X1 did great!

Author
eikelbijter
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1002
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 22:23:52
  • Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
  • Status: offline
2011/05/05 19:13:56 (permalink)

X1 did great!

Finally got to do a couple of real sessions with X1 and I'm glad to say it behaved perfectly. 64 Sample buffer size all night long, not a glitch or dropout, running a pretty huge mix, nothing frozen, with input monitoring for a vocalist.

As I get used to the new tool behavior, I really dig it! Lot of things in the GUI seem unnecessarily big to me, but otherwise I'm very happy.

Rico

Xeon E3-1231V3, 16GB RAM, 480GB 840EVO SSD, MOTU 2480MK3, 424PCI w/ Sonar Platinum
Dell XPS 18, i5, 12GB RAM, 500GB SSD+128GB SSD, Roland VS-100 w/ Sonar Platinum

Dell XPS 13, i5, 8GB RAM, 256GB 840EVO SSD, Zoom UAC-2, Sonar Platinum

http://www.RicoBelled.com/

#1

2 Replies Related Threads

    ...wicked
    Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7360
    • Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
    • Location: Seattle
    • Status: offline
    Re:X1 did great! 2011/05/05 19:22:59 (permalink)
    Right on brother!

    ===========
    The Fog People
    ===========

    Intel i7-4790 
    16GB RAM
    ASUS Z97 
    Roland OctaCapture
    Win10/64   

    SONAR Platinum 64-bit    
    billions VSTs, some of which work    
    #2
    panup
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2538
    • Joined: 2006/05/23 09:34:35
    • Status: offline
    Re:X1 did great! 2011/05/05 19:30:38 (permalink)
    I use 64 buffer size, too, and X1 works super smoothly all the time.
    X1 rocks! :-)
    #3
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1