mixmkr
I always wonder in these threads, why people think the amp sims need to emulate sounds that started 40+ years ago and to continue down that path. With the technology, why aren't people interested in creating something new and unique with these products? Why do they need the VanHalen sound...or the black faced sound...? Albeit those are great sounds, people are getting stuck into staying with the ole tried and true.
Also, why do guitar players feel they need to have the amp *feel* to play properly?
As a guitar player of over 45 years, I'm totally into hearing what the current chop masters can do with an AxeFX, and use it like a new instrument. Unfortunately, it's all this metal, drop tuned stuff or copy versions being played. Pete Thorn is on the right track, but give an AxeFX to a *Jeff Beck* or a modern day Jimi. People don't jump on Jordan Rudass or Lyle Mays for hopping on the Spectrasonics bandwagon. They put some brain power into it.
I think you pose some great questions and you have a great way of thinking. I'll try to answer a few of them based on real life experience as well as what I've heard from others. :)
Why a VH tone or any other classic emulation? Quite a few answers I can give you here.
1. For myself, my answer is I play in a VH tribute band on the side so it's pretty important for me to at least be "in the ballpark". My AxeFx tone that I use on my own stuff isn't ground-breaking or new (though it's new to me) but it sounds nothing like VH.
2. Others in search: Some guys aren't interested in creating or being innovative. One look deep inside an AxeFx unit and if you're not in your 20's, you'll see why you might not be creating anything new and ground-breaking. Anyone with a life that has a family or a demanding job won't find time enough in a day to unleash the possible power this thing has. Thankfully I'm in a situation where I can put in 2-3 hours every few days. I don't have a family and my job is my music and the studio. But even there...it's so loaded with possibilities, my head starts to hurt because of the choices and sometimes I can't make up my mind.
For people that may not be able to spend that amount of time tweaking and testing, it's nice to make noise. It's nice to fire up a preset that sounds and behaves like an amp. Not everyone wants to be creative or experiment to redefine the face of music or even tone really. I personally think it's great to run through presets and say "oh, this sounds like Brian May....this sounds like VH, this sounds like Vai, this sounds like Hendrix, this sounds like SRV".
From there, a user can take the cool elements of those tones and make them their own. And, of course the biggest thing to consider is....you only sound like someone if you put the time in to sound like someone. You don't just get a VH sound and sound like Ed. Everything about your execution needs to be taken into account. I've tried to sound like the dude and still sound like me. The "sound" has more to do with your finger-print tonation than the actual emulated sound.
So, if you look at it that way, none of the emulated "artist" sounds are true other than if the player has a clue as to how to execute something "in the flavor of" <insert name here>
Plug me into Jeff Beck's rig, I'll still sound like me unfortunately. Plug Ted Nugent into EVH's rig (which has been done) and Ted sounded like Ted. Eddie into Ted's rig, he still sounded like Eddie.
The point I'm trying to make...is what I said in the first line in #2 of this post. Some just want sounds they dig...sounds they wished they could have their entire lives when they were learning. I've created several sounds on my AxeFx that are original. Will I be able to use any of them? I don't know...but they sure are trippy. Some happen by accident (which always seem to be the best ones) other happen because you mess around for hours.
3. Metal, drop tuning: It's what's in today as far as "rock" is considered whether we like it or not. Take a look at what is selling these days and what the young concert goers are going to see. I'm 47...I dig classic rock, I dig 80's metal because of some of the killer guitarists....but I'm also embracing what the kids are into today. We had our time, ya know?
What I find more impressive are kids 20 years younger than me able to afford an AxeFx II and the pedalboard for $2900. Add in the Mission Control pedals and whatever else you throw in....and you're over 3k. Whew....that's not counting a power amp or cab. LOL!
As for the feel thing you questioned, this is difficult and you may get 25 different replies. I'll explain it from my personal experience. As I said before, the amp chooses the player. You "feel" something as well as hear something with the right amp. You may notice on the right amp that legato passages are much easier to play because the amp sustains just the right way. This is a "feel" thing and it's important. An amp sim may leave you missing this because there is a difference between "sustain" and "gain".
Natural sustain is super important even if you are not using a high gain sound. Without it, it's much harder to play. When something is much harder to play, the sound as well as your feel changes. Understand? The feel also comes by way of how the tone literally regenerates itself back through the wood of the guitar. You can literally (at least I can) feel tone coming through and back into the instrument. This is important because without it, I have to change how I play. When everything is just right, what you play flows and what you hear, sings to you. If you've not been able to experience any of the above "feel" scenarios, hopefully I've been able to assist you in where you may at least try to look for them. They may not be essential to some, but they are necessities to others.
-Danny