dustin
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 257
- Joined: 2005/03/07 19:51:48
- Status: offline
console RECAL
Could someone explain console RECAL for me?
|
johndale
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3228
- Joined: 2004/03/02 15:11:37
- Location: Red Bluff, California
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/10 04:25:05
(permalink)
Where did you see this at?..........JDW
|
dustin
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 257
- Joined: 2005/03/07 19:51:48
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/10 04:31:00
(permalink)
Just about any high end pro studio console has Recall. As well as automation. Im talking about PRO Neve Consoles
|
DonnyAir
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1201
- Joined: 2004/12/18 16:37:31
- Location: Akron, Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/10 09:56:05
(permalink)
All consoles with automation have a recall function. Not just Neve. Yamaha, Sony, SSL, Mackie, Tascam, Harrison, Soundcraft, MCI, Neotek, LOL.. ..I won't give the whole list. The recall function allows the engineer to reload previous scene or automation settings on the console. Generally, a "scene" includes all your EQ, your fader levels, mutes, pans, etc. for a project. The automation section notes the changes you make to the parameters along the way, and with the help of a "code" (generally SMPTE)eminating from your recording medium (tape, PC, ADAT, DA, etc) remembers those changes at a certain point in time within the code and replicates those changes (fader movements, pan sweeps, mutes, FX, etc etc.). The reason for recall, or at least the main reason, , is that most studios are never working on just one project at a time, hence the need to store multiple scenes and automations. Or, it could be that a project is on-going over a length of time and changes might need to be made down the road somewhere. Storing the scene stores all the settings of that project. Recalling that seen brings all those settings back and allows you to change them, if needed, or, to simply run the mix again without any changes. Some consoles use an on board automation and scene storage, some require an external computer connected to the console. The process differs from desk to desk, but is essentially what is explained above. Did this answer your question? --Donny
|
dustin
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 257
- Joined: 2005/03/07 19:51:48
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/10 12:06:10
(permalink)
Yes for sure. Thank You! Though I was told somewhere that "All consoles with automation have a recall function" is not true.
|
DonnyAir
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1201
- Joined: 2004/12/18 16:37:31
- Location: Akron, Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/10 14:04:46
(permalink)
Though I was told somewhere that "All consoles with automation have a recall function" is not true. Unless it's a much older console using a VCA driven logic which is capable of only one scene or automation function and had no permanent storage capability...every console I ever worked on (and I've lost count..LOL) has always been capable of recalling the scenes or automation either inboard within the mixing desk or outboard if it's driven by an external computer. I supppose that it's possible that in the early days of automation technology, that early versions had no storage capability. If you couldn't store or save the mixes to memory then there would certainly be no recall function. Every automated console I've worked on in the last 10 years has had recall. --Donny
|
dustin
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 257
- Joined: 2005/03/07 19:51:48
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/11 16:27:19
(permalink)
ok now that i have the attention of someone familliar with a console/automation/recall if i want to mix with sonar and a console how do I set it up? music/preamps interface inputs/pc interface outputs/console power amp/monitors Any suggestions on a 24+ Track "begginner" Console that I can get started on?
|
danhazer
Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2053
- Joined: 2004/01/08 17:05:18
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/11 16:58:04
(permalink)
if i want to mix with sonar and a console how do I set it up? Unless you are bent on tactile mixing - I'd say just mix in the box if you are using SONAR. SONAR, course, has total recall of all of your mix parms and stuff. But if you've really decided that mixer is what you want and you don't want to spend a lot of money - I start looking for a (used maybe) TASCAM DM24. It's got motorized faders and all that good stuff and now that TASCAM no longer produces it (make way for the DM32 or whatever they call it), they can be had cheap. Another option would be a Yamaha O1x control surface with mic pres on it. Those are nice. Thanks,
post edited by danhazer - 2005/03/11 17:00:22
|
johndale
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3228
- Joined: 2004/03/02 15:11:37
- Location: Red Bluff, California
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/11 18:22:29
(permalink)
OK, He said RECAL, not RECALL thats what I was wondering. There is something new everyday, so I did not know. In Sonar we have "Snapshots" which is RECALL, use it everyday.................JDW
|
Stich
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
- Total Posts : 873
- Joined: 2003/11/11 15:28:25
- Location: New England
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/11 19:28:04
(permalink)
Isn't RECAL (Not Recall) synonymous with "normalizing the console"? Or more commonly know as "clean up the freakin mess you made" LOL! Stich
|
DonnyAir
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1201
- Joined: 2004/12/18 16:37:31
- Location: Akron, Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/12 14:28:20
(permalink)
LOL...yeah, I suppose there are some desks out there where the "RECAL" might stand for "recalibration", in short, "zero'ing out" the console to where all EQ returns to flat, all faders return to -00-, all aux sends are cleared, etc, but, most consoles with automation allow you to do this anyway by "recalling" a blank "scene". So, it's really 6 in one hand half a dozen in the other. As far as the benfits of using an external console in conjunction with your PC, my question would be, simply, why do you want to? Unless you got a great deal on one of those 30 foot monster boards or someone left a NEVE on your doorstep, most of what you want to accomplish using an automated board can be done internally within the program. I understand that there are still engineers out there who like the actual" feel " of a working control surface, who want to be able to actually tweak a pot (and sometimes I miss it too, ..there's still quite a bit of 'Old School" in this engineer...LOL) but, with the exception of a few scenarios, most of what I want to accomplish, I can do so within the parameters of the software. (BTW..I'm not a Sonar user, I'm a HS user). I have an 02R with flying fader automation, and I do use it, and yes, I do like it alot, but as computer technology grows, at the current rate that it is, I find myself using it less and less. I put serious stock into mics, monitors and room acoustics (no matter what you record to or how you record it, these quotients will never cease to be important) but as far as me missing that 150 ft Neotek Console I used to work on, well, I don't, really. I guess more info would be needed as to what you want to do that you can't do internally. --Donny
|
johndale
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3228
- Joined: 2004/03/02 15:11:37
- Location: Red Bluff, California
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/12 15:35:15
(permalink)
Now that makes sense. Thank you Stich and DonnyAir. I don't have that on my live board or my JL Cooper DAW board, but I've seen it called reset on others. And I've done studio work in large well equiped studios where I've heard the phrase "Zero out the console" and I knew they were scraping a mix. Unfortunatly I have done a lot of studio guitar playing for others where I just laid back did my job, gave them what they wanted and stayed out of the fricken way. I wish I would have paid more attention, but I never knew I would own a toy like I have now, live boards, yes I know my way around well. But I think I will find agreement in the fact studio mixing verus live mixing are two different breeds of the same animal so to speak. So never-the-less, I have holes in my knowledge that I don't relize till I'm in that given situation. So thanks for the help guys. New word of the day "Recal" to reset or zero out the mixing console..............JDW
|
dustin
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 257
- Joined: 2005/03/07 19:51:48
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/13 08:44:15
(permalink)
thats why I was asking. I've learned from all the respones. I just wanted to find out how important the console really is, and how I could incorperate it. But it seems if I need 16 mics to record a full band live of the floor, I can just use two Presonus Digimax Units, and my PC. Im all set
|
DonnyAir
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1201
- Joined: 2004/12/18 16:37:31
- Location: Akron, Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/13 10:23:35
(permalink)
Don't get me wrong, there are times when a console is preferred. If your recording session is extensive enough (orchestral, large band, etc) then, if you didn't have enough stand alone pre's, a console would definitely be of greater benefit; and again, there are engineers who still prefer to work on an actual mixing surface. If you were adept enough at your console, you could do things with your left hand while you did other things with your right hand, LOL, speeding up the process a bit, and depending on the console you were using, the mic pre's might be better as well. All in all, as I've stated previously, technology is moving along at such a break neck speed that you can do things now internally that a few short years ago were nearly impossible, based on processor speed, memory, storage, etc... example: when I first purchased a 2 track editing program (I think it was one of the first versions of SoundForge) back around '94 or so, I was working on a 486 (LOL). I remember adding EQ to a 3 minute song and I received a message back from the computer that my task would take MORE THAN A DAY to accomplish LOL... Well, at that time, it was easier for me to patch the signal through a stand alone EQ and do it externally. Thank God that it's not that way anymore (although, even with the powerhouse PC I have now, I still find myself ****ing if it takes more than a nanosecond LOL)..What it comes down to is that you have more processing power, and hence, more tools at your fingertips within the average DAW these days. If you want to use an external console, that's cool, but I don't see, on a day to day basis where you would really have to. Just a thought... --Donny
|
dustin
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 257
- Joined: 2005/03/07 19:51:48
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/13 10:44:16
(permalink)
Donny,.. What do you think the limits of a computers track record capabilities are (asuming the software allows unlimited tracks) Lets say a damn decent processor 3Ghz or so, and 1GB RAM With all track "input monitor" enabled, how many tracks do you think i could record with 128bit latency settings? What if I already had 8 tracks recorded? How do the Professional ProTools studios do this? thanks again......
|
DonnyAir
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1201
- Joined: 2004/12/18 16:37:31
- Location: Akron, Ohio
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/13 11:48:21
(permalink)
I believe that alll of what you mentioned will most certainly play a part in the number of allowed tracks at once, but also, your interface is just as important. I've never recorded more than 8 at one time (ProTools), so I can only guess that you probably could record more than that at one time if you had, say, a MOTU 16 in or something similar. My days in the trenches at "pro" facilites ended shortly before the full blown ProTools systems came into play as SOP, Up to that point I had been working with 1" and 2" R to R as well as DA's and Adats. Around the time I "retired" (LOL as much as you can fully retire from this biz..) We were certainly using DAW's, but more for 2 track mastering and editing than for full out multi track use. I would be surprised to find out that there would be any "track at once" limitations these days considering the technology available; perhaps other opinions of more "in the know" people on this forum are needed. --Donny
|
johndale
Max Output Level: -43 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3228
- Joined: 2004/03/02 15:11:37
- Location: Red Bluff, California
- Status: offline
RE: console RECAL
2005/03/13 15:40:11
(permalink)
Dustin, There is no track limit (per say) anymore these days. Donny's right it is all done in DAW in MOST state of the art studios these days. I am privy to a coulpe of "Blank Check" studios where they get what they need and the latest without counting pennies. I have a large 32 channel EV/Tapco one of the last boards Greg Mackie did before he forned Mackie in the '90s. Then it was sent to him personally for an upgrade in the new at the time LOUD Technologies faucility outside Woodinville, Wash. I like Donny say's rarely you use this console. Why? Because most people don't understand it and I play guitar and between the console and road case it weighs a ton. It has 4 sub-mixs and the routing possibilities are about endless. See it has quality pre's built in the actual channel strips but I could do a pre or post insert with a seperate pre or processer. I could also run to 4 seperate pres for the 4 subs into my DAW. See where I'm going with this, toooo complicated. So we use a Allen& Heath for live and I use my JL Cooper for studio just run faders,automation,edits and transport. Then my EMU 1820m is my converters and "soundcard". my pre's and outboard proccessing hook into that and I use a seperate Motu micro express 4/6 for MIDI. Also I use a Haffler transana P1000 and Tannoy C6s for monitors which also come off the EMU. As I was saying tho the only timr I would use my big console would be for live recording, other than that it sits in a road case behind my couch. I'll use it at a gig once a month so the pots don't get scratchy (and I don't forget how to operate it) but I tell 'ya when I do that I bring a lunch as it is a all day job. One more thing Pro Tools IMHO really offers no advantage to any of us over Sonar. In fact if anything Sonar is better because it is far easier IMHO to use than PT. All you got to have really is a DSP card or 2 and you have a very powerfull system. If you have access to a computer with Win98 or Millinium go Here and see what I'm talking about. Best of luck Dustin, I think your serious about this because you are asking a lot of the right questions and you relize the exspense involved.......................JDW
|