here´s a new test-article to Sonar X2 Producer (in German language): http://recording.de/Magaz..._Producer.html#article

I had some difficulties in understanding some details, but I think that review is very clearly written.

An old joke of mine came to mind:
What's the easiest way to destroy a german book?
Tear off the last two pages, that's where all the verbs are :o)

It seems to be yet another essay that suggests that old time users who were smart enough to understand what a turkey the X - light design is, were somehow "confused" by the new features.

When you begin with a false premise it's pretty easy to miss a lot of details... but it seems that 2-1/2 years later a lot more people have learned to be confused by the X design. A circumstance that the author describes as 

"there have been some changes that are still not perfect or have proven, in practice, for most users to be suboptimal."



I think I am going to see how confusing Studio One 2.5, Pro Tools 11, and Cubase 7 are before I try the latest SONAR stuff again. I still enjoy SONAR 8.5.3 Classic Edition, it can be confusing but it never made me feel dumb just for buying it the way SONAR X did.



best regards,
mike

moonbooter


here´s a new test-article to Sonar X2 Producer (in German language): http://recording.de/Magazin/Testberichte/3039/Update-Test__Cakewalk_Sonar_X2_Producer.html#article

No wonder I can not understand these DAW's ... it's another flippin' language that is not translating into clear words!