reza
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 262
- Joined: 2011/02/07 05:07:46
- Location: VANCOUVER,BC
- Status: offline
applying volume automation directly on track?
Hi guys I am wondering if it is possible to apply the volume automation directly right to the track without bouncing it to new track? I mean after volume automation I want to apply the automation on track and get ride of the automation envelope without bouncing to track . like when we want to apply an effect directly to a track and delete the effect from the effect bin with using the apply effect command under process. Thanks
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 16:18:56
(permalink)
I THINK you can do this with Clip Automation (which would now be done in the specific clip's automation lane) then using bounce to clips. Or you could add some effect to the Clip FX bin that is totally benign (as in can be set so there is no actual effect but you can still control output volume) and adjust the volume and then bounce the effects to the clip. It's the whole "Bounce to Clip" thing I am unsure about. I don't know if effects applied in specific lanes or from the FX Bin will actually print to the clip. I think they will. It's just track effects that might need a bounce to track. The smarter dudes can help more but maybe that will point you to the correct manual entries. Cheers.
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 17:01:23
(permalink)
I'm not sure this is possible at all. The question would be - why do you want to get rid of the envelope? If at a later date you want to change it, you can't.
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
mettelus
Max Output Level: -22 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5321
- Joined: 2005/08/05 03:19:25
- Location: Maryland, USA
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 17:59:07
(permalink)
The only times I have ever done that was to bake audio that got used in another project, and was via a track bounce. I do not know of another method but also agree with Jonesey that it is unnecessary in most cases (it does not add undue overhead and visually the ghosted envelope can be hidden if desired).
ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero (Wi-Fi AC), i7-8700k, 16GB RAM, GTX-1070Ti, Win 10 Pro, Saffire PRO 24 DSP, A-300 PRO, plus numerous gadgets and gizmos that make or manipulate sound in some way.
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 18:17:46
(permalink)
I guess if I wanted to save the mix in separate track files so it could be rebuilt elsewhere?
post edited by Keni - 2015/09/04 18:26:19
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 18:18:18
(permalink)
I'm guessing they want to free up the paramater control (which would otherwise be overtaken by the envelope). That's partially why I mentioned finding a plugin of some some that could control volume without using the fader volume for the envelope. I should have done a test using the clip automation before closing Sonar for the night. However... if this isn't possible one thing I've used in the past for a similar scenario is just using Bounce to Track into a new track and dragging the resulting clip into a new take lane in the original track (and of course deleting the newly created track and removing the effect/envelope that I'd just printed... and muting the original take so I could revert back easily if need be).
post edited by Beepster - 2015/09/04 18:27:24
|
reza
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 262
- Joined: 2011/02/07 05:07:46
- Location: VANCOUVER,BC
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 18:20:45
(permalink)
Bristol_Jonesey I'm not sure this is possible at all. The question would be - why do you want to get rid of the envelope? If at a later date you want to change it, you can't.
For those parts that I am 100 percent sure that i won't touch them later, I wanna apply it. So It would be easier for future if i want to increase or decrease the whole track.Otherwise i have to select the whole track to change the volume.
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 18:21:03
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby REZA 2015/09/06 08:20:06
Beepster find...a plugin...that could control volume without using the fader volume for the envelope.
Empty FX Chain
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 18:22:38
(permalink)
That would work Beep but he specifically stated he did not want to bounce to track - and we don't know why.
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 18:22:52
(permalink)
REZA So It would be easier for future if i want to increase or decrease the whole track.
That is the purpose of offset mode.
|
reza
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 262
- Joined: 2011/02/07 05:07:46
- Location: VANCOUVER,BC
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 18:27:59
(permalink)
Beepster I'm guessing they want to free up the paramater control (which would otherwise be overtaken by the envelope). That's partially why I mentioned finding a plugin of some some that could control volume without using the fader volume for the envelope. I should have done a test using the clip automation before closing Sonar for the night. However... if this isn't possible one thing I've used in the past for a similar scenario is just using Bounce to Track into a new track and dragging the resulting clip into a new take lane in the original track (and of course deleting the newly created track and removing the effect/envelope that I'd just printed... and muting the original take so I could revert back easily if need be).
Yes this is what I don't want always for some tracks that i am sure i wont make any change on them. Otherwise as you said i have to bounce them to track and move all the effects or copy them from old track to the new one and delete the old track. I just wanted to check if there is an option that i might don't know it in the sonar platinum.
|
reza
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 262
- Joined: 2011/02/07 05:07:46
- Location: VANCOUVER,BC
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 18:28:16
(permalink)
Thanks for the responds
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 18:48:15
(permalink)
scook
Beepster find...a plugin...that could control volume without using the fader volume for the envelope.
Empty FX Chain
Ah... yeah. That's the way to go. The vid I learned that trick from preceded the FX Chain Modules with the independent input/output controls. REZA... do as scook (and I said) and insert an empty FX Chain module into the Prochannel (wherever it is most advantageous in the signal chain for the volume changes to occur... like at the very end of the PC chain) and automate the output control on the module instead of your volume fader. No need to bounce or do anything at that point. Cheers. PS: Based on my (admittedly limited) experience with Offset Mode it seems to be more confusing/hassle than it's worth but yes, that is of course an option.
post edited by Beepster - 2015/09/04 19:00:23
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 18:54:58
(permalink)
FX chains can go in the FX bin too. Then reassign the volume automation to the FX chain volume.
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 19:01:43
(permalink)
scook FX chains can go in the FX bin too. Then reassign the volume automation to the FX chain volume.
I was unsure if the actual module was available from the FX Bin (which is the only way I know of accessing those in/out controls... but I guess they'd show up in the available envelopes filter menu thingie without opening it). I was PRETTY sure there was a module option for Bin/Rack chains but didn't want to say for sure. I do personal prefer that stuff in the PC though because then I can leave the bin Pre/Post status and contents free for other stuff. Then again the Pre/Post status of the PC comes into play to but I think last in the PC set to default means the FX Chain comes immediately before the fader. Meh... I'll shuddup now. ;-)
|
morganfm71
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 90
- Joined: 2015/08/11 06:41:24
- Location: New York
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 21:44:07
(permalink)
I assign my volume envelopes to the free fader plug "GFader." http://www.gvst.co.uk/gfader.htmThat way I can adjust the overall volume of the track with the normal track fader.
post edited by morganfm71 - 2015/09/04 21:52:25
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 22:06:17
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby morganfm71 2015/09/04 22:17:20
morganfm71 I assign my volume envelopes to the free fader plug "GFader." http://www.gvst.co.uk/gfader.htm That way I can adjust the overall volume of the track with the normal track fader.
Interesting... Did you know that you can do that using offset mode (letter O key) where you can set master levels of all controls even when automation exists...
|
morganfm71
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 90
- Joined: 2015/08/11 06:41:24
- Location: New York
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 22:08:42
(permalink)
I did not know that. I saw it was mentioned earlier in this thread and I will be investigating that later tonight. I may switch to that technique. Thanks for mentioning it.
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/04 22:18:28
(permalink)
Keni offset mode (letter O key)
The keyboard shortcut for Offset mode was dropped in the new SONAR. Toggle Offset mode using the Mix module or add a custom keyboard shortcut.
|
gswitz
Max Output Level: -18.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5694
- Joined: 2007/06/16 07:17:14
- Location: Richmond Virginia USA
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/05 08:36:25
(permalink)
StudioCat > I use Windows 10 and Sonar Platinum. I have a touch screen. I make some videos. This one shows how to do a physical loopback on the RME UCX to get many more equalizer nodes.
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/05 11:52:32
(permalink)
I think I just figured out a way to do this that will print the effect onto the clip in place... but I'm not 100% sure if it will follow any envelopes on the track. If you select a track or clip, go to the global Process menu (at the top of the Sonar scree) and select Apply Effect it allows you to print any effects in the track's effect bin right onto the selected clip(s). So if you just wanted volume you could use any of the methods described in this thread to create a volume envelope using a plugin effect or FX Chain. Then use the Apply Effect option to print the it. You would want to disable any other effects in the bin you don't want to be included in the render (then turn them back on after). Since it's volume and effects tend to react to volume changes you may want to pay close attention to your signal chain/order in which you do this. I'm also unsure if Apply Effect will indeed include any envelope changes to that effect but IMO it SHOULD otherwise that would be a little annoying. Just something to play around with. Now that I've looked at that option I think I'd like to see this feature get a little bit of improvement. Like give more options right in the Apply Effect dialog and generally make it all more robust and user tweakable. It seems to be a reasonable workaround for the limitations/annoyances of the whole Bounce to Clip/Track stuff. I would would much prefer an in place render option for tracks and clips where you can just right click on a clip or track, choose the elements you want printed (like Bounce to Track and Export does) and have the changes applied to the specific clip. I don't why I keep thinking we can already do this but I'm pretty sure it's because of the Process stuff (as in I've seen many of these in place renders happen but via the Process menu). Anyway... I'm sure OP already has his solution but thought it was interesting and might give folks some stuff to play around with. I know I'll be keeping it in my bag of tricks now that I realize it can apply FX Bin stuff. It would be even better if it had an option to include PC and Track strip options (and whatever else might come into play)... and of course an option to include/exlclude any envelopes on the track or maybe even live automation (during an audible real time Apply Effect procedure). Meh.
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/05 12:21:17
(permalink)
morganfm71 I did not know that. I saw it was mentioned earlier in this thread and I will be investigating that later tonight. I may switch to that technique. Thanks for mentioning it.
There may still be some advantages to the method you're using. I don't know. I just thought you'd be interested to know about offset mode... ...and I see from scook's Piet that the shortcut has been changed...? I guess I gavent had need of it for a while but I could have sworn............ Maybe I re-added the shortcut and don't remember?
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/05 12:22:47
(permalink)
scook
Keni offset mode (letter O key)
The keyboard shortcut for Offset mode was dropped in the new SONAR. Toggle Offset mode using the Mix module or add a custom keyboard shortcut.
Thanks for alerting me Steve... Either I've added the shortcut (and don't remember) or I simply gavent used it for a while... I'm gonna look tonight and see...
|
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11546
- Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
- Location: Parkesburg, PA
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/06 10:07:23
(permalink)
Although in the minority, I've been an offset mode fan from day one. Main reason being that it's at the same point in gain structure as the volume envelope itself, so I'm not affecting anything other than pure "volume" without having to go through the selection process to move the entire envelope + nodes.
SteveC https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163 SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors; Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO); Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
|
Anderton
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 14070
- Joined: 2003/11/06 14:02:03
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/06 10:54:04
(permalink)
morganfm71 I assign my volume envelopes to the free fader plug "GFader." http://www.gvst.co.uk/gfader.htm That way I can adjust the overall volume of the track with the normal track fader.
Offset mode simply changes the function of the normal track fader to control static offset instead of fader variations. FYI the reason why the shortcut was taken out was to avoid the "Automation doesn't work! SONAR broken! Faders all stay in the same position!" posts when people hit O by accident.
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/06 12:13:58
(permalink)
<sheesh>...
Yeah, I remember the topic of removing the shortcut now...
But then we should remove all the shortcuts as any could be hit inadvertently and cause unexpected behavior...
Much as I had trouble with the additional activation points for smarttool when x was released... The learning process took a bit more as we had to gain finer control of our actions... They didn't change that (thankfully... I'd rather learn and have the new advantages), but it's not a problem as it's easy to re-instate...
|
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18001
- Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
- Status: offline
Re: applying volume automation directly on track?
2015/09/06 13:27:58
(permalink)
I have often considered setting up shortcut schemes for specific tasks. Essentially remove ALL the shortcuts except the ones I need for a specific project period. A perfect example... I use the keyboard to control transport while recoding (with a guitar strapped to me). I would eliminate EVERYTHING except the necessary transport controls (at least everything that responds to a simple keystroke as opposed to multi key bindings which are no problem). That way I know if I'm recording with my eyes closed and just reaching out to hit the R and Space keys (as I am prone to do) I don't have to worry about screwing something up. Surprisingly though I rarely hit the wrong keys at any time any more and the only one I seem to is the F key which just (albeit annoyingly) triggers the "Fit" command and makes all my track tiny... and that doesn't actually happen when recording... just when I mixing and constantly hitting D to open the Dock.
|