In response to pbognar:
I'm due. Just haven't upgraded my computer yet and therefore Sonar. It's been a great build as far as stability. And it's just a hobby and we've been mostly using a tascam msr24.
I've recently done a couple projects in Sonar 7 and it was fine. I got a little frustrated with Cakewalk during Sonar 7, nothing too major but nothings really pulled me in since. I mean there some things about X2 I like. All the soft synth stuff and looping is cool but I've learned I never really use the stuff. Like matrix view looks cool. But I don't really need it. Automation overhaul is welcome and the lanes may be cool.
Comping upgrade is important buy not really sold on the new implementation. I mean for comping you don't need all the features of a track in each lane like automation. Looks more like track folders. Needs to be very simple for comping and that's it. I think it's tacky to mention other software on cake forum but at the same time look at how logic does it.
http://www.youtube.com/wa...e=youtube_gdata_player Extremy simple but yet powerful. Im always asked when comping try this, now go back to the other one. Etc. that is a good comping tool that lets you do that. Plus I've seen in other videos where mouse over plays only that take. Thet is soo much easier than using solo/mute.
Seems like cakewalk doesn't polish off some of thier features lately and pay attention to all the details.
Then there is things like staff view. Seems like we are asking cakewalk too much if they have a feature, especially if they are going to use it in thier advertising, that it be good. Even cakewalk forum members argue against using resources to improve it.
http://www.youtube.com/wa...e=youtube_gdata_player So between this only being a hobby, using the tascam msr24 and not really sure what direction I want to go when I upgrade to a new computer, just haven't found the need to do so.