Who else would like bus templates to work like track templates?

I have submitted a feature request for this functionality.
 
What got me thinking about it was watching the Charles Dye video. He started his mix project by opening a bus template file that created several fx buses he uses.
 
I have several older projects that I recorded just to get the idea saved and I would like to move them forward to continue working with them. Even some recient projects need to be updated as I improve my process since I do not always create a number of buses when I first start a new projet. I have created new templates to use going forward but next year I could be in the same boat as I get better at mixing and arranging etc.
 
 
Currently In order to achieve the change on an existing project I created a template with no tracks just buses to use migrating things.
 
I have created a new project called mixing bus template in its own folder using my template.
 
Saved the project and not I can copy this new project into the folder where the project I want to migrate is and rename it accordingly.
 
Then I can open both projects and select all in the original project and copy... go to the new project and paste.
 
This creates all the audio and midi tracks etc but does not add synths so I have to manually add them if I have not already bounced them to audio tracks.
 
At this point I have to go through the project and direct each trak to the correct bus and add sends etc. Then I am ready to start mixing.
 
It would all be so much easier if I could just import a but template into my existing project that would add 1 or several bus tot he project. I would still need to route things but all the other bus, track and synth would remain in place and it would be much quicker.
 
What do you guys think?
 
If you like the idea please do a feature request for it.
 
Thanks
 
 
p.s. sorry for any spelling errors I have disabled java and now the spell check will not work.

I did disable JavaScript because of the security issues I read about recently going on with it.

Tom, right but the security issues are with Java, not JavaScript. Java and JavaScript are two different technologies. There are relatively few sites that use Java these days, but JavaScript is pretty much everywhere. JavaScript happens to have the word "Java" in its name, and that's what's confusing. As soon as I saw that Java security report, I knew tons of people would mistakenly think they were talking about JavaScript and disable that in their browsers. Terrible job by Homeland Security and most media for not explaining that. So take my word for it (or look it up, but I've been in the Web biz for a long time), you should leave JavaScript enabled because it has nothing to do with Java or the security report.

Well I'll be a Tuco's uncle. The track template method works perfectly. THanks so much for that tidbit FBB.