Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5?

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
rm5700@optonline.net
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 969
  • Joined: 2004/10/09 06:32:50
  • Location: CT
  • Status: offline
2011/04/06 06:05:36 (permalink)

Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5?

I was wondering about upgrading to X1 Producer from 8.5 Producer. It seems the only difference (of course it is a great one) is the interface.
 
Is there anything else different or added to it? I mean there are no new synth plugins or effects, right? 
 
When I jumped from Studio 7 to Producer 8.5 it was a huge difference, especially for the same amount of $$. 
I think my upgrade then was only $99 or something close to that.
 
Thanks ahead of time
-Rob

Sonar X3 Producer, Toxic Biohazard IV, Rayblaster, Minimonsta, OP-X Pro II, kHS ONE, Melodyne Editor, Saurus, ElectraX, LuSH-101, Gladiator 2, Rapture, Dimension Pro, Wusikstation 7,  Nemesis, impOSCar2, Sampletank2xl, SonikSynth2,  Battery 3,  M-Audio Oxygene 25 and Audiophile 2496   
http://soundcloud.com/examigan 

#1

32 Replies Related Threads

    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 06:48:31 (permalink)
    Yes there are a few neat new add in plugins. The full Studio Instruments is included. The biggest new thing is Pro Channel. This is a built in channel strip on each track. It is not a plugin.

    The Browser is much improved. The track Inspector is likewise  much improved. There are a lot of either improved things in X1 or new things.

    I do think from all I have seen with X1 it also performs better. Is snappier and more solid feeling.

    With the patches X1 is a very solid DAW. On my system I was not having many problems before the patches.

    Edit to add.

    If you are solid in the way Sonar 8XX works X1 may be at first a bit confounding to you. It does a lot of things very differently. However it has a logic to it that is quick to grasp. The smart tools for example are nothing like what 8 offers. Many here have had problems learning them. Yet I believe its due to them not taking the time and learn them. How they work is outstanding to me.

    There are no real missing features in X1 from 8 just accessed differently.  If one studies the manual and comes here and asks questions the learning curve can be a quick and rewarding process.

    X1 is at present a truly great DAW but it will be getting better over time. I think it a no brainer to upgrade. 


    post edited by John - 2011/04/06 07:09:39

    Best
    John
    #2
    subtlearts
    Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2200
    • Joined: 2006/01/10 05:59:21
    • Location: Berlin
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 07:13:20 (permalink)

    +1 to everything John said, and I'd add screensets and FX chains as major improvements - maybe more than they seem at first glance. 

    Also, the upgrade from 8.5 producer is also only $99. At this point I say go for it, I am personally quite pleased that I did. No doubt others who are not as happy will give their different or opposite opinions, but that's mine. 

    tobias tinker 
    music is easy: just start with complete silence, and take away the parts you don't like!
    tobiastinker.com
    aeosrecords.com
    soundfascination.com
    Sonar Platinum, a bunch of other stuff...
    #3
    Rampdog
    Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 529
    • Joined: 2006/06/11 10:29:04
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 07:56:49 (permalink)
    X1b has been pretty solid for me so far... I just wish someone would come out with some better color templetes like we had with 8.5.....................

    Windows XP Pro  32x
    Sonar X1d Producer
    Intel i7 Quad Core
    3x3 Gig RAM 
    Mackie Onyx 1220i
    Casio PX-110 88 Keyboard
    Korg K61 P / Midi Keyboard
    Assorted Guitars 
    http://soundcloud.com/ramps
    #4
    rm5700@optonline.net
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 969
    • Joined: 2004/10/09 06:32:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 08:24:37 (permalink)
    John


    Yes there are a few neat new add in plugins. The full Studio Instruments is included. The biggest new thing is Pro Channel. This is a built in channel strip on each track. It is not a plugin.

    The Browser is much improved. The track Inspector is likewise  much improved. There are a lot of either improved things in X1 or new things.

    I do think from all I have seen with X1 it also performs better. Is snappier and more solid feeling.

    With the patches X1 is a very solid DAW. On my system I was not having many problems before the patches.

    Edit to add.

    If you are solid in the way Sonar 8XX works X1 may be at first a bit confounding to you. It does a lot of things very differently. However it has a logic to it that is quick to grasp. The smart tools for example are nothing like what 8 offers. Many here have had problems learning them. Yet I believe its due to them not taking the time and learn them. How they work is outstanding to me.

    There are no real missing features in X1 from 8 just accessed differently.  If one studies the manual and comes here and asks questions the learning curve can be a quick and rewarding process.

    X1 is at present a truly great DAW but it will be getting better over time. I think it a no brainer to upgrade. 
     
     
    For some reason I didn't even notice that the full studio instruments were in there, I need reading glasses 
    Also I remember seeing a video showing how the Pro Channel works and also the Smart Tools, both look nice/real useful...and just those 2 almost make the deal by themselves.
     
    Thanks,
    Rob


    Sonar X3 Producer, Toxic Biohazard IV, Rayblaster, Minimonsta, OP-X Pro II, kHS ONE, Melodyne Editor, Saurus, ElectraX, LuSH-101, Gladiator 2, Rapture, Dimension Pro, Wusikstation 7,  Nemesis, impOSCar2, Sampletank2xl, SonikSynth2,  Battery 3,  M-Audio Oxygene 25 and Audiophile 2496   
    http://soundcloud.com/examigan 

    #5
    rm5700@optonline.net
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 969
    • Joined: 2004/10/09 06:32:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 08:27:22 (permalink)
    subtlearts


    +1 to everything John said, and I'd add screensets and FX chains as major improvements - maybe more than they seem at first glance. 

    Also, the upgrade from 8.5 producer is also only $99. At this point I say go for it, I am personally quite pleased that I did. No doubt others who are not as happy will give their different or opposite opinions, but that's mine. 

    I totally forgot about the screensets, I must be losing it... thanks for reminding me.
    Those look really useful.

    Sonar X3 Producer, Toxic Biohazard IV, Rayblaster, Minimonsta, OP-X Pro II, kHS ONE, Melodyne Editor, Saurus, ElectraX, LuSH-101, Gladiator 2, Rapture, Dimension Pro, Wusikstation 7,  Nemesis, impOSCar2, Sampletank2xl, SonikSynth2,  Battery 3,  M-Audio Oxygene 25 and Audiophile 2496   
    http://soundcloud.com/examigan 

    #6
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 08:30:12 (permalink)

    For some reason I didn't even notice that the full studio instruments were in there, I need reading glasses
    It may not be you. I didn't know until I fell over them by accident. CW for some reason isn't making them much of a big deal.

    They are all there but don't look to CW to know that.

    Best
    John
    #7
    chuckebaby
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13146
    • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 09:13:26 (permalink)
    when i first opened x1 i loaded it up..looked at it for like 3 seconds ..kinda like i had seen a picture of a naked women..and then closed it..it was overwhelming to say the least..once i finaly atarted playing with it..i realized i overreacted..even though the gui is different it still the same old sonar behind the mask.and with imo better features.some have changed sure there could be a few things different but for the most part.i love it.i will love it even more when my v-studio gets here tommorow.ordered that on saturday.i went from usind a twenty four track recording studio to sonar way back when..im not sure if its just this version but to me the punch ins on from stop in the trans port control with a 4 count are flawless..i cant even hear the punch.which is critical if your piecing

    Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
    Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
    Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
       
    #8
    stickman393
    Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1528
    • Joined: 2003/11/07 18:35:26
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 12:35:58 (permalink)
    There is nothing in SONAR X1 that you haven't got with 8.5.3 except the Pro Channel strip, (and I think some Studio Instrument plugins). 

    If this is important to you, that might tip the balance in favor of X1. But everything comes with a price, and the price of Pro Channel is: a) bugs, b) incompatibility issues with projects created in earlier versions, if you have used the built-in Sonitus EQ on tracks/buses (not talking about the FX bin, here).

    All the touted advantages of X1 are 100% subjective. Buyer beware.


    #9
    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 12:43:51 (permalink)

    X-1 has been a total pleasure to run here .. now with new patches
    its even better, a few pre install things to consider and load it..IM
    never looking back..Jon
    #10
    rm5700@optonline.net
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 969
    • Joined: 2004/10/09 06:32:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 13:13:03 (permalink)
    stickman393


    There is nothing in SONAR X1 that you haven't got with 8.5.3 except the Pro Channel strip, (and I think some Studio Instrument plugins). 

    If this is important to you, that might tip the balance in favor of X1. But everything comes with a price, and the price of Pro Channel is: a) bugs, b) incompatibility issues with projects created in earlier versions, if you have used the built-in Sonitus EQ on tracks/buses (not talking about the FX bin, here).

    All the touted advantages of X1 are 100% subjective. Buyer beware.


    What happens when you open an old project if it has used the built-in EQ like you mention? Will it load, but just need some adjustment done to it?

    Sonar X3 Producer, Toxic Biohazard IV, Rayblaster, Minimonsta, OP-X Pro II, kHS ONE, Melodyne Editor, Saurus, ElectraX, LuSH-101, Gladiator 2, Rapture, Dimension Pro, Wusikstation 7,  Nemesis, impOSCar2, Sampletank2xl, SonikSynth2,  Battery 3,  M-Audio Oxygene 25 and Audiophile 2496   
    http://soundcloud.com/examigan 

    #11
    rm5700@optonline.net
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 969
    • Joined: 2004/10/09 06:32:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 13:15:57 (permalink)
    John



    For some reason I didn't even notice that the full studio instruments were in there, I need reading glasses
    It may not be you. I didn't know until I fell over them by accident. CW for some reason isn't making them much of a big deal.

    They are all there but don't look to CW to know that.
     
    Thanks for the info John. 
    Did you ever run into issues like what Stickman mentioned on here? He said there can be problems importing if it was an old project from 8.5 and it had used the built-in EQ on tracks/busses.

    Sonar X3 Producer, Toxic Biohazard IV, Rayblaster, Minimonsta, OP-X Pro II, kHS ONE, Melodyne Editor, Saurus, ElectraX, LuSH-101, Gladiator 2, Rapture, Dimension Pro, Wusikstation 7,  Nemesis, impOSCar2, Sampletank2xl, SonikSynth2,  Battery 3,  M-Audio Oxygene 25 and Audiophile 2496   
    http://soundcloud.com/examigan 

    #12
    HumbleNoise
    Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2946
    • Joined: 2004/01/04 12:53:50
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 13:19:28 (permalink)
    stickman393


    There is nothing in SONAR X1 that you haven't got with 8.5.3 except the Pro Channel strip, (and I think some Studio Instrument plugins). 

    If this is important to you, that might tip the balance in favor of X1. But everything comes with a price, and the price of Pro Channel is: a) bugs, b) incompatibility issues with projects created in earlier versions, if you have used the built-in Sonitus EQ on tracks/buses (not talking about the FX bin, here).

    All the touted advantages of X1 are 100% subjective. Buyer beware.


    There are indeed significant new features in X1, if you think they are significant. The browser is GREAT. Screen Sets are amazing. The Inspector is new as is the Multi Dock. And ProChannel.

    Sure they're not for everyone but that's quit a bit of 'new' over 8.53. There is a learning curve of course but for me at least the 'new' features in X1 far, far, outweighed the minor (in my case) bugs. YMMV.

    Humbly Yours

    Larry

    Sonar X2 x64
    MAudio 2496
    Yamaha MG 12/4
    Roland XV-88
    Intel MB with Q6600 and 4 GB Ram
    NVidia 9800 GTX
    Windows 7 x64 Home Premium
    #13
    HumbleNoise
    Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2946
    • Joined: 2004/01/04 12:53:50
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 13:23:34 (permalink)
    rm5700@optonline.net


    stickman393


    There is nothing in SONAR X1 that you haven't got with 8.5.3 except the Pro Channel strip, (and I think some Studio Instrument plugins). 

    If this is important to you, that might tip the balance in favor of X1. But everything comes with a price, and the price of Pro Channel is: a) bugs, b) incompatibility issues with projects created in earlier versions, if you have used the built-in Sonitus EQ on tracks/buses (not talking about the FX bin, here).

    All the touted advantages of X1 are 100% subjective. Buyer beware.


    What happens when you open an old project if it has used the built-in EQ like you mention? Will it load, but just need some adjustment done to it?


    There is a warning box and instructions to unload the Sonitus EQ and replace it with Pro Channel. You can still use the Sonitus EQ, it's just not embedded like it was before, you have to insert it like any other FX now.

    I'm not sure why people are importing older projects but to each their own. If it were me and I had an important project in 8.53 I would by ALL means finish it there, or at least save a copy to see how it behaves in X1 before committing.

    Humbly Yours

    Larry

    Sonar X2 x64
    MAudio 2496
    Yamaha MG 12/4
    Roland XV-88
    Intel MB with Q6600 and 4 GB Ram
    NVidia 9800 GTX
    Windows 7 x64 Home Premium
    #14
    StarTekh
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2007
    • Joined: 2004/03/09 12:02:20
    • Location: Montreal
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 13:39:34 (permalink)
    rm5700@optonline.net


    John



    For some reason I didn't even notice that the full studio instruments were in there, I need reading glasses
    It may not be you. I didn't know until I fell over them by accident. CW for some reason isn't making them much of a big deal.

    They are all there but don't look to CW to know that.
     
    Thanks for the info John. 
    Did you ever run into issues like what Stickman mentioned on here? He said there can be problems importing if it was an old project from 8.5 and it had used the built-in EQ on tracks/busses.


    > Ive had no issues importing/playing old recordings
       from 8.5.3 to X-1b-244 mind you im one of the users
       who has had little or no issues..we can load a song hit
       play.. launch Win TV.. and defrag the os disk all at the
       same time, with out the system glitching. rock solid ..
       here , if your worried go buy 2 sata drives 50.00 and
       load a clean install of X-1, I also suggest the BOX soft
       -ware, hard real copy is hard to beat, feel free to ask
       question, support is free ..jon
    #15
    chuckebaby
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13146
    • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 14:00:37 (permalink)
    HumbleNoise


    rm5700@optonline.net


    stickman393


    There is nothing in SONAR X1 that you haven't got with 8.5.3 except the Pro Channel strip, (and I think some Studio Instrument plugins). 

    If this is important to you, that might tip the balance in favor of X1. But everything comes with a price, and the price of Pro Channel is: a) bugs, b) incompatibility issues with projects created in earlier versions, if you have used the built-in Sonitus EQ on tracks/buses (not talking about the FX bin, here).

    All the touted advantages of X1 are 100% subjective. Buyer beware.


    What happens when you open an old project if it has used the built-in EQ like you mention? Will it load, but just need some adjustment done to it?


    There is a warning box and instructions to unload the Sonitus EQ and replace it with Pro Channel. You can still use the Sonitus EQ, it's just not embedded like it was before, you have to insert it like any other FX now.

    I'm not sure why people are importing older projects but to each their own. If it were me and I had an important project in 8.53 I would by ALL means finish it there, or at least save a copy to see how it behaves in X1 before committing.

    nicely said..i cant figure out for the life of me the risks some take.+1

    Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
    Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
    Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
       
    #16
    rm5700@optonline.net
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 969
    • Joined: 2004/10/09 06:32:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 18:29:03 (permalink)
    HumbleNoise


    rm5700@optonline.net


    stickman393


    There is nothing in SONAR X1 that you haven't got with 8.5.3 except the Pro Channel strip, (and I think some Studio Instrument plugins). 

    If this is important to you, that might tip the balance in favor of X1. But everything comes with a price, and the price of Pro Channel is: a) bugs, b) incompatibility issues with projects created in earlier versions, if you have used the built-in Sonitus EQ on tracks/buses (not talking about the FX bin, here).

    All the touted advantages of X1 are 100% subjective. Buyer beware.


    What happens when you open an old project if it has used the built-in EQ like you mention? Will it load, but just need some adjustment done to it?


    There is a warning box and instructions to unload the Sonitus EQ and replace it with Pro Channel. You can still use the Sonitus EQ, it's just not embedded like it was before, you have to insert it like any other FX now.

    I'm not sure why people are importing older projects but to each their own. If it were me and I had an important project in 8.53 I would by ALL means finish it there, or at least save a copy to see how it behaves in X1 before committing.

    What if down the line you want to re-work/re-mix a song (even if it was "finished") that you made a while back with an older version of Sonar, and want to use the new features in the latest version to help improve it a bit?  I mean, I would work with a copy of the original project, not the actual original one.
      
    post edited by rm5700@optonline.net - 2011/04/06 18:30:22

    Sonar X3 Producer, Toxic Biohazard IV, Rayblaster, Minimonsta, OP-X Pro II, kHS ONE, Melodyne Editor, Saurus, ElectraX, LuSH-101, Gladiator 2, Rapture, Dimension Pro, Wusikstation 7,  Nemesis, impOSCar2, Sampletank2xl, SonikSynth2,  Battery 3,  M-Audio Oxygene 25 and Audiophile 2496   
    http://soundcloud.com/examigan 

    #17
    rm5700@optonline.net
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 969
    • Joined: 2004/10/09 06:32:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 18:32:37 (permalink)
    HumbleNoise


    stickman393


    There is nothing in SONAR X1 that you haven't got with 8.5.3 except the Pro Channel strip, (and I think some Studio Instrument plugins). 

    If this is important to you, that might tip the balance in favor of X1. But everything comes with a price, and the price of Pro Channel is: a) bugs, b) incompatibility issues with projects created in earlier versions, if you have used the built-in Sonitus EQ on tracks/buses (not talking about the FX bin, here).

    All the touted advantages of X1 are 100% subjective. Buyer beware.


    There are indeed significant new features in X1, if you think they are significant. The browser is GREAT. Screen Sets are amazing. The Inspector is new as is the Multi Dock. And ProChannel.

    Sure they're not for everyone but that's quit a bit of 'new' over 8.53. There is a learning curve of course but for me at least the 'new' features in X1 far, far, outweighed the minor (in my case) bugs. YMMV.


    Cool, thanks for that...I think I have to upgrade now

    Sonar X3 Producer, Toxic Biohazard IV, Rayblaster, Minimonsta, OP-X Pro II, kHS ONE, Melodyne Editor, Saurus, ElectraX, LuSH-101, Gladiator 2, Rapture, Dimension Pro, Wusikstation 7,  Nemesis, impOSCar2, Sampletank2xl, SonikSynth2,  Battery 3,  M-Audio Oxygene 25 and Audiophile 2496   
    http://soundcloud.com/examigan 

    #18
    HumbleNoise
    Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2946
    • Joined: 2004/01/04 12:53:50
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 18:39:35 (permalink)
    rm5700@optonline.net


    HumbleNoise


    rm5700@optonline.net


    stickman393


    There is nothing in SONAR X1 that you haven't got with 8.5.3 except the Pro Channel strip, (and I think some Studio Instrument plugins). 

    If this is important to you, that might tip the balance in favor of X1. But everything comes with a price, and the price of Pro Channel is: a) bugs, b) incompatibility issues with projects created in earlier versions, if you have used the built-in Sonitus EQ on tracks/buses (not talking about the FX bin, here).

    All the touted advantages of X1 are 100% subjective. Buyer beware.


    What happens when you open an old project if it has used the built-in EQ like you mention? Will it load, but just need some adjustment done to it?


    There is a warning box and instructions to unload the Sonitus EQ and replace it with Pro Channel. You can still use the Sonitus EQ, it's just not embedded like it was before, you have to insert it like any other FX now.

    I'm not sure why people are importing older projects but to each their own. If it were me and I had an important project in 8.53 I would by ALL means finish it there, or at least save a copy to see how it behaves in X1 before committing.

    What if down the line you want to re-work/re-mix a song (even if it was "finished") that you made a while back with an older version of Sonar, and want to use the new features in the latest version to help improve it a bit?  I mean, I would work with a copy of the original project, not the actual original one.
      
    Well sure you can just open a copy of the older file in X1 and see how it goes. Not everyone and not every file has a problem but it shouldn't be ignored if that project is extremely valuable..

    Humbly Yours

    Larry

    Sonar X2 x64
    MAudio 2496
    Yamaha MG 12/4
    Roland XV-88
    Intel MB with Q6600 and 4 GB Ram
    NVidia 9800 GTX
    Windows 7 x64 Home Premium
    #19
    Somerset
    Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 634
    • Joined: 2004/10/20 06:07:27
    • Location: Sydney, Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/06 22:04:55 (permalink)
    I haven't had many issues. Old projects seems to open up fine for me. The Pro Channel works well for me and I think it alone is worth the upgrade price. The screen-sets are also a nice innovation. Make sure you keep 8.5.3 on your system in case you run into issues.
    #20
    WINYARDPRODUCTIONS
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13
    • Joined: 2011/04/07 05:17:56
    • Location: Melbourne Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/07 05:57:37 (permalink)
    rm5700@optonline.net


    I was wondering about upgrading to X1 Producer from 8.5 Producer. It seems the only difference (of course it is a great one) is the interface.
     
    Is there anything else different or added to it? I mean there are no new synth plugins or effects, right? 
     
    When I jumped from Studio 7 to Producer 8.5 it was a huge difference, especially for the same amount of $$. 
    I think my upgrade then was only $99 or something close to that.
     
    Thanks ahead of time
    -Rob
     
     
    I just uninstalled Sonar X1b because it isn't doing what it should. Went from Sonar 6 to the free Sonar 8.5/X1 upgrade and installed to a new HDD and PC. All the other software I have works the way it did on the old PC without any problems.  But Sonar X1b just won't behave. Installed a trial version of Sonar 8 - works fine! I paid for the Sonar 8.5 upgrade from Sonar 6 but I have been told that I need Sonar 8 in order to upgrade to Sonar 8.5 because Sonar 8.5 is just a patch - so I paid for a patch that isn't a full version????? Huh????  What I can not understand is why the offer to upgrade to 8.5 was given when Cakewalk must have known that I didn't have Sonar 8? I've been a user since Sonar 3 and also go back to the Cakewalk days when Cakewalk was a MIDI scoring only software. I have contacted support, so far nothing. 
     
    I can't use Sonar X1 and can't use Sonar 8.5 which I paid for...
    If Cakewalk support actually get around to answering my Emails NOW 4+ over a week and I can actually get a physical version of Sonar 8 sent to me, I will use that and will leave Sonar X1 well alone until I upgrade my PC some time in the future. 
     
    I should have known.  I didn't jump on Sonar 7 or 8 but Sonar X1 was very hyped and I decided to trust it.  Wrong. 

     
    This is my bread and butter and I'm essentially Dead In The Water until I can get a physical version of Sonar 8.

     
    Not very happy right now.
    post edited by WINYARDPRODUCTIONS - 2011/04/07 06:08:24
    #21
    rm5700@optonline.net
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 969
    • Joined: 2004/10/09 06:32:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/07 06:05:25 (permalink)
    Somerset


    I haven't had many issues. Old projects seems to open up fine for me. The Pro Channel works well for me and I think it alone is worth the upgrade price. The screen-sets are also a nice innovation. Make sure you keep 8.5.3 on your system in case you run into issues.


    Ok, thanks I will keep that version on there for a while (whenever I get X1) and see how it goes

    Sonar X3 Producer, Toxic Biohazard IV, Rayblaster, Minimonsta, OP-X Pro II, kHS ONE, Melodyne Editor, Saurus, ElectraX, LuSH-101, Gladiator 2, Rapture, Dimension Pro, Wusikstation 7,  Nemesis, impOSCar2, Sampletank2xl, SonikSynth2,  Battery 3,  M-Audio Oxygene 25 and Audiophile 2496   
    http://soundcloud.com/examigan 

    #22
    rm5700@optonline.net
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 969
    • Joined: 2004/10/09 06:32:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/07 06:09:07 (permalink)
    WINYARDPRODUCTIONS


    rm5700@optonline.net


    I was wondering about upgrading to X1 Producer from 8.5 Producer. It seems the only difference (of course it is a great one) is the interface.
     
    Is there anything else different or added to it? I mean there are no new synth plugins or effects, right? 
     
    When I jumped from Studio 7 to Producer 8.5 it was a huge difference, especially for the same amount of $$. 
    I think my upgrade then was only $99 or something close to that.
     
    Thanks ahead of time
    -Rob
    I just uninstalled Sonar X1b because it isn't doing what it should. Went from Sonar 6 to the free Sonar 8.5/X1 upgrade and installed to a new HDD and PC. All the other software I have works the way it did on the old PC without any problems.  But Sonar X1b just won't behave. Installed a trial version of Sonar 8 - works fine! I paid for the Sonar 8.5 upgrade from Sonar 6 but I have been told that I need Sonar 8 in order to upgrade to Sonar 8.5 which I think will work fine.  What I can not understand is why the offer to upgrade to 8.5 was given when Cakewalk must have known that I wouldn't be able to use Sonar 8? I've been a user since Sonar 3 and also go back to the Cakewalk days when Cakewalk was a MIDI scoring only software. I have contacted support, so far nothing. 
     
    I can't use Sonar X1 and can't use Sonar 8.5 which I paid for...
    If Cakewalk support actually get around to answering my Emails NOW 4+ over a week and I can actually get a physical version of Sonar 8 sent to me, I will use that and will leave Sonar X1 well alone until I upgrade my PC some time in the future. 
     
    I should have known.  I didn't jump on Sonar 7 or 8 but Sonar X1 was very hyped and I decided to trust it.  Wrong. 

     
    This is my bread and butter and I'm essentially Dead In The Water until I can get a physical version of Sonar 8.

     
    Not very happy right now.
    What doesn't work right with X1? ...and you can't use 8.5 either? I don't get why 8.5 wouldn't work. Didn't you get a full version?
    Also did you try a clean install on that newer PC or did you have 6 on there first?
     
    I went from Sonar 7 Studio right up to Sonar Producer 8.5, and it doesn't need version 8.0 on there first for it to work.
     
    post edited by rm5700@optonline.net - 2011/04/07 06:10:52

    Sonar X3 Producer, Toxic Biohazard IV, Rayblaster, Minimonsta, OP-X Pro II, kHS ONE, Melodyne Editor, Saurus, ElectraX, LuSH-101, Gladiator 2, Rapture, Dimension Pro, Wusikstation 7,  Nemesis, impOSCar2, Sampletank2xl, SonikSynth2,  Battery 3,  M-Audio Oxygene 25 and Audiophile 2496   
    http://soundcloud.com/examigan 

    #23
    mudgel
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 12010
    • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
    • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/07 06:48:30 (permalink)
    WINYARDPRODUCTIONS


    rm5700@optonline.net


    I was wondering about upgrading to X1 Producer from 8.5 Producer. It seems the only difference (of course it is a great one) is the interface.
     
    Is there anything else different or added to it? I mean there are no new synth plugins or effects, right? 
     
    When I jumped from Studio 7 to Producer 8.5 it was a huge difference, especially for the same amount of $$. 
    I think my upgrade then was only $99 or something close to that.
     
    Thanks ahead of time
    -Rob
     
     
    I just uninstalled Sonar X1b because it isn't doing what it should. Went from Sonar 6 to the free Sonar 8.5/X1 upgrade and installed to a new HDD and PC. All the other software I have works the way it did on the old PC without any problems.  But Sonar X1b just won't behave. Installed a trial version of Sonar 8 - works fine! I paid for the Sonar 8.5 upgrade from Sonar 6 but I have been told that I need Sonar 8 in order to upgrade to Sonar 8.5 because Sonar 8.5 is just a patch - so I paid for a patch that isn't a full version????? Huh????  What I can not understand is why the offer to upgrade to 8.5 was given when Cakewalk must have known that I didn't have Sonar 8? I've been a user since Sonar 3 and also go back to the Cakewalk days when Cakewalk was a MIDI scoring only software. I have contacted support, so far nothing. 
     
    I can't use Sonar X1 and can't use Sonar 8.5 which I paid for...
    If Cakewalk support actually get around to answering my Emails NOW 4+ over a week and I can actually get a physical version of Sonar 8 sent to me, I will use that and will leave Sonar X1 well alone until I upgrade my PC some time in the future. 
     
    I should have known.  I didn't jump on Sonar 7 or 8 but Sonar X1 was very hyped and I decided to trust it.  Wrong. 

     
    This is my bread and butter and I'm essentially Dead In The Water until I can get a physical version of Sonar 8.

     
    Not very happy right now.
     
     
    What was your bread and butter program before you bought the 8.5 to X1 upgrade? And why can't you still use it? If it's your bread and butter you really ought to have a more methodical process for upgrading. 
    I don't know where you got your information but it's wrong
     
                    SONAR 8.5 is a fully self functioning version in its own right. It is not a patch.
     
    The only time SONAR 8 came into the picture was if you bought the SONAR 8 to 8.5 upgrade download version, you needed to leave version 8 installed while you installed 8.5. It was the first time Cakewalk offered a download upgrade and it was done that way purely to save download size. If you have discs or got the download version with the upgrade to SONAR X1 you have a fully independent piece of software.
     
    i don't understand what issues you actually have. Please explain in a little more detail so we can guide you through the installtion process.
    post edited by mudgel - 2011/04/07 06:55:08

    Mike V. (MUDGEL)

    STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
    PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
    Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
    Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
    Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
    Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
    Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
    #24
    WINYARDPRODUCTIONS
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13
    • Joined: 2011/04/07 05:17:56
    • Location: Melbourne Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/07 09:09:20 (permalink)
    Response from Cakewalk support
     
    Re - Sonar 8.5 install:
     
    "Yes- 8.5 would only have been successfully installed if there was a version 8 on that system.  The 8.5 download did not have its own installers and it relied on version 8 in order to install itself.  So on a system without SONAR 8, then 8.5 would look like a patch.  However, that is not the case with X1.  It has its own installers and does not rely on any other version to install.  It does however need to be downloaded FIRST, and completely to one location.  Once both pieces of the file are completely downloaded- then the installation can begin.  Also, one only needs to double click on part one to start the process.  No Winzip (or anything like that) is necessary.  The part one file does all the work and it grabs part two when it’s ready for it". 
     
    "I was going to put new links here for X1 for you- but in looking in your account, it looks like you already have the physical media.  Which is a good thing- because you have the ability to reinstall more easily with those".  
      
     
    Point form:

    - I can only go by what Cakewalk have told me - I have Sonar 3, 5 & 6 + Purchased Sonar 8.5 (With free Sonar X1 UG).  See above email extract.

    - Forget Sonar X1b doesn't work, forget it - two installs embedded code shows driver issues with ASIO also sluggish, X1b hasn't addressed this perhaps will not? Anyway,  not going to work on my system with Win XP, all work-a-rounds tried.  Demo of  Sonar 8  - no issues looks promising.

    - Solution,  Sonar 8 according to Cakewalk!!!???  Sonar 8.5 according to the forum...
     
    - Running Win XP SP3 machines in Studio also have Win 7 (Sonar seems fine on Win 7 on notebook) strange?

    - I've developed software in the past no problems getting around computers and installs.  

    - If it is true that Sonar 8.5 is a full version, well,  I'll get that if Cakewalk answer my Emails and can confirm.  
     
     
    Note: Once again as you can see the email clearly states - Sonar 8.5 will only work as patch without Sonar 8 installed, Cakewalk's support response not my words.
     
    That's where it stands right now.

    post edited by WINYARDPRODUCTIONS - 2011/04/07 09:17:42
    #25
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/07 09:34:20 (permalink)
    You don't understand what Sonar 8.5 was as a DL even though it has been explained to you here.

    Sonar 8 came on 4 double layer DVDs. When 8.5 came out as a down load in order to make it a reasonable DL CW decided that as an upgrade from 8 you could DL the upgrade as long as you had 8 already installed.

    It was not a patch to 8. But it did use the support files from 8 in order to have a full install. 8 was still a separate install and could be run along side 8.5. If you bought 8.5 and not the upgrade it would only come on DVDs.

    Now the above is not important for your situation as far as installing X1.

    If you are on XP is it 32 bit or 64 bit Xp. If 64 bit CW does not support 64 bit XP.

    It should run fine on XP 32 bit as long as you have a system that is within the specs for running X1.

    I do however advise you to find a way to upgrade the OS and get a new graphics card. X1 is really meant for a Vista/Win 7 setup and is going to use what those OSs offer in graphics acceleration. This is not available in XP.

    Still you should be able to install X1 and it should run well enough to be useful.

    The more information you can relate on your system the better we can help you figure how to get it up and running.

    A complete list of system specs is needed.

     

    Best
    John
    #26
    chuckebaby
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 13146
    • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/07 09:43:30 (permalink)
    WINYARDPRODUCTIONS


    Response from Cakewalk support
     
    Re - Sonar 8.5 install:
     
    "Yes- 8.5 would only have been successfully installed if there was a version 8 on that system.  The 8.5 download did not have its own installers and it relied on version 8 in order to install itself.  So on a system without SONAR 8, then 8.5 would look like a patch.  However, that is not the case with X1.  It has its own installers and does not rely on any other version to install.  It does however need to be downloaded FIRST, and completely to one location.  Once both pieces of the file are completely downloaded- then the installation can begin.  Also, one only needs to double click on part one to start the process.  No Winzip (or anything like that) is necessary.  The part one file does all the work and it grabs part two when it’s ready for it". 
     
    "I was going to put new links here for X1 for you- but in looking in your account, it looks like you already have the physical media.  Which is a good thing- because you have the ability to reinstall more easily with those".  
      
     
    Point form:

    - I can only go by what Cakewalk have told me - I have Sonar 3, 5 & 6 + Purchased Sonar 8.5 (With free Sonar X1 UG).  See above email extract.

    - Forget Sonar X1b doesn't work, forget it - two installs embedded code shows driver issues with ASIO also sluggish, X1b hasn't addressed this perhaps will not? Anyway,  not going to work on my system with Win XP, all work-a-rounds tried.  Demo of  Sonar 8  - no issues looks promising.

    - Solution,  Sonar 8 according to Cakewalk!!!???  Sonar 8.5 according to the forum...
     
    - Running Win XP SP3 machines in Studio also have Win 7 (Sonar seems fine on Win 7 on notebook) strange?

    - I've developed software in the past no problems getting around computers and installs.  

    - If it is true that Sonar 8.5 is a full version, well,  I'll get that if Cakewalk answer my Emails and can confirm.  
     
     
    Note: Once again as you can see the email clearly states - Sonar 8.5 will only work as patch without Sonar 8 installed, Cakewalk's support response not my words.
     
    That's where it stands right now.

     
     
    not even worth explaining..some users get something in their head and no matter how much you explain to them they just dont get it.



    Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
    Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
    Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
       
    #27
    rm5700@optonline.net
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 969
    • Joined: 2004/10/09 06:32:50
    • Location: CT
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/07 09:53:23 (permalink)
    WINYARDPRODUCTIONS


    Response from Cakewalk support
     
    Re - Sonar 8.5 install:
     
    "Yes- 8.5 would only have been successfully installed if there was a version 8 on that system.  The 8.5 download did not have its own installers and it relied on version 8 in order to install itself.  So on a system without SONAR 8, then 8.5 would look like a patch.  However, that is not the case with X1.  It has its own installers and does not rely on any other version to install.  It does however need to be downloaded FIRST, and completely to one location.  Once both pieces of the file are completely downloaded- then the installation can begin.  Also, one only needs to double click on part one to start the process.  No Winzip (or anything like that) is necessary.  The part one file does all the work and it grabs part two when it’s ready for it". 
     
    "I was going to put new links here for X1 for you- but in looking in your account, it looks like you already have the physical media.  Which is a good thing- because you have the ability to reinstall more easily with those".  
      
     
    Point form:

    - I can only go by what Cakewalk have told me - I have Sonar 3, 5 & 6 + Purchased Sonar 8.5 (With free Sonar X1 UG).  See above email extract.

    - Forget Sonar X1b doesn't work, forget it - two installs embedded code shows driver issues with ASIO also sluggish, X1b hasn't addressed this perhaps will not? Anyway,  not going to work on my system with Win XP, all work-a-rounds tried.  Demo of  Sonar 8  - no issues looks promising.

    - Solution,  Sonar 8 according to Cakewalk!!!???  Sonar 8.5 according to the forum...
     
    - Running Win XP SP3 machines in Studio also have Win 7 (Sonar seems fine on Win 7 on notebook) strange?

    - I've developed software in the past no problems getting around computers and installs.  

    - If it is true that Sonar 8.5 is a full version, well,  I'll get that if Cakewalk answer my Emails and can confirm.  
     
     
    Note: Once again as you can see the email clearly states - Sonar 8.5 will only work as patch without Sonar 8 installed, Cakewalk's support response not my words.
     
    That's where it stands right now.


    Sorry to hear about the issues you're having.
    When I bought 8.5 it wasn't a download version, it was on DVDs.
    post edited by rm5700@optonline.net - 2011/04/07 09:58:23

    Sonar X3 Producer, Toxic Biohazard IV, Rayblaster, Minimonsta, OP-X Pro II, kHS ONE, Melodyne Editor, Saurus, ElectraX, LuSH-101, Gladiator 2, Rapture, Dimension Pro, Wusikstation 7,  Nemesis, impOSCar2, Sampletank2xl, SonikSynth2,  Battery 3,  M-Audio Oxygene 25 and Audiophile 2496   
    http://soundcloud.com/examigan 

    #28
    Mesh
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 27360
    • Joined: 2009/11/27 14:08:08
    • Location: Online right here!
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/07 10:13:52 (permalink)
    Somerset


    I haven't had many issues. Old projects seems to open up fine for me. The Pro Channel works well for me and I think it alone is worth the upgrade price. The screen-sets are also a nice innovation. Make sure you keep 8.5.3 on your system in case you run into issues.


    I have a lot of older projects (just the rough tracks) that don't have any Fx added and would like to use the Pro Channel before mxing them down. Are people having issues only when there are Fx used in 8.5 and then re-opening in X1? 

    Platinum Gaming DAW: AsRock Z77 Overclock Formula
    I7 3770k @ 4.5GHz : 16GB RAM G.Skill Ripjaws X
    250GB OS SSD : 3TB HDD : 1TB Sample HDD
    Win 10 Pro x 64 : NH-D14 CPU Cooler 
    HIS IceQ  2GB HD 7870
    Focusrite Scarlett 2i4
    The_Forum_Monkeys
    #29
    FastBikerBoy
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 11326
    • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
    • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
    • Status: offline
    Re:Worth upgrading from Producer 8.5? 2011/04/07 10:21:37 (permalink)
    To answer the original question IMHO screensets alone make the upgrade worth it. Ten independent views of a project all with their own different settings, hidden tracks, busses, zoom levels etc etc. - all available at the press of a button. They are very powerful.

    They alone save me loads of time, no more opening and closing or moving views, windows, synths, etc. or having to hide busses, tracks, etc. Set up a screenset and then press a button to jump to them instead.

    Add to that the Smart tools, pro channel, FX chains, the clean look and it's a real bargain. IMHO of course.
    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1