Why do you need near-field monitors ?

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
micv
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 285
  • Joined: 2004/10/29 15:47:03
  • Status: offline
2005/08/11 15:26:32 (permalink)

Why do you need near-field monitors ?

I plan to build a home studio and was reading a thread on monitor here. What's the characteristic of a near, mid field monitors and what are they being used for ? I've always listen to music on my audiophile and car system and I think most people do too. So I've always listen to my mix and mastering through a pair of B&W 801 since in the end this is where I listen to all music.
I understand that ideally a studio should have various monitors setup but if cost is an issue do I really need other monitors ?
#1

34 Replies Related Threads

    Guest
    Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4951
    • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
    • Status: online
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 15:31:19 (permalink)
    most speakers are designed to project/focus the stereo image out in a typcial
    living room ( 6 to 12 feet out). near -field monitors are designed to focus the
    stereo image nearer than that .. which varies on the speaker but is
    usually 3 to 6 ft.

    jeff
    #2
    bermuda
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2271
    • Joined: 2004/04/28 12:34:40
    • Location: Bermuda
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 15:33:31 (permalink)
    Studio monitors, you want a flat response, no colouration of the sound.

    Basically so you can identify where your mix is frequency failing.

    If monitors colour sound then you are working on fixing a to a spectrum of sound that is wrong...

    Although if you know the limitations of your monitors, it is possible to compensate for this when adjusting frquencies.

    Also the room the monitors are in can screw the whole thing anyway, so you end up adjusting for you room (or improving it, and the monitors...combination of the two makes life tricky)


     Yes.
    #3
    ooblecaboodle
    Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2102
    • Joined: 2004/05/01 21:52:56
    • Location: North Wales
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 15:42:14 (permalink)
    also, studio monitors on the whole can handle faster and larger transients than hifi speakers.
    #4
    dachay2tnr
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 386
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 12:42:14
    • Location: Da Garden State
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 15:48:33 (permalink)
    Also near fields, because of their closer focus, are less affected by the room. In other words, you want to mix the music, and not compensate for the room you are mixing in.
    #5
    micv
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 285
    • Joined: 2004/10/29 15:47:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 15:59:18 (permalink)
    Colors or flat I don't think is relevant in monitor type. You can get flat response in many hifi speakers. I guess then with a close-in listening position, the room's acoustic has less of an effect than the hi-fi speakers. But if the room is treated properly then it shouldn't be a factor. So the main need for the near-field is room size ?
    #6
    Guest
    Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4951
    • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
    • Status: online
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 16:03:27 (permalink)
    So the main need for the near-field is room size ?


    as noted above, minimizing environment effects are much easier
    with near-fields .. even if you've got the room for projection/throw.
    jeff
    #7
    wogg
    Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1819
    • Joined: 2003/11/14 16:07:44
    • Location: Columbus, OH
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 16:10:40 (permalink)
    So I've always listen to my mix and mastering through a pair of B&W 801 since in the end this is where I listen to all music.


    Those aren't too bad at all and should compete well with many 'budget' monitors (perhaps around the <$500 range). Nearfield is regarding the positioning of the speakers nearer to the listener than any room elements mostly.

    Homepage:
    The World of Wogg

    #8
    Richard Brian
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3519
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 11:16:38
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 16:21:35 (permalink)
    with a close-in listening position, the room's acoustic has less of an effect than the hi-fi speakers


    But if you mix 3 feet in front of mid-field speakers, you're too close to hear the bass response properly. You can overmix and all your stuff would translate as bass heavy or muddy.
    #9
    micv
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 285
    • Joined: 2004/10/29 15:47:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 16:31:05 (permalink)
    I do walk around to different possition from time to time to avoid the 'too close to the tree' syndrome.
    If room effect and accuracy is important then wouldn't a vey good pair of headphone or in-ear also do the trick ?
    #10
    Sid Viscous
    Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1532
    • Joined: 2003/11/30 10:05:25
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 21:15:01 (permalink)
    You don't if you have a good sounding room and enough distance to use mid or far fields.
    #11
    michael japan
    Max Output Level: -22.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 5252
    • Joined: 2004/01/29 03:01:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 21:36:35 (permalink)
    do walk around to different possition from time to time to avoid the 'too close to the tree' syndrome.
    If room effect and accuracy is important then wouldn't a vey good pair of headphone or in-ear also do the trick ?


    headphones are nice as well-to check things you just don't hear on speakers-little clicks, length of reverb, minute panning, instruments in the same spectrum, etc. Trying on many different speakers, etc. is important. You should see my studio-speakers are everywhere, and in the next room. But to answer your original question, if for no other reason, and this could sound lame to you, wouldn't you want some studio monitors just for the fact that that's what every pro and enthusiast in the world uses? If hi-fi were good enough, do you think we would spend the money we do on speakers? There are numerous articles in music mags, etc. that address this very point, and have specifically mentioned that speakers is the thing that is overlooked the most when setting up a studio-that and a good mic. They are just so "mundane"-kind of like an amp. But oh so important. I have tried hi-fi speakers at many times over the years and I would say one of the main things is that they just don't translate the lo's tight, and the highs accurately. You don't know what you are tweaking because it's not accurate. They are purposely designed to sound good. Now there is a balance. I have auratones, NS10M's and JBL 4412's. One guy (in all the years that I have worked with people) didn't like the JBL's because he said they sound too hi-fi. I understand his meaning, but I like to have one set of speakers that you can really hear everything and gives some personal gratification. I love it when I switch from my 10M's to the JBL's-it's like somebody took the music out of the box. I would suggest that you get in touch with jasras (jonas) and he can give you some ideas of some lo-priced excellent speakers. He spends his days off listening to speakers-kind of like me---I love them. (uh, like them a lot.)

    Windows 10/64 bit/i7-6560U/SSD/16GB RAM/Cakelab/Sonar Platinum/Pro Tools/Studio 1/Studio 192/DP88/MOTU AVB/Grace M101/AKG Various/Blue Woodpecker/SM81x2/Yamaha C1L Grand Piano/CLP545/MOX88/MOTIF XS Rack Rack/MX61/Korg CX3/Karma/Scarbee EP88s/ Ivory/Ravenscroft Piano/JBL4410/NS10m/Auratones/Omnisphere/Play Composers Selection/Waves/Komplete Kontrol
    #12
    nprime
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2423
    • Joined: 2004/08/16 19:19:49
    • Location: Vancouver
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 23:06:57 (permalink)
    The concept that a near field monitor is less affected by the acoustic qualities of the room is fundamentally flawed. It is critical when building a studio that money be budgeted for proper acoustic treatment.

    No matter what the sound source, the room will be excited at certain frequencies and dampened at others. Perhaps you could argue that since most near field monitors are smallish they produce less energy in the bottom two octaves (20-40 and 40 -80 Hertz), therefore they are less likely to excite the room resonances that occupy the always problematic lower range. However, uneven response across the rest of the frequency spectrum will result no matter what the size of the speaker. These peaks and dips will make it impossible to achieve a properly balanced mix.

    The other argument for near field speakers is: since you listen to them at a closer proximity,you are dimishing the effects of the room's acoustics by increasing the "signal to noise ratio". This makes some sense, but the room still mattters...a lot. In the low end especially.

    R

    R

    Listen

    Sonar 5PE
    Intel DP35DP, E6750, 3 GB, 80GB/320 GB
    Scope (6 DSP) w/A16 interface
    PadKontrol, Legacy Series MS20, EZDrummer.
    #13
    Guest
    Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4951
    • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
    • Status: online
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/11 23:59:45 (permalink)
    The concept that a near field monitor is less affected by the acoustic qualities of the room is fundamentally flawed. It is critical when building a studio that money be budgeted for proper acoustic treatment.


    no argument there .. but the problem is simpler to deal with using near-fields .. not that it should
    be ignored.

    jeff

    ps: you're cat looks like a maui-wowie smoker.
    post edited by jmarkham - 2005/08/12 00:05:00
    #14
    Viz
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 96
    • Joined: 2005/04/09 02:35:25
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 00:47:50 (permalink)
    OT :- Advise wanted here....

    I have all Pro Equipment to Produce DVD/CD quality music at Home, but my room is NOT designed for a Studio. Its a 1st floor Flat, and all i do is close my Doors and Windows. Can anyone give a decent advise of how to turn the room into a basic recording studio so that minute sound goes out and comes in ?, cos i even record acoustic instruments and mix with my monitors turned ON. The thing is im not very rich and have basically little idea of going a Budget oriented Acoustic setup in my room. I heard Egg Cartons and Carpets are a very good stuff to start with. Thanks and sorry for going OT.

    I use M-Audio BX5s btw. I dont know whether its near-field or not, but i placed them very near to listening position and close to wall.
    #15
    Guest
    Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4951
    • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
    • Status: online
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 01:36:02 (permalink)
    i wouldn't stress too much over your room. it's kind of comforting to know that
    many of the great records of the past were mixed on stuff a lot less capable
    than your setup .. and in probably about the same room conditions. .. and you've
    got ears just like they do .. so take advantage of people like jsaras and chaz ..
    (search through their posts and you'll find some jewel stuff).
    jeff
    #16
    Viz
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 96
    • Joined: 2005/04/09 02:35:25
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 01:57:25 (permalink)
    Well i`ll do jus that, I do not complain about how clear i hear or how bad i hear, it sounds really good, but iam really concerned about my neighbours. I suspect a little bit of sound`s goin out even though i close my windows, and i dont want to mix my songs when its being heard by others.

    A very simple and cheap sound-proof solution to my room is the thing im looking for. And Apologies again for dragging the OT subject.
    post edited by Viz - 2005/08/12 02:04:44
    #17
    Guest
    Max Output Level: -25.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4951
    • Joined: 2009/08/03 10:50:51
    • Status: online
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 02:01:19 (permalink)
    ah ... neighbors screaming at you problem ... well, if you record them screaming
    at you, you can make a noise print and noise cancel them ;-)
    jeff
    #18
    nprime
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2423
    • Joined: 2004/08/16 19:19:49
    • Location: Vancouver
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 02:06:18 (permalink)

    A very simple and cheap sound-proof solution to my room is the thing im looking for.


    Cheap is a relative term.

    Improving the acoustics can be done for a few hundred dollars. Google Auralex and Ethan Winer.

    Providing acoustic isolation from the outside world and neighbors realistically costs thousands of dollars and involves construction. Anyone who tells you there is a cheap way to stop sound is mis-informed. Egg cartons do not stop sound, nor does carpet. Mechanical de-coupling of the walls, floor, and ceilings is required to actually isolate a room.

    R

    Listen

    Sonar 5PE
    Intel DP35DP, E6750, 3 GB, 80GB/320 GB
    Scope (6 DSP) w/A16 interface
    PadKontrol, Legacy Series MS20, EZDrummer.
    #19
    Viz
    Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 96
    • Joined: 2005/04/09 02:35:25
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 02:31:59 (permalink)
    Ah yeah i think i jus need to find my way out then, thanks for the replies.
    #20
    bermuda
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2271
    • Joined: 2004/04/28 12:34:40
    • Location: Bermuda
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 09:25:15 (permalink)
    To treat room properly is going to cost you some serious cake a few thousand $ to do a proper job more than likely

    You can do some budget things to help improve it somewhat as suggested by folks.

    why don't you monitor when recording acoustic instruments using headphones use bussed headphone mixes.

    A 4 stereo outs headphone amp costs for a half decent one under $100.

    You would avoid picking up the sound from your monitors in the acoustic recording.

    Saying that... it may depending on the position to the speakers and the room and the mic and the instrument either create a sonic novelty or more than likely cause phase problems.

    post edited by bermuda - 2005/08/12 09:42:47

     Yes.
    #21
    bermuda
    Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2271
    • Joined: 2004/04/28 12:34:40
    • Location: Bermuda
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 09:29:25 (permalink)
    Nope...

    Doesn't matter how good... headphone will not give a good sound to judge frequencies on directly.

    Using your logic we would all be using headphones instead of monitors !

    good try though

     Yes.
    #22
    dachay2tnr
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 386
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 12:42:14
    • Location: Da Garden State
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 10:11:48 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Richard Brian

    with a close-in listening position, the room's acoustic has less of an effect than the hi-fi speakers


    But if you mix 3 feet in front of mid-field speakers, you're too close to hear the bass response properly. You can overmix and all your stuff would translate as bass heavy or muddy.
    Because of the speaker size in most nearfields, I suspect you are not going to hear the bass response well, regardless of room treatment - particularly in the range below 40-50 Hz.
    #23
    micv
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 285
    • Joined: 2004/10/29 15:47:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 15:43:58 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: bermuda

    Doesn't matter how good... headphone will not give a good sound to judge frequencies on directly.


    Why is that ? Can you elaborate. I'm just trying to understand the technicality of things.
    #24
    Richard Brian
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3519
    • Joined: 2004/02/09 11:16:38
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 16:26:59 (permalink)
    .
    post edited by Richard Brian - 2005/08/12 18:02:44
    #25
    Mooch4056
    Max Output Level: -0.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7494
    • Joined: 2005/02/19 17:40:35
    • Location: Chicago
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 16:34:51 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: micv

    I do walk around to different possition from time to time to avoid the 'too close to the tree' syndrome.
    If room effect and accuracy is important then wouldn't a vey good pair of headphone or in-ear also do the trick ?


    I will check panning with headphones and that's it -- here is a good article of why NOT to use headphones during mixdown and why monitors should be used -- here's the link ------->> http://www.bluebearsound.com/articles/headphones.htm

    From Now On Call Me Conquistador! 
     
    Donate to the cure Bapu Foundation
    Email: mooch4056@gmail.com for more info




    #26
    bubblefish
    Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 914
    • Joined: 2004/03/21 19:44:13
    • Location: montreal: canada
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 17:02:49 (permalink)
    hey michael

    i do so enjoy reading your pearls of wisdom and appriciate the insight you often share with us both musicaly and other wise.

    but do you think you could put some spaces in between your paragraphs some times as its killing my eyes

    If you can think of it from time to time.

    cheers kieran

    If you live the sacred and despise the ordinary,
    you are still bobbing in the ocean of delusion

    Some sounds with spaces
    #27
    micv
    Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 285
    • Joined: 2004/10/29 15:47:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 17:32:11 (permalink)
    Lets take the room acoustic out of the equation and assume that we have high quality or reference speakers, and you adjust the listening position accordingly. How is a hi-fi stack up against near field ?
    I know that no two pairs of speaker sound the same. All claimed that they re-procduce the most accurate and "natural" sounding.
    Or really they are just the same but tuned to different application ? and one must be familiar with the characteristic of whatever monitor he uses.
    #28
    nprime
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2423
    • Joined: 2004/08/16 19:19:49
    • Location: Vancouver
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 17:49:41 (permalink)
    Just to throw a bone in the soup...

    I do a lot of my mixing on these:

    http://www.audio-technica.com/cms/headphones/7c784888146c212e/index.html

    I find that my mixes translate very well to other systems, thank you very much. I think it's because their response is ruler flat.

    R

    Listen

    Sonar 5PE
    Intel DP35DP, E6750, 3 GB, 80GB/320 GB
    Scope (6 DSP) w/A16 interface
    PadKontrol, Legacy Series MS20, EZDrummer.
    #29
    tarsier
    Max Output Level: -45 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3029
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 11:51:35
    • Location: 6 feet under
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why do you need near-field monitors ? 2005/08/12 19:10:19 (permalink)
    If you want to mix on headphones (and there are many valid reasons why you would... like poor room acoustics, poor monitors, you're using your laptop in the mountains...) it's entirely possible. You just need to learn how to make headphone mixes that translate well to other systems. We test our loudspeaker mixes on many different systems (most of us anyway...) to hear how they translate. Just do the same with your headphone mixes. It takes just as much time to learn how to mix on headphones as it does on speakers. Besides which, you'll get much better at listening to the details if you are always comparing your headphone mixes to other mixes on various systems.

    I say it's perfectly ok to mix using headphones, as long as you know the pitfalls (such as the ones pointed out in the link in Mooch4056's post) and can learn to deal with them.
    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1