X2 - Improvements to audio engine?

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
kevinwhitect
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 376
  • Joined: 2005/01/15 11:21:04
  • Status: offline
2012/09/29 17:37:45 (permalink)

X2 - Improvements to audio engine?

Were there improvements made to the audio engine in X2? It may be just me, but it doesn't sound as digitally sterile as X1.

I've been comparing mixes done in X1 against bouncing down the same mixes in X2 ... and however subtle it may be, there appears to be more "sonic cream" in the X2 sound. 


... of course, it may be just me. :)

Kev-

All my music is free for download at:  

KevinWhiteMusic.com

The Rig:
i7 950 Processor
Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R V.2 Mobo
12G Corsair DDR3 RAM
OS Drive: Samsung 500G SSD
Program/Storage Drives: Samsung 500G SSD (x3)
Windows 10 Pro (Anniversary) x64
Layla 24/96 on ASIO Drivers
Sonar Platinum 

#1

35 Replies Related Threads

    boredmonkey
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 43
    • Joined: 2011/01/31 12:18:36
    • Location: Abilene,TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/09/29 17:54:35 (permalink)
    Yeah, I posted the first night it sounds better. Some can tell, and others can't ,and might make fun of. *L* I have pretty good monkey ears and listen to Sennheiser headphones. HD580 HD280 Pro

    AMD FX-8320 Eight-core 16 GB RAM, Win 8 64 bit  X2a  GeForce GT 640 Focusrite Scarlett 2i2... My opinions expressed here are my own, and may be wrong, or right when compared to yours.
    #2
    Hansenhaus
    Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1866
    • Joined: 2004/06/29 16:18:03
    • Location: Delray Beach, FL.
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/09/29 17:57:19 (permalink)
    Do a null test with identical mixes from X1 and X2 and see if they cancel out. If they don't, then something has changed. 

    To do this, take the X1 and X2  mixes and place them in Sonar. Reverse the phase of one mix. The sound should pretty much if not all together disappear. The mixes need to be identical in every aspect. 

    Eric Hansen
    My Website 
    Live Videos
    Acoustic Guitar Pickups
     ---------------
    Core i7 2600K
    Intel DP67BG 
    16GB RAM
    RME HDSP9652 (ASIO)
    Windows 10 x64
    Sonar Platinum x64 (English)
     
    #3
    stevec
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11546
    • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
    • Location: Parkesburg, PA
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/09/29 18:10:55 (permalink)
    What you're describing sounds similar to what the Console Emulation does.  Though it would be obvious that it's in the PC strip.
     

    SteveC
    https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
     
    SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
    Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
    Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
     
    #4
    panup
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2538
    • Joined: 2006/05/23 09:34:35
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/09/29 18:15:19 (permalink)
    I made a null test with X1 and X2. Result: 16 bit/44100 Hz mix was perfect silence. Audio Engines of X1 and X2 output do identical mixes.
    #5
    kevinwhitect
    Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 376
    • Joined: 2005/01/15 11:21:04
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/09/29 18:32:33 (permalink)
    As suspected ... just me. :)

    ... still -- it's odd ... I've got pretty good ears, and I'm hearing a difference ... yet, perhaps it may be an individual rig related matter (?) -- for silence speaks volumes.

    All my music is free for download at:  

    KevinWhiteMusic.com

    The Rig:
    i7 950 Processor
    Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R V.2 Mobo
    12G Corsair DDR3 RAM
    OS Drive: Samsung 500G SSD
    Program/Storage Drives: Samsung 500G SSD (x3)
    Windows 10 Pro (Anniversary) x64
    Layla 24/96 on ASIO Drivers
    Sonar Platinum 

    #6
    boredmonkey
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 43
    • Joined: 2011/01/31 12:18:36
    • Location: Abilene,TX
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/09/29 18:51:00 (permalink)
    *pressing boredmonkey joke button* Null test? I don't need no stinkin' null test. hehe J/K I've been having some X2 crashes with projects done in X1. I went ahead and did a clean Windows 7 64bit install to make sure it's not at my end. So I don't have X1 installed anymore to do a null test. Still having crashes which tells me Cakewalk needs Beta testers and stop having their first release the Beta test. I was very forgiving with X1 because it was a major overhaul, but this reeks.

    AMD FX-8320 Eight-core 16 GB RAM, Win 8 64 bit  X2a  GeForce GT 640 Focusrite Scarlett 2i2... My opinions expressed here are my own, and may be wrong, or right when compared to yours.
    #7
    bvideo
    Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 1707
    • Joined: 2006/09/02 22:20:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/09/29 22:54:18 (permalink)
    You could "Do a null test with identical mixes from X1 and X2 and see if they cancel out..." but then everything depends on which version of Sonar you use to do the null test. The silence sounds slightly better in X2. :)
    #8
    djwayne
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2021
    • Joined: 2005/08/07 17:27:09
    • Location: USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 13:44:29 (permalink)
    I'm not sure it sounds any better but it definitely sounds great. Certainly a very top quality sound for sure. No complaints here.
    #9
    Zonno
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 999
    • Joined: 2007/04/11 16:37:33
    • Location: The Netherlands
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 14:45:44 (permalink)
    I am under the impression that X2 is a little bit more gapless than X1.

    Cakewalk, Reason 10, KOMPLETE 11, BIAB 2018, Roland OctaCapture, Finale 26, PCR-300, HP ZBook, Guitars 
    __________________ 
    Any text above is a random collection of characters which bear no meaning whatsoever. The reader will be held liable for any damage due to interpretation of these characters.
    #10
    stevec
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11546
    • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
    • Location: Parkesburg, PA
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 15:25:22 (permalink)
    I am under the impression that X2 is a little bit more gapless than X1.

     
    It definitely seems so here.   Not 100%, but I do get gapping less frequently and when I do they tend to be less obtrusive.   I like that I can drag a synth into the TV without stopping, and only the multi-out versions seem to have a noticeable effect.
     

    SteveC
    https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
     
    SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
    Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
    Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
     
    #11
    bapu
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 86000
    • Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
    • Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 15:30:21 (permalink)
    boredmonkey


    *pressing boredmonkey joke button* Null test? I don't need no stinkin' null test. hehe J/K I've been having some X2 crashes with projects done in X1. I went ahead and did a clean Windows 7 64bit install to make sure it's not at my end. So I don't have X1 installed anymore to do a null test. Still having crashes which tells me Cakewalk needs Beta testers and stop having their first release the Beta test. I was very forgiving with X1 because it was a major overhaul, but this reeks.

    So, you mus somewhere have the last export of an X1 project, right?


    Open that project in X2 and do an export (no differently than you did in X1).


    Now you have the contents of a null test without having to install X1.


    Simples.


    #12
    musicroom
    Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2421
    • Joined: 2004/04/26 22:31:02
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 15:44:39 (permalink)
    I don't null, but I think X2 sounds great. Lately I have so many people repeat what they just said, so I obviously don't have monkey ears.

     
    Dave
    Songs
    ___________________________________
    Desktop: Platinum / RME Multiface II / Purrfect Audio DAW  I7-3770 / 16 GB RAM / Win 10 Pro / Remote Laptop i7 6500U / 12GB RAM /  RME Babyface



     
     
    #13
    slumbermachine
    Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 154
    • Joined: 2012/07/14 21:29:47
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 17:12:49 (permalink)
    When something looks better (X2) it can easily have the psychological effect of sounding better. Now, add the awesome breverb instead of the old cakewalk standby for your reverbs and for sure you just improved the quality, no need to null. Now, cakewalk just needs to give us a super high quality filter (something like frohmage audio quality, but with some cool modulation and multifilter abilities like the now impossible to get Antares filter) and some crazy expensive Lexicon quality delay effects as pro channel built in effects and we have the ultimate studio in X3. By the way, are you DC offsetting those renders, otherwise your null will not be true.
    #14
    g_randybrown
    Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3522
    • Joined: 2003/12/24 11:30:04
    • Location: Las Cruces, NM, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 18:25:23 (permalink)
    Still having crashes which tells me Cakewalk needs Beta testers and stop having their first release the Beta test.



    CW uses many beta testers prior to release and they have for years...that's public knowledge.

    G. Randy Brown 
    Windows 10, 64 bit, Platinum
    Intel Core i7-3770S
    Asus P8Z77-V LK mobo   
    4X8GB Corsair XMS3 memory 
    500 GB Crucial BX100 SSD (OS)
    two WD Black 1 TB HDD
    SAPPHIRE DUAL-X 100314-4L Radeon HD 6970 2GB 256-Bit GDDR5 
    Presonus AudioBox 22VSL
    youtube.com/crystalclearnm
    #15
    cryophonik
    Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4724
    • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
    • Location: Elk Grove, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 18:29:51 (permalink)
    Sounds like every other DAW to me, but I am definitely finding X2 to be more stable and performing much better than X1 was.

    cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

    Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
    Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

    #16
    djwayne
    Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2021
    • Joined: 2005/08/07 17:27:09
    • Location: USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 18:38:24 (permalink)
    Well I just did an A/B test with X2 and the Pro Channel vrs my Windows Media Player...I boosted the low and high end just a little bit with the EQ in Pro Channel, and the difference is outstanding !! Music sounds SOOOO much better thru X2 than the Windows Media Player. I can really hear the acoustic bass and drum brushes on a jazz piece that comes with Windows 7 called "Sleep Away". The difference is NOT subtle.
     
    PC really brings the music to life !!!!

    Don't believe me,  try it yourself. The song is located in your Windows >Libraries> music folder>sample music.  
    #17
    panup
    Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2538
    • Joined: 2006/05/23 09:34:35
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 18:38:42 (permalink)
    > I am under the impression that X2 is a little bit more gapless than X1.

    +1 Same here. More things can be done during playback without dropout.
    #18
    jb101
    Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2946
    • Joined: 2011/12/04 05:26:10
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 18:49:37 (permalink)
    bvideo


    You could "Do a null test with identical mixes from X1 and X2 and see if they cancel out..." but then everything depends on which version of Sonar you use to do the null test. The silence sounds slightly better in X2. :)



     Sonar Platinum
    #19
    Crg
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7719
    • Joined: 2007/11/15 07:59:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 18:57:01 (permalink)
    panup


    I made a null test with X1 and X2. Result: 16 bit/44100 Hz mix was perfect silence. Audio Engines of X1 and X2 output do identical mixes.


    I not sure I understand this null test thing. Wouldn't every setting have to be identical in each track?

    Craig DuBuc
    #20
    cryophonik
    Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 4724
    • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
    • Location: Elk Grove, CA
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 19:06:32 (permalink)
    Crg


    panup


    I made a null test with X1 and X2. Result: 16 bit/44100 Hz mix was perfect silence. Audio Engines of X1 and X2 output do identical mixes.


    I not sure I understand this null test thing. Wouldn't every setting have to be identical in each track?

    Yes, that is the point.  Eliminate (or make identical) all of the variables so that you can isolate and test only the differences between the X1 and X2 engines.  In other words, if everything is identical between a project in X1 and the same project in X2, a null test will reveal whether or not there is a difference that can be attributed to their respective audio engines.

    cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

    Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
    Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

    #21
    Crg
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 7719
    • Joined: 2007/11/15 07:59:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/01 19:10:34 (permalink)
    So... if the default settings in X1 And X2 are different, you would hear something?

    Craig DuBuc
    #22
    Zonno
    Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 999
    • Joined: 2007/04/11 16:37:33
    • Location: The Netherlands
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/02 03:31:23 (permalink)
    panup


    +1 Same here. More things can be done during playback without dropout.
    Yes, that is exactly what I experienced.
    And what Stevec said: When gapping occurs it seems to be less obtrusive. That must mean dropouts are smaller.
     
    The audio engine has improved.

    Cakewalk, Reason 10, KOMPLETE 11, BIAB 2018, Roland OctaCapture, Finale 26, PCR-300, HP ZBook, Guitars 
    __________________ 
    Any text above is a random collection of characters which bear no meaning whatsoever. The reader will be held liable for any damage due to interpretation of these characters.
    #23
    stevec
    Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 11546
    • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
    • Location: Parkesburg, PA
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/02 07:42:16 (permalink)
    Exactly!    They also seem less "sharp", if that makes sense, as though they're somehow softer.
     

    SteveC
    https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
     
    SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
    Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
    Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
     
    #24
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/02 08:15:17 (permalink)
    I agree with everyone saying the audio engine feels more gapless - I was thnking that when doing my first mix in X2. And with the improved workflow I say that I can probably work 20%-40% more efficient in X2 than X1.

    (Sonar Platinum - Win10 x64) - iMac and 13" MacBook - Logic Pro X ++ - UA Apollo Twin DUO - NI Maschine MKII - NI Komplete Kontrol S61 - Novation Nocturne - KRK Rokit 6
    Soundcloud
    Negative Vibe Records
    #25
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/02 08:24:45 (permalink)
    ProjectM


    I agree with everyone saying the audio engine feels more gapless - I was thnking that when doing my first mix in X2. And with the improved workflow I say that I can probably work 20%-40% more efficient in X2 than X1.


    Darn you Project I was just about to post it sounds 20 to 40% better. LOL

    Actually you are not too far off!

    Best
    John
    #26
    ProjectM
    Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 3941
    • Joined: 2004/02/10 09:32:12
    • Location: Norway
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/02 08:30:59 (permalink)
    LOL! Well dunno if it sounds 20-40% better.

    But here's some "math": if I work 20-40% more efficient with the software, in other words faster, if I spend the same amount of time with a project I will add 20-40% more work to it and by that, have a finished track that sounds 20-40% better.

    Yeah I guess it does sound 20-40% better

    (Sonar Platinum - Win10 x64) - iMac and 13" MacBook - Logic Pro X ++ - UA Apollo Twin DUO - NI Maschine MKII - NI Komplete Kontrol S61 - Novation Nocturne - KRK Rokit 6
    Soundcloud
    Negative Vibe Records
    #27
    John
    Forum Host
    • Total Posts : 30467
    • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/02 08:40:16 (permalink)
    Project this may sound weird but I agree with your math. I knew the new math would come in handy some day. 

    Best
    John
    #28
    Chregg
    Max Output Level: -51.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2382
    • Joined: 2010/02/22 06:14:27
    • Location: Perth, Scotland
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/02 08:48:30 (permalink)
    im not convinced with this null test thing, i cant understand how one file can sound better that the other file, rendered in an improved or different engine, and with that improved sound quality, there would be phase differences from the other file, of the exact same source, when doing a null test to see if it cancels out
    #29
    Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
    Cakewalk Staff
    • Total Posts : 6475
    • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
    • Location: Boston, MA, USA
    • Status: offline
    Re:X2 - Improvements to audio engine? 2012/10/02 09:01:31 (permalink)
    There are some major updates/rewrites to the internals and engine that greatly improve realtime operations. The following areas were updated. 

    1. Realtime synth triggering and timing. The mechanism to send realtime events to instruments was reworked to make MIDI timing buffer size independent. Synths can now be triggered with the same timing accuracy irrespective of the audio buffer size. 

    2. Made the following operations fully asynchronous and seamless, minimizing interruptions in audio. (this makes gaps almost imperceptible). Many changes were made to make them more lightweight.

    - Inserting virtual instruments, dragging to create new instruments from browser, also minor improvements for inserting audio plugins. 
    - undo and redo of inserting effects and synths 
    - Unloading and reloading virtual instruments in the rack. This operation can now be done during playback
    - Quick Freeze and unfreeze no longer interrupt audio, so you can actually A/B the results during playback
    - Changing loop points on the timeline doesn't require a gap
    - Audio metronome no longer requires a gap to turn it on or off
    - Preferences dialog can now be opened when browser or groove matrix preview is active (it will stop preview and automatically resume when you close the dialog)

    3. Improvements for operations that require small interruptions in audio playback for re-synchronization. For these we now adopt a new "adaptive smoothing" technique to minimize the perceived effect of the operation. This kicks in whenever any perceivable interruption in audio is detected and subtly smooths out the transition. This makes many edit operations feel seamless now.  
         
    4. Non linear playback engine rework. This component is responsible for all non linear playback of audio and MIDI including events triggered from the browser and Matrix.

    Among hundreds of improvements, a big change was reworking the scheduler, making it synchronous with the audio engine. This makes triggered events from the matrix sample accurate and independent of the audio buffer size.

    5. Previewing events in browser now caches the first 16 events and will avoid reloading them when triggered. This makes auditioning loops seamless.
     

    Noel Borthwick
    Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
    My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1