Using your video card for processing effect?

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
DigiBiu
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1053
  • Joined: 2003/11/27 01:47:37
  • Location: Maurice, Louisiana
  • Status: offline
2009/10/05 10:55:35 (permalink)

Using your video card for processing effect?

Anyone see this? there is an article about it in this months SOS
 
http://www.nilsschneider.de/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=26
post edited by Willy Jones [Cakewalk] - 2009/10/05 16:13:17

 
http://digitalbayoustudios.com/
https://soundcloud.com/digibiu
David Stuckey
Sonar X3 Producer ,Windows 7 64bit ,6G Ram, Quad Core 2.6,3 1 UAD 2 card, 4 UAD-1 Cards, 2 Dell 24" LCD, ADAM ANF10, Avantones, Crown Power Amp, Great River ME-1, UA Solo/610, Distressor,Presonus ADL600,, RNC, RNLA, 2 PBC-6a, JoeMeek MC2, ART Pro Channel, Yamaha MO8,Korg Triton,M-Audio Keystation Pro 88, Custom Shop Fender Twin, 76 Randall Tube Amp, Custom Blue Runner Tube Amp,
Lynx Aurora 8 FW
Apogee AD8000 SE
MixedLogic M24 Control Surface
Yamaha Pro Mix 01
#1

5 Replies Related Threads
    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:USING YOUR VIDEO CARD FOR PROCESSING EFFECT? 2009/10/05 13:47:08 (permalink)
    An interesting concept. I'd be reluctant to employ any effect that relied on a particular piece of hardware, unless it was a dedicated DSP card like a UAD2. I'd also have some reservations about possible bus contention and possible issues with automatic delay compensation. And it'll probably only handle a single audio channel, thus depriving the user of the main benefit of hardware DSP, which is the ability to have CPU-intensive effects on multiple channels. But the concept is certainly interesting. Let us know how it works for you!


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #2
    Sickvision
    Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 841
    • Joined: 2009/05/03 22:28:59
    • Location: BOSTON, MASS
    • Status: offline
    Re:USING YOUR VIDEO CARD FOR PROCESSING EFFECT? 2009/10/05 14:08:44 (permalink)
    Sounds Crazy . im with flip::

    SONARX1-64 WIN 7-64 DELTA-1010lt 
    ASUS990 6 core with delta
    2ssd drives 16 gigs RAM
    BX5a monitorsYAMAHA 4416

    http://soundcloud.com/american-metal/high-on-the-wire-pre
    #3
    DigiBiu
    Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1053
    • Joined: 2003/11/27 01:47:37
    • Location: Maurice, Louisiana
    • Status: offline
    Re:USING YOUR VIDEO CARD FOR PROCESSING EFFECT? 2009/10/05 14:24:52 (permalink)
    I'm not gonna do this, I just thought it was interesting

     
    http://digitalbayoustudios.com/
    https://soundcloud.com/digibiu
    David Stuckey
    Sonar X3 Producer ,Windows 7 64bit ,6G Ram, Quad Core 2.6,3 1 UAD 2 card, 4 UAD-1 Cards, 2 Dell 24" LCD, ADAM ANF10, Avantones, Crown Power Amp, Great River ME-1, UA Solo/610, Distressor,Presonus ADL600,, RNC, RNLA, 2 PBC-6a, JoeMeek MC2, ART Pro Channel, Yamaha MO8,Korg Triton,M-Audio Keystation Pro 88, Custom Shop Fender Twin, 76 Randall Tube Amp, Custom Blue Runner Tube Amp,
    Lynx Aurora 8 FW
    Apogee AD8000 SE
    MixedLogic M24 Control Surface
    Yamaha Pro Mix 01
    #4
    UnderTow
    Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3848
    • Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
    • Status: offline
    Re:USING YOUR VIDEO CARD FOR PROCESSING EFFECT? 2009/10/05 14:38:22 (permalink)
    bitflipper


     it'll probably only handle a single audio channel, thus depriving the user of the main benefit of hardware DSP, which is the ability to have CPU-intensive effects on multiple channels.

    Unless you have one of these: http://www.nvidia.com/obj...al_supercomputing.html



    UnderTow
    #5
    fresh101
    Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 772
    • Joined: 2004/01/12 15:15:59
    • Status: offline
    Re:USING YOUR VIDEO CARD FOR PROCESSING EFFECT? 2009/10/05 15:25:56 (permalink)
    UnderTow


    bitflipper


    it'll probably only handle a single audio channel, thus depriving the user of the main benefit of hardware DSP, which is the ability to have CPU-intensive effects on multiple channels.

    Unless you have one of these: http://www.nvidia.com/object/personal_supercomputing.html



    UnderTow

    I posted a thread on this a while back. The Cuda technology seems really promising for the future. Cakewalk has stayed ahead of the curve lately when it come to new technologies. I wonder if they have considered cuda compatibility
    #6
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1