d3d
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 21
- Joined: 2006/02/16 16:54:54
- Status: offline
Waves 32 bit are thay compatible with latest sonar Platinum ?
after installing they open but are stuttering on what ever track they are on .... any help please ?
|
Slugbaby
Max Output Level: -33.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4172
- Joined: 2004/10/01 13:57:37
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Status: offline
Re: Waves 32 bit are thay compatible with latest sonar Platinum ?
2017/05/03 18:25:18
(permalink)
My version of SPlat is about 4 months old, but i have no issues with Waves 32-bit plugins.
Which plugins are you using? It sounds like your buffer setting may need to be increased - stuttering is often a case of overtaxing your PC. LP plugins, and other synths can often push this quickly.
|
d3d
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 21
- Joined: 2006/02/16 16:54:54
- Status: offline
Re: Waves 32 bit are thay compatible with latest sonar Platinum ?
2017/05/03 23:30:57
(permalink)
I'm using the Gold bundle I'll check buffer tomorrow and answer back
Thanks
|
d3d
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 21
- Joined: 2006/02/16 16:54:54
- Status: offline
Re: Waves 32 bit are thay compatible with latest sonar Platinum ?
2017/05/04 15:56:47
(permalink)
Also I'm using a brand new custom built ADK system Processor: Intel Core i7 6700 Skylake 3.4 Ghz (turbo 4GHz) Quad 8 meg cache , Microsoft Windows Professional 10 64 Bit OEM, RAM: 8 Gigs (2x 4 Gig) DDR4 2666 1.25V
Thanks Dave
|
Lynn
Max Output Level: -14 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6117
- Joined: 2003/11/12 18:36:16
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re: Waves 32 bit are thay compatible with latest sonar Platinum ?
2017/05/04 16:20:52
(permalink)
Why are you using 32 bit plugs? Does the Gold bundle not come in a 64 bit version? If you're using Splat in 64 bits you should be using 64 bit plugs.
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Waves 32 bit are thay compatible with latest sonar Platinum ?
2017/05/04 16:26:40
(permalink)
That would be my question. In the case where one is stuck using 32bit plug-ins running a 32bit host is the better solution. Both 32 and 64bit SONAR may be installed on the same machine and may help while transitioning to 64bit.
|
d3d
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 21
- Joined: 2006/02/16 16:54:54
- Status: offline
Re: Waves 32 bit are thay compatible with latest sonar Platinum ?
2017/05/04 22:22:56
(permalink)
Prior machine .... just got the brand new system I also have old T- Racks but havent tried them yet
|
Lynn
Max Output Level: -14 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6117
- Joined: 2003/11/12 18:36:16
- Location: Kansas City, MO
- Status: offline
Re: Waves 32 bit are thay compatible with latest sonar Platinum ?
2017/05/04 23:13:02
(permalink)
Check for updates to your software. They should be free to a registered owner. Good luck, I've been using an ADK desktop since 2009, and it's still going strong.
|
Slugbaby
Max Output Level: -33.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4172
- Joined: 2004/10/01 13:57:37
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Status: offline
Re: Waves 32 bit are thay compatible with latest sonar Platinum ?
2017/05/08 13:18:50
(permalink)
d3d
Also I'm using a brand new custom built ADK system Processor: Intel Core i7 6700 Skylake 3.4 Ghz (turbo 4GHz) Quad 8 meg cache , Microsoft Windows Professional 10 64 Bit OEM, RAM: 8 Gigs (2x 4 Gig) DDR4 2666 1.25V
Thanks Dave
IIRC, the Gold Bundle is a bunch of individual VSTs. Some may tax your system. If you're using everything that Waves lists in the Gold Bundle, you'll definitely be bogging down your 8Gb of RAM. Your best bet would be to buy more RAM (i've got 16 and almost never get the stutters). Otherwise, increase your buffer settings. This adds a little delay to the processing, so that the VSTs don't have to react so quickly. Increasing the buffer will make it harder to record live instruments, which is the trade-off. So minimize the processing when you're recording, and lower the buffer. Then, when you're using Synths or mixing, add the VSTs at that point and increase the buffer to accommodate.
|