outland144k
First, as Craig said, Gibson killed Sonar
I think you will find that Mr Anderton actually said that 'Gibson
didn't kill SONAR, they just buried it'
The implication being that SONAR/Cakewalk was already dead, Gibson just gave it a burial after keeping it alive for a couple more years, he actually said that Gibson kept it alive for a couple more years than it otherwise would/could have. I think Cakewalk/SONAR has been dead for a long time, in the sense that it has been loosing money since somewhere in the Roland days, if not before.
It's all well and good to blame Gibson for everything (
it seems a very popular thing to do) But the buck has to stop with Cakewalk, whether people want to admit it or not. Cakewalk has been loosing money fro years, even before Gibson. They didn't make a product that was popular or good enough in peoples minds (
outside these insular walls) to make money from it. Take a walk outside this here little bubble and you will see how popular Cakewalk and SONAR really are, there is not a lot of praise for it out there in the real world, and that is not having a go at Cakewalk/SONAR, it's just stating a fact. The fact is that SONAR is generally left out of the conversation when it comes to DAW's, pretty much always has been. 3rd party devs for the most part don't test with SONAR, and therefore historically don't list it in it's '
compatibility lists' or '
tested with' lists, as I'm sure we all know, and as has been testified to by the threads that pop up every now and then complaining about it. You read threads every now and then like "
I'm tired of having to make excuses for using SONAR' it has been a recurring thing over the years.
It's just a fact whether you want to admit it or not, Cakewalk/SONAR just isn't that popular out there, Cakewalk/SONAR have massive reputation issues out in the real world, the world outside this little bubble. SONAR has a lot of issues, and bugs, they may not effect the long time user, as they have learn't long ago how to work around them, and it has become second nature to the point they don't see the bugs. But just because there is a workaround doesn't mean the bugs don't exist. For me in the end, the buck has to stop with Cakewalk, and blaming others seems to be just a part of this '
emotional attachment' thing that is rife here at these forums, the feeling that Cakewalk can do no wrong that seems to pervade this place. Cakewalk was a business, no more no less, it's all about the bottom line, no different to any other business, and to think otherwise is pure folly.
If we were to be honest, and if any of us owned a company that wasn't making any money, instead loosing us money hand over fist year after year, I think in the end we all would have done exactly what Gibson has done.
Roland bought Cakewalk, Cakewalk didn't make money, Gibson bought Cakewalk, Cakewalk didn't make money, can you see a pattern here? how long do you expect this to go on? and why should anyone expect it to go on?