2012/08/14 13:23:39
strikinglyhandsome1
Worth a look http://www.timespace.com/...+2012&utm_medium=email Pricing is interesting compared to Alloy.
2012/08/14 14:24:48
bapu
$79 for me. I've used it a few times. Prolly will get this just to be sure I can be all that I can be.
2012/08/14 16:19:40
Anubis
I don't see anything that compelling to justify $79. Somebody wanna prove me wrong.
2012/08/14 17:27:34
Alegria
Here's some of the changes:

"Izotope"

New Alloy 2

Other Highlights
  • Click less and achieve more with Alloy 2's overhauled interface, completely redesigned and expanded to make more controls more accessible.
  • Easily monitor and tweak the most relevant controls for all active modules in Alloy 2's new Overview Panel.
  • Sidechaining support lets you control the Dynamics module from other tracks in your mix. Affect the whole signal or zero in on just the frequency range you want with advanced multiband sidechaining.
  • Crosschaining allows you to trigger the Dynamics module with another frequency band of the same input source for never-heard-before compression and gating effects.
  • Completely customize your signal routing with two Dynamics stages, sidechain mapping and more.
  • Gain insight for setting controls with visual feedback and metering in every module, including new Gain Trace meters in the Transient Shaper, De-Esser, Limiter, and Dynamics modules.
  • Make your life simpler with powerful workflow tools—the History list lets you go back in time, and the integrated preset editor lets you browse, manage and customize presets easily.
  • Prevents sync problems in hosts like Pro Tools SE with Zero Latency mode.
  • Avoid authorization hassles: choose between easy online authorization, offline challenge-response, or iLok.


  • 2012/08/14 20:41:29
    cecelius2
    So how does Alloy2 compare to Mix Control Pro?  

    I know that Alloy2 is $149 for those of us who do not own Alloy1 and that Mix Control Pro is $49.  I own neither, but have been toying with the idea of getting one or the other just because they have several effects on one plugin and that would make it CPU efficient, or at least easy to have one plugin to do several tasks.  I watched the video by Izotope on Alloy2 and it looked nice, and was enticing.  I have their Ozone(4 not 5) and suspect that Alloy2 will be a quality plugin, but the price is a little steep for non upgrade customers and I did not see a crossgrade option for those who own Ozone(4) for example.   
     
    So, how does Alloy2 ($149) compare to Mix Control Pro ($49) [or even Waves AudioTrack (much older plugin with only three effects for $64.50 at WavesUniverse)]?

    [On edit:---  I just downloaded the Alloy2 demo and tried it out on my office computer (not my studio); it had a rather noticeable CPU hit, more than expected.  My office computer is a little old with an AMD Phenom 955be + 8 gigs of ram, but the cpu hit of Alloy2 was about 5%.  Granted this is not my I72600K studio computer, but I was surprised at the CPU drain.  I will try it on the studio tomorrow and see what kind of CPU hit it has there.  This would not be an issue except that Alloy2 is designed to use on individual tracks and loading up several instances of this might be an issue on a big project.  BTW, I would expect this on a mastering program like Ozone, but not on a channel strip/track plugin.  Can someone check the CPU load of Alloy2 on their computer and see what they get in case it is just my old 955 that is the issue?-----
    Thanks,  Cecelius2]
    2012/08/14 23:22:07
    Anubis
    Here's an in depth video review of Alloy 2 from Groove 3:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW1_oeYI0BQ&feature=player_embedded

    2012/08/14 23:23:12
    LANEY
    I really like the Mix Control Pro and it has very little CPU hit.
    2012/08/15 10:45:29
    Starise
    cecelius2


    So how does Alloy2 compare to Mix Control Pro?  

    I know that Alloy2 is $149 for those of us who do not own Alloy1 and that Mix Control Pro is $49.  I own neither, but have been toying with the idea of getting one or the other just because they have several effects on one plugin and that would make it CPU efficient, or at least easy to have one plugin to do several tasks.  I watched the video by Izotope on Alloy2 and it looked nice, and was enticing.  I have their Ozone(4 not 5) and suspect that Alloy2 will be a quality plugin, but the price is a little steep for non upgrade customers and I did not see a crossgrade option for those who own Ozone(4) for example.   

    So, how does Alloy2 ($149) compare to Mix Control Pro ($49) [or even Waves AudioTrack (much older plugin with only three effects for $64.50 at WavesUniverse)]?

    [On edit:---  I just downloaded the Alloy2 demo and tried it out on my office computer (not my studio); it had a rather noticeable CPU hit, more than expected.  My office computer is a little old with an AMD Phenom 955be + 8 gigs of ram, but the cpu hit of Alloy2 was about 5%.  Granted this is not my I72600K studio computer, but I was surprised at the CPU drain.  I will try it on the studio tomorrow and see what kind of CPU hit it has there.  This would not be an issue except that Alloy2 is designed to use on individual tracks and loading up several instances of this might be an issue on a big project.  BTW, I would expect this on a mastering program like Ozone, but not on a channel strip/track plugin.  Can someone check the CPU load of Alloy2 on their computer and see what they get in case it is just my old 955 that is the issue?-----
    Thanks,  Cecelius2]


     I can confirm a pretty steep cpu hit with the older version of Alloy which surprised me because Alloy was supposed to be the answer to The heavy load that Ozone put on the cpu. I'm sure the load is lighter than Ozone but in some cases Alloy really pulled my machine down. I don't see mention of increased cpu utilization with Alloy 2, maybe I missed it. This would be a big factor in my deciding to upgrade to Alloy 2. 

     Alloy is at least 4 or 5 plugs in one so more cpu isn't surprising but I would like to see it streamlined. I am using the 64 bit plug right now and that doesn't seem to make a difference. Since Alloy is advertised as a plug-in that can be loaded onto multiple tracks. It should deliver in that dept in spades. In my experience it hasn't entirely done that.
    2012/08/15 12:48:19
    Linear Phase
    never mind..   I just demo'd the thing.  I have trouble with these plugins with a zillion options.  When I want a great sounding eq, I just like to dial it up..  on the pro-channel..  I'm uninstalling now...
    12
    © 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

    Use My Existing Forum Account

    Use My Social Media Account