Toddskins
RTA
The dictionary definition of music is 'Rhythmic Noise', so however you get to the end result is valid.
Whatever works for you. The rest is subjective.
That is not the definition, and I groan over what dictionary you chose to nab that falsity from. It's apparent that even dictionary companies are being politicized.
The true definition is: Music - Melody or harmony; any succession of sounds so modulated as to please the ear, or any combination of simultaneous sounds in accordance of harmony. An aesthetic art form of sound produced in a continuum of time consisting of 1) Beat, 2) Rhythm, 3) Melody, and 4) Harmony.
Such a shame that people now think noise is music! It's not.
You might say, in a figure of speech, that some type of news is music to your ears, but that is just a figure of speech. Unfortunately, unschooled people actually believe the brainwashing they have received, and are not able to call things as they are.
Coo. You do have to be careful here, don't you ?
'Noise' (or 'sound') is anything that makes your ear drum vibrate. I think music does that, doesn't it ?
I made no distinction between 'pleasing noise' and any other type of noise as it wasn't relevant in that context.
I don't really believe that my innocent line will make anyone, including myself, believe that music is
just 'noise'.
If I had those powers of persuasion I would have become a politician !
The key part of that was "
Whatever works for you. The rest is subjective."
Although there is science involved, Music [capital 'M'] remains an art, not a science.
I wasn't attempting to define music as simply noise, just paraphrasing in a light hearted way from part of the definition that you provide in great detail. Perhaps I should have said 'Rhythmic Sound' :-)
PS - Frank Zappa, probably my main musical influence by the way, once released an album called 'Make A Jazz Noise Here'. I am happy to be in the company of such 'unschooled people'.