jBridge instead of BitBridge

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
dolor3s
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6
  • Joined: 2014/12/25 10:38:37
  • Status: offline
2015/01/31 08:57:17 (permalink)
5 (2)

jBridge instead of BitBridge

I use jBridge and find it more reliable, stable and it integrates better with Sonar.
the problem is that when I want to open a 32bit plugin in jBridge I have to manually change settings of each and every plugin because by default it opens in BitBridge. it is a real headache.
can you just get rid of BitBridge and put jBridge instead?
#1

2 Replies Related Threads
    gustabo
    Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 2591
    • Joined: 2009/01/05 17:32:38
    • Status: offline
    Re: jBridge instead of BitBridge 2015/01/31 21:16:10 (permalink)
    +1 (1)
    FYI, If you do a reset and rescan, all the the work that you did to change the BitBridge to jBridge association reverts the 32 bit plugins to open in BitBridge again.


    Cakewalk by Bandlab - Win10 Pro x64 - StudioCat Platinum Studio DAW - 32 GB Ram - MOTU UltraLite-mk3
    M-Audio Keystation 88ES - Akai MPD26 (hot-rodded) - Alesis DM10 - a few guitars, a few amps
    Novation Launch Control - Korg nanoKONTROL2 - PreSonus FaderPort - DAW Remote HD on iPad
    Adam A7X - Behritone C50A
    PreSonus Monitor Station v2 (controlling the mons)
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/sonarusergroup/

    #2
    dolor3s
    Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
    • Total Posts : 6
    • Joined: 2014/12/25 10:38:37
    • Status: offline
    Re: jBridge instead of BitBridge 2015/02/01 06:29:14 (permalink)
    0
    thanks I'll be careful with that 
    #3
    Jump to:
    © 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1