happy to see my thoughts being shared around. Kudos!
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/19 22:29:28
(permalink)
No worries, nice blog by the way. X Theme?
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
brandonshire
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6
- Joined: 2016/10/16 23:05:14
- Status: offline
Re: Using expanders to reduce DI noise going into amp sims etc
2017/02/19 22:34:37
(permalink)
sharke
No worries, nice blog by the way. X Theme?
yup. X-Theme. Thank you by the way!
|