iRelevant
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 430
- Joined: 2017/10/25 21:14:48
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ? [Solved]
I'm trying to set up a 32 bit version of SPLAT on a dedicated system (Actually it's a win7x64-bit system ... but it's reserved for 32-bit VST's and Apps only). Having a real hard time. Are anyone else actually using a 32-bit version of SPLAT, and if so which release do you use, with with what OS ? - Sven
post edited by iRelevant - 2018/05/15 15:11:41
|
msmcleod
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 920
- Joined: 2004/01/27 07:15:30
- Location: Scotland
- Status: offline
Re: What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ?
2018/05/14 21:51:43
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby iRelevant 2018/05/15 14:54:07
I've got most of the versions of Sonar on my Win 7 32 boot, plus the last "classic" cakewalk verson:
Pro Audio 9, Sonar XL, Sonar 3, Sonar 5, Sonar 7, Sonar 8, Sonar 8.5, Sonar X1, Sonar X2, Sonar X3, Sonar Platinum
For me Sonar Platinum has been the most stable, with X3 and 8.5 as joint seconds.
As far as versions of Platinum itself, they just seemed to get more stable for me as each month went along (with one or two exceptions), but the last one that was released (Oct 2017) is very stable for me.
M.
|
DeeringAmps
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2614
- Joined: 2005/10/03 10:29:25
- Location: Seattle area
- Status: offline
Re: What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ?
2018/05/14 21:56:29
(permalink)
I'm running 2017.10 on my office rig (Win7Prox86).
Works fine here, aux tracks can be "buggy"; but they are in x64 on the Cat in the studio as well.
Haven't really tried aux tracks with CbB yet...
T
Tom Deering Tascam FW-1884 User Resources Page Firewire "Legacy" Tutorial, Service Manual, Schematic, and Service Bulletins Win10x64 StudioCat Pro Studio Coffee Lake 8086k 32gb RAM  RME UFX (Audio) Tascam FW-1884 (Control) in Win 10x64 Pro
|
iRelevant
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 430
- Joined: 2017/10/25 21:14:48
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re: What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ?
2018/05/14 22:10:53
(permalink)
msmcleod
I've got most of the versions of Sonar on my Win 7 32 boot, plus the last "classic" cakewalk verson:
Pro Audio 9, Sonar XL, Sonar 3, Sonar 5, Sonar 7, Sonar 8, Sonar 8.5, Sonar X1, Sonar X2, Sonar X3, Sonar Platinum
For me Sonar Platinum has been the most stable, with X3 and 8.5 as joint seconds.
As far as versions of Platinum itself, they just seemed to get more stable for me as each month went along (with one or two exceptions), but the last one that was released (Oct 2017) is very stable for me.
M.
Sounds like a nice setup. Does "Win 7 32 boot" mean that you running a win 7 32-bit install, not x64 ?
|
iRelevant
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 430
- Joined: 2017/10/25 21:14:48
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re: What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ?
2018/05/14 22:17:39
(permalink)
DeeringAmps
I'm running 2017.10 on my office rig (Win7Prox86).
Works fine here, aux tracks can be "buggy"; but they are in x64 on the Cat in the studio as well.
Haven't really tried aux tracks with CbB yet...
T
I had the x64 version running successfully on the win7x64 system I'm now transforming. Uninstalled the x64 version, and reinstalled the 32 bit version. That part went well, but I'm having serious problems getting it to scan my vst- plugins ... scan crashes all the time ... can't even get the basic Studio Instruments to show up :/
|
msmcleod
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 920
- Joined: 2004/01/27 07:15:30
- Location: Scotland
- Status: offline
Re: What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ?
2018/05/14 22:18:16
(permalink)
iRelevant
msmcleod
I've got most of the versions of Sonar on my Win 7 32 boot, plus the last "classic" cakewalk verson:
Pro Audio 9, Sonar XL, Sonar 3, Sonar 5, Sonar 7, Sonar 8, Sonar 8.5, Sonar X1, Sonar X2, Sonar X3, Sonar Platinum
For me Sonar Platinum has been the most stable, with X3 and 8.5 as joint seconds.
As far as versions of Platinum itself, they just seemed to get more stable for me as each month went along (with one or two exceptions), but the last one that was released (Oct 2017) is very stable for me.
M.
Sounds like a nice setup. Does "Win 7 32 boot" mean that you running a win 7 32-bit install, not x64 ?
Yes, it's one machine with 3 boot options: Windows 10 64 bit Windows 7 64 bit Windows 7 32 bit So the 64 bit boots have 64 bit apps, and the 32 bit boot has the 32 bit apps. The 64 bit versions only have X3, SPLAT and CbB though.
|
DeeringAmps
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2614
- Joined: 2005/10/03 10:29:25
- Location: Seattle area
- Status: offline
Re: What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ?
2018/05/14 22:51:28
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby iRelevant 2018/05/15 14:56:03
I've always installed Sonar x64 and x86 versions on my StudioCat.
Never had any vst scan issues using both the x64 and x86 vst and vsti.
T
Tom Deering Tascam FW-1884 User Resources Page Firewire "Legacy" Tutorial, Service Manual, Schematic, and Service Bulletins Win10x64 StudioCat Pro Studio Coffee Lake 8086k 32gb RAM RME UFX (Audio) Tascam FW-1884 (Control) in Win 10x64 Pro
|
iRelevant
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 430
- Joined: 2017/10/25 21:14:48
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re: What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ?
2018/05/15 01:14:01
(permalink)
msmcleod
iRelevant
msmcleod
I've got most of the versions of Sonar on my Win 7 32 boot, plus the last "classic" cakewalk verson:
Pro Audio 9, Sonar XL, Sonar 3, Sonar 5, Sonar 7, Sonar 8, Sonar 8.5, Sonar X1, Sonar X2, Sonar X3, Sonar Platinum
For me Sonar Platinum has been the most stable, with X3 and 8.5 as joint seconds.
As far as versions of Platinum itself, they just seemed to get more stable for me as each month went along (with one or two exceptions), but the last one that was released (Oct 2017) is very stable for me.
M.
Sounds like a nice setup. Does "Win 7 32 boot" mean that you running a win 7 32-bit install, not x64 ?
Yes, it's one machine with 3 boot options:
Windows 10 64 bit
Windows 7 64 bit
Windows 7 32 bit
So the 64 bit boots have 64 bit apps, and the 32 bit boot has the 32 bit apps.
The 64 bit versions only have X3, SPLAT and CbB though.
Very convenient :) I have plenty of space and computers, so I'm going for dedicated solutions.But I see getting a Win 7 32 bit install would probably make life a whole bit easier. Some plug-ins (like TruePianos) don't give an option for the 32-bit VST install, it's just assumed you want the x64-bit version if you have that kind of system.
|
iRelevant
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 430
- Joined: 2017/10/25 21:14:48
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re: What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ?
2018/05/15 01:22:39
(permalink)
DeeringAmps
I've always installed Sonar x64 and x86 versions on my StudioCat.
Never had any vst scan issues using both the x64 and x86 vst and vsti.
T
I think my problem is connected to that I already had only the x64 version installed, and then went for a pure 32-bit install. Looks like my problems are related to how CCC deals with that situation. Previous downloads are stored somewhere, and when I in CCC selected to reinstall all the extra to splat ... (where I had the off-line installer available and got the option of making a 32-bit install) ... there is no 32/64 question in CCC ... it just reinstalls the previous downloaded extras ... which where x64 bit ... and in effect I end up without the 32-versions. I could have simply added the x64 bit vst folder to the search path ... but that would defeat the purpose of the reinstall. Waiting for the off-line installers to download now ... guess that will sort things out for me.
|
iRelevant
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 430
- Joined: 2017/10/25 21:14:48
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re: What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ?
2018/05/15 15:10:17
(permalink)
Problem has been solved. To me it looks like the problem lies in CCC ... there is no question there if you want to do a 32-bit install, it's (maybe naturally) it assumes that you want a x64 bit install on a x64 bit system.
So the only way of getting the option of a 32 bit instal (on a x64 system) is to use the off-line installer.
My problem was that I after doing that, used the CCC to install the "plug-in extras" ... I thought that since it was registered in CCC that I had the 32-bit SPLAT installed ... it would be an easy ride from there ... unfortunately ... CCC reinstalled the previous x64 bit plugs ... not in 32 bit modus ... so ... I had to download all the off-line installers also for this ... but now it all works as expected. Problem solved, and it doesn't look like it has anything to do with the SPLAT version as such. I'm using the last edition made. It's more connected to the fairly reasonable workings of the CCC, and special cases. Me thinks.
Thanks for all the helpful comments.
- Sven
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ?
2018/05/15 15:22:05
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby iRelevant 2018/05/16 01:45:08
By default, the Command Center installs the version appropriate for the OS. To force 32bit install on 64bit Windows using the Command Center make sure "Verbose Install" is enabled. This will cause every installer to show all prompts including the 32/64bit install option.The Vebose Install option is on the "Command Center" setup screen.
|
iRelevant
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 430
- Joined: 2017/10/25 21:14:48
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re: What was the historically most stable 32-bit SPLAT release ?
2018/05/16 01:45:24
(permalink)
Aha ! :) Thank you very much scook, that's very helpful ... you seem to be all knowing.
|