What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level

Author
Psalmist35
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1471
  • Joined: 2005/12/31 11:11:33
  • Location: North Carolina
  • Status: offline
2011/10/21 15:49:15 (permalink)

What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level

I'm thinking about assembling an audio rig for when I perform live (MIC --->  MIC Pre ---> EQ --> Dynamic processor ---> FX processor. . . . . .  I visit (Play Sax) several Churches from time to time and find that most sounds guys working the mixer don't know what they're doing.  I'd like a little more control over my sound.  Of course,  I understand this means telling the sound guy to bypass the onboard eq and any other whistles, bells and kazoo's in between.
 
So, what's the best practice to go from a +4db output to a MIC level input into the FOH console?
 
Thanks for any insight.
 
regards,
Rich

George Foreman Grill; Ginsu knifes; Clapper; Home Grown Intel i7 -6700K 16G Ram; Sonar Platinum; MOTU 896HD; Tascam US2400; 

My Music
#1

10 Replies Related Threads

    bitflipper
    01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
    • Total Posts : 26036
    • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
    • Location: Everett, WA USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level 2011/10/21 17:25:44 (permalink)
    I'd do everything possible to avoid having to do that. Does the console not have line inputs?


    All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

    My Stuff
    #2
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level 2011/10/21 17:52:04 (permalink)
    First, you are likely to piss off the sound guy - church or not.  It would be like him telling you he's not going to turn you up during your solo because he doesn't like your playing.

    If you approach it as you've found your "sound" it might go better.  Get a nice channel strip (and bring your own mic and cable) so you seem like a prima donna and not a hack.  I can't suggest what would be a good one for a sax, but I know the Portico II sounds good on it.  I wouldn't want to drag one around town, tho.

    AS far as matching from the box to the cable, the sound is probably wired box to board preamp - you'll need adaptors to use the XLR cable to line input, along with step down transformers depending upon the board.  he might have an open line channel, but don't count on it.

    It seems like a lot of trouble, but might be worth it.  I'd talk to the guy(s) first, tho, and tell them what you usually do live as far as sound.  My wife's band saxophonist just likes the lows cut, some top end and slather on the reverb.  She also does the flute and that works too, so one 58 to rule them all.


    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #3
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level 2011/10/23 02:26:08 (permalink)
    There is nothing wrong with padding down your final signal. I can see where you are getting at.  What Dave is saying might be true in a studio environment as you would be dropping the signal down and gaining it up again. But in a live situation you would never know the difference.

    But you should not have to drop the signal down anyway. Just send the desk + 4dbu and simply tell them to expect a line level signal. They should be able to maybe use a pad and/or turn the mic gain down accordingly on your channel. And yes no EQ or effects on your channel.

    But you can get in line attenuators if you felt the need. You would need to knock things down 40 db I would say at least.

    http://www.fullcompass.co.../Attenuators-Pads.html

    You could make one of you feel inclined.

    http://www.uneeda-audio.com/pads/


    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #4
    Psalmist35
    Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1471
    • Joined: 2005/12/31 11:11:33
    • Location: North Carolina
    • Status: offline
    Re:What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level 2011/10/24 08:36:22 (permalink)
    Bit, I'd be surprised if a console did not have line level inputs available.  However, I rarely see line level inputs available on stage.  Part of the reason for the question.
     
    @@:  Yeah, I may be a prema donna although I don't think I would be any different than a guitarist asking for a specific amp to play through when on the road.  FWIW, I have been at the FOH running sound when visiting musicians/bands have had specific needs as such.  Many guitarists have spent countless hours fine tunning "their sound" only to be at the mercy of a scenerio just as I have described above. 
     
    To be honest I use the term "my sound" loosely.  My desires are not unwarranted.  I can typically play any of 4 possibly 5 instruments in a song set.  Each having unique EQ requirements.  These being: Tenor Sax, Alto Sax, Soprano Sax, Penny Whistle and Flute.  I'm always moving the mic around and it's frustrating to hear a piercing shrill sound when I'm playing my tenor sax.  A clip-on mic for each of the sax's might be a better/cheaper solution but most venues don't have 3-channels to dedicate to my instruments.  Finding and happy medium on the EQ for all 4/5 instruments on 1 universal mic is equally as challenging.  Just talking out out laoud but an alternative may also to to have a small 4 or 6 channel mixer on stage with me.  Hmmmmm . . . . . .  There are many choices.
     
    @ Jeff:  Thanks for the info.  I'll check the links you've referenced when I get a chance.
     
    regards,
    Rich
     
     

    George Foreman Grill; Ginsu knifes; Clapper; Home Grown Intel i7 -6700K 16G Ram; Sonar Platinum; MOTU 896HD; Tascam US2400; 

    My Music
    #5
    The Maillard Reaction
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 31918
    • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
    • Status: offline
    Re:What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level 2011/10/24 09:10:03 (permalink)
    If I played sax... I don't but I've worked with some good sax players... and I had your concerns I would simply stop using a mic.

    That after all, is the problem.

    The sax should fill a 2000 seat room and if the room is bigger... I'll bet there's a reason the folks in the back choose to sit there. ;-)

    Let your actual sound fill the room. You'll be surprised how much of it gets picked up by other mics.

    Having said all that... if you were using one mic and a volunteer board baby sitter then I'd suggest that you learn how to work the mic. For example; If a soprano sax player wants to swamp a mic with *shrill*... it's all over right there. You can turn down the badness... but why have badness to turn down?


    Anyways, that's my perspective.


    Good luck.

    all the best,
    mike


    #6
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level 2011/10/24 10:28:45 (permalink)
    Rich,

    I understand your concerns about sound, it just is that sound guys can be fickle, esp. "volunteers." It is better to explain what you want.  If you've tried that and it doesn't stick, either because the sound man is ego driven or incompetent, then go for it.  But I would find a more delicate way to skip the bad sound than tell the soundman he should volunteer as an usher.

    @

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #7
    Psalmist35
    Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1471
    • Joined: 2005/12/31 11:11:33
    • Location: North Carolina
    • Status: offline
    Re:What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level 2011/10/24 13:38:36 (permalink)
    AT


    Rich,

    I understand your concerns about sound, it just is that sound guys can be fickle, esp. "volunteers." It is better to explain what you want.  If you've tried that and it doesn't stick, either because the sound man is ego driven or incompetent, then go for it.  But I would find a more delicate way to skip the bad sound than tell the soundman he should volunteer as an usher.

    @

    @ @: LOL!  I would like to think that I am more tactful in my conversatons with people in general and I certainly have encountered my share of egocentryic folk.  Maybe my OP came across wrong  and I have on ocassion used the wrong words to express a thought.  Afterall it is all about me anyway in'd it?
     
    @ Mike:  You're are 100% correct.  Afterall I am the one moving the mic around.  I can't blame anyone but myself for the position of the mic.  
     
    Working the mic is something I will need to experiment with.   Thanks for the suggestion.
     

    George Foreman Grill; Ginsu knifes; Clapper; Home Grown Intel i7 -6700K 16G Ram; Sonar Platinum; MOTU 896HD; Tascam US2400; 

    My Music
    #8
    fwrend
    Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 709
    • Joined: 2006/09/19 16:02:52
    • Location: Garden City, KS
    • Status: offline
    Re:What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level 2011/10/25 17:10:00 (permalink)
    I think it would depend on whether you are playing as a solo act with tracks or live with a band or whether you're filling in for an in-house band.

    I just picked up a couple of AKG C419ml clip on condensors for $49/ea at GC on clearance (although I had to spend another $40 on a phantom XLR->mini XLR adaptors) for my sax and bone player (large venue).  They'll go direct into FOH and mixed in as needed.

    I've had professional acts in like http://www.tombraxton.com/ and they often bring their own rack with DSPs for "their" own sound and the ability to change settings on the fly.  If that's the case, I think putting your own rack together for "your sound" is very doable and appropriate.  You are still going to rely on the in-house guy and as AT mentions you never know what you're going to get - their attitudes are similar if not worse many times than musicians
     
    For that, I'd look at something like the Presonus Live stuff with built in DSP, memory scenes, and even contol surface apps for iPads and phones.  With that you'd have a line or balanced in and a balanced line out into any available mic input. JMHO
    #9
    AT
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 10654
    • Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
    • Location: TeXaS
    • Status: offline
    Re:What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level 2011/10/26 00:50:35 (permalink)
    Rich,

    I wasn't saying you have an attitude, just that some of the guys that volunteer for something do it for status.  combine that with the common human foilables and ...  I'm sure you know to treat others as you would be treated, but I know from personal experience it can be hard, esp. after X times asking for something specific but the other person knows what is best for you.  It can get trying. ;-)

    https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome
    http://www.bnoir-film.com/  
     
    there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
    24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
    #10
    Jeff Evans
    Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5139
    • Joined: 2009/04/13 18:20:16
    • Location: Ballarat, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:What's the best practice from +4 db to MIC level 2011/10/26 17:43:49 (permalink)
    It might be OK to suggest not using a mic but it does not help in situations where a mic is really necessary.

    I can find out for you what the gear is but here in Australia we have a rather famous sax player. (Jamie Oehlers) At a recent gig I noticed Jamie uses a very nice mike attached to the bell but not right on the edge. It uses a special bracket that puts the mic a little further out the front but still pointing into the bell. He uses a wireless system to get the signal across to the back of the stage. You could investigate something like that. It is the ultimate in freedom. From there Jamie sends the signal straight to the PA and leaves it up to them to get right which in most cases happens. But in your case you could run the signal from the reciever into your processors and then send that down the line to the PA guy, (at line level too) telling him to use no EQ (flat) or effects etc.

    Jamie plays tenor and has a beautiful acoustic sound that is warm and fat and with this mike he gets exactly the same sound in the PA which is quite excellent. The mike is probably a DPA and costs five grand LOL!

    It should help to produce a better sound out front. There are still two things you have no control over though. One is how loud you are out front and the other is how well the PA is tuned to the room and hence how does the sax actually sound out front. If the PA FOH sound is well balanced and well tuned it should be OK then. But if not then anything goes out front and it might be terrible. But that is not your problem.
    post edited by Jeff Evans - 2011/10/26 17:52:55

    Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz - 8 Gb RAM - Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME PCI HDSP9632 - Steinberg Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 8- Studio One V4 - iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - Sierra 10.12.6 - Focusrite Clarett thunderbolt interface 
     
    Poor minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas -Eleanor Roosevelt
    #11
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1