jbow
This guy got up this morning and shot him mother in the face then went to her school and executed the kids in her class. That is VERY personal. I do not pertend to understand it but I know enough to realize that his actions were totally against his mother an everything she loved... he really wanted to hurt her, even after she was dead. There is something much deeper here than any society, culture, music, gun, or game. There was something deep and dark in him regarding his mother.
We will learn more in the next days.
J
You're probably right, but nobody asks about family issues unless the perpetrators are just being brats - aka - no need to be packing heat; yet, I heard that he got his mother during an argument. Which not only touches the family dynamic, but the domestic abuse argument as well. That player for the Chiefs who also took his life and his girlfriend's over an argument and this happened not even a month ago.
But yes, the family issue is only talked about during legal/domestic disputes or when dealing with wayward children/teenagers and unfortunately, young adults. However, you do see how all the stuff on top of the supposed contempt for his mother fits as well. As I said though, with how that is thrown around in the media, but due to it existing in reality. I mean, everybody and his/her mama (no offense) has to be psycho-analyzed.
Everyone has issues, but like you said, if his issues stemmed from something his mother did to him/not do for him, that's one thing, but as often as parents say: "Don't be afraid to come to me for anything," they may now say: "I'm afraid to come to you for anything!" Ironically, perhaps they were afraid to come to you fearing you might go off. (Hopefully, not like the shooter did killing his mother)
It's also said that people are products of their environment. Sure, everyone spoke nice of his mother (of course they are when she's dead); however, no one knows what went on at home (this goes beyond the argument that did her in). She could have been just as violent as he was - her occupation in society means nothing as its just a front really.
So, perhaps she had deep-seeded issues with her son? An argument goes two ways and the same thing always occurs - catch the one retaliating! I bet if she were alive, they'd offer the usual "family counseling."
Again, I agree that it goes deeper than the small issues folks tend to cite often, but there's this societial idea that families don't have problems or they do, but will work them out. Unfortunately, solving such is done in the worst way possible. So, yeah, he really wanted to oust his mother, but who's to say
she didn't wanna oust him? And this goes back to my previous point regarding the gender wars. (Leaving the kids out of this) If he had shot his father, it'd come off as "Oh, he was really wrong, but this is how men solve problems!" and yet the shooter was a guy - only made worse because he shot a woman - yes, his mother, but a woman.
It's that damn "Women and children" first statement! I'm talking generalities not specifics because clearly what happened in CT as well as CO, VA, OR and who knows where else is awful. Ironically, the over-sensationalized case regarding the Anthonys and you heard the same stuff there, too. "They have/had a very strained relationship and perhaps before their child/grandchild died! So, was this heinous act in retaliation?" Oh, the months we had to endure!
Both times we had the raging factor: children. If in the Anthony saga, her child was 26 and not 6 (would've been when she died), no one would give a rat's behind! If "Mrs. CT Teacher" was teaching a class full of high-schoolers/college students (and we've had enough of those shootings as well), there'd be less rage; however, the older classes have parents whom in those above four shootings who've lost children. "No parent should have to deal with the loss of a child (death is not the point). Yes, but "no matter what the child's age," should be included in this statement as well.
Yet, the same stuff has been said about each of the shooters' personalities, demeanors, what they've been exposed to, but
nothing about the family dynamic being the cause of what or how they acted. You mean to tell me that I need to shoot/kill a family member, so the family dynamic issue can be touched as I prefer not to act like a brat which is or should be considered normal. But again, if she were alive, she, as do most parents (and even in media) feel as if they have done wrong by their children if they turn out wayward, but this is
after the fact. She'll never get the chance to regret if she did do something wrong, but neither will he.
I don't think one can separate family from society because either your family becomes your society or society becomes your family. Much like if the parents don't parent their children leaving that up to the media instead (who they ironically and erroneously) blame; yet, you hear where society (because it's shown in media) is telling the parents to do this. (ie: Parents who let their children run all over them and just say "Oh, well," and dare I say children who have deep-seeded issues and are out for blood or when children have more sense with the way they act/carry themselves/speak then their parents)
Families are screwed up these days and society has plenty to do with it. As you said. he got up thinking he'd kill his mother, but his is not the only "child-kills-parent(s)" case out there. The Dahlmer boys ate -- yes
ate theirs, but of course anything to that extreme can certainly blamed on Hollywood. There was also the boy who killed and locked his parents in their bedroom, so he could party! I guess there was no "First Birthday" party for him, but are tons of murderous-holiday movies out there. Perhaps he liked them? No way could he have had issues with his parents. They've got tons of "Unsolved Mysteries" (Title and other likewise shows) about why people "Snap(ped)" and they have done recent events, too. Perhaps this event will be included?
You still don't see how all the above couldn't or didn't contribute to him thinking and doing what he did? Maybe his mother was the root of the problem. What I wanna know is didn't she know or at least sense something was wrong or even acknowledge that he may have been the root of her problem? You know how America loves to swim up and down Denial River!
As I've said before, some methods people use to solve problems are deplorable which is why the uproar regarding the gun laws (and yes, I know there are other means to kill; I've seen plenty of movies); however, this won't solve the problem. It'll just lead to more regs and regs until nothing is allowed to be used. It's like the "political-correctness" garbage - only with objects while it still exists with words.
I thought and still think the whole "What about the children!" cry is garbage because it's taught they have to be shielded from everything and they do not nor should they be! However, after something like this while I haven't changed my mind, I think they do need to be exposed to what we see as adults. I'm shocked there was no uproar when they interviewed the children there and they had more poise than the adults and I'm definitely sure they were scared out of their wits.
As for the issue between Mother and Son, problem solved! It's ashame. but what else can I or anyone else say or do? Yeah, we'll learn more, but it won't surprise me if the same tired reasoning is spewed on top of your "Hatred For Mother Dearest" thought (I think you're right) as people do tend to pull from the top. This is not Jenga! Again, all anybody can do is speculate and assume including the shooter's brother. Maybe his reasoning will be similar to yours, but again if the "broken home" is no reason for someone to act out, then "Hating Family Member Dearest" is no reason either. His mother was just as undeserving of her death as those children and six other adults were, but hey, his mother could defend herself. If so, why is she dead? Everybody heard "teacher" and felt bad because of the children. Had he shot just her, you'd get the "usual" story (which of course, would be alot less unsettling for alot of people)
I actually feel worse for the
mother because I've lost a parent, grandparent and great-grandparent; yet, to have a child/grand/great-grand -- no matter what age -- is just as unthinkable and deplorable. As it relates to the gender wars: children are to women as adults are to men. Adults kill adults, that's just their nature, but adults don't kill children! Children most certainly don't kill adults! That's a lie in both senses. This makes me wanna call Mom and tell her I love her (and I'm 30) which is what needs to be told and more importantly shown to the children more as well as the parents, but especially the children after this happened, even if you have issues with them.