Rick5
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 32
- Joined: 2010/11/14 17:53:10
- Status: offline
VS-100 Sampling Rate
I have a VS-100 who's sampling rate is 24bit/96kHz. Thinking of adding an A/D D/A converter (RME ADI-2) to my chain. The RME ADI-2 has a sampling rate of 24bit/196kHz. Would I be losing something sonically because the VS-100 can only max at 96kHz?
|
codamedia
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1185
- Joined: 2005/01/24 09:58:10
- Location: Winnipeg Canada
- Status: offline
Re:VS-100 Sampling Rate
2011/11/22 09:23:54
(permalink)
If this question was asked in the Sonar X1 thread it would start a debate that goes on for days - LOL! In my opinion - no, you are not losing any quality, nothing the ear will notice anyway. The ear cannot hear anything beyond 44.1 (which is a 20K limit on top end). However, there are harmonics above that which can have an affect on their counter parts lower than 20K. So in theory a higher resolution can sound better - that doesn't mean you will hear it. Recording in 24 bit (rather than 16bit) is far more important than recording at a higher sample rate than 44.1. (just for the record, I usually record at 48k/24bit which is the audio quality of DVD) That is just my opinion - and should be taken as such :) EDIT TO ADD: In case you are not aware of this, - Sample Rate is directly related to Frequency Range (20hz - 20K is 44.1)
- BIT Rate is directly related to dynamic range (headroom)
post edited by codamedia - 2011/11/22 10:18:39
Don't fix it in the mix ... Fix it in the take! Desktop: Win 7 Pro 64 Bit , ASUS MB w/Intel Chipset, INTEL Q9300 Quad Core, 2.5 GHz, 8 GB RAM, ATI 5450 Video Laptop: Windows 7 Pro, i5, 8 Gig Ram Hardware: Presonus FP10 (Firepod), FaderPort, M-Audio Axiom 49, Mackie 1202 VLZ, POD X3 Live, Variax 600, etc... etc...
|
oy5t3h
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7
- Joined: 2011/11/22 09:54:34
- Status: offline
Re:VS-100 Sampling Rate
2011/11/22 10:08:53
(permalink)
It's not quite true to say that "20Hz-20kHz = 44.1" The Nyquist Theorem (google it!) states that the sampling rate must be twice the maximum frequency being sampled, so (theoretically) only a 40kHz sampling rate is required to sample an audio signal with a maximum frequency of 20kHz. However any frequencies above 20kHz in the input signal are not lost - they are mangled and come out below 20kHz in the output - e.g. a signal of 22kHz being sampled at 40kHz would be "reflected" about the 20kHz bandwidth limit, and come out at 18kHz in the output. So the input signal is filtered with the steepest possible filter above 20kHz. In practice, the 44.1kHz sampling rate was chosen so that the maximum frequency of 22.05kHz gives a bit of room for the filter to work between 20kHz and 22.05kHz. If you think about, though, 20kHz - 22kHz is only 1/10th of an octave, so a 24dB/oct filter would only reduce signals at 22kHz by 2.4dB, which would still leave the artifacts clearly audible in the output, so MUCh steeper filters are used, which inevitably introduce distortions in the audible frequency range. So it's a good idea to have a sampling rate higher than 44.1kHz. Not just because it allows the frequency range to be extended, but also because it allows any filtering artificats to be moved further out of the audible spectrum. Whether you can hear the difference between 96kHz and 192kHz is another matter altogether, though. I suspect that the quality of A/D converters and filters are FAR, FAR more important than the sample rate at those sort of numbers.
|
codamedia
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1185
- Joined: 2005/01/24 09:58:10
- Location: Winnipeg Canada
- Status: offline
Re:VS-100 Sampling Rate
2011/11/22 10:37:13
(permalink)
oy5t3h: If you really read my post I think you would have figured out that I know/understand the theory behind all this. I was simply stating it in general terms that are a little easier to understand. The industry decided that Red Book Audio would use 44.1K because it can handle 20 - 20K. That is not optimal (nor precise), and I never said it was - it is just a general understanding (without all the theory). Please don't tell me to "google it" You may not have meant anything by that - but I find it a little insulting.
Don't fix it in the mix ... Fix it in the take! Desktop: Win 7 Pro 64 Bit , ASUS MB w/Intel Chipset, INTEL Q9300 Quad Core, 2.5 GHz, 8 GB RAM, ATI 5450 Video Laptop: Windows 7 Pro, i5, 8 Gig Ram Hardware: Presonus FP10 (Firepod), FaderPort, M-Audio Axiom 49, Mackie 1202 VLZ, POD X3 Live, Variax 600, etc... etc...
|
oy5t3h
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7
- Joined: 2011/11/22 09:54:34
- Status: offline
Re:VS-100 Sampling Rate
2011/11/23 10:39:02
(permalink)
Sorry if I caused offence. It wasn't obvious to me from your response that you understood more than you were letting on. And you really shouldn't be insulted by advice to look things up on Google, there's far more information there than you, I or any other mortal will ever know!
|
codamedia
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1185
- Joined: 2005/01/24 09:58:10
- Location: Winnipeg Canada
- Status: offline
Re:VS-100 Sampling Rate
2011/11/23 18:30:28
(permalink)
oy5t3h Sorry if I caused offence. It wasn't obvious to me from your response that you understood more than you were letting on. And you really shouldn't be insulted by advice to look things up on Google, there's far more information there than you, I or any other mortal will ever know! In reality, I think I was just in a foul mood yesterday Sorry about that! I don't usually snap at anyone on the forums, and you didn't deserve it!
Don't fix it in the mix ... Fix it in the take! Desktop: Win 7 Pro 64 Bit , ASUS MB w/Intel Chipset, INTEL Q9300 Quad Core, 2.5 GHz, 8 GB RAM, ATI 5450 Video Laptop: Windows 7 Pro, i5, 8 Gig Ram Hardware: Presonus FP10 (Firepod), FaderPort, M-Audio Axiom 49, Mackie 1202 VLZ, POD X3 Live, Variax 600, etc... etc...
|
Rick5
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 32
- Joined: 2010/11/14 17:53:10
- Status: offline
Re:VS-100 Sampling Rate
2011/11/26 23:13:31
(permalink)
Thanks everyone for your help!
|