I didn't say the current corportation tax setup was Starbucks fault. They themselves are offering 4% of their turnover as a good-will gesture after seeing the bad publicity might affect their bottom line. A similar percentage might be borne in mind as a minimum for multi-nationals to operate here. It's obviously a reasonable enough figure for Starbucks not to want to pack up and go home as it's a figure they've now volunteered. Likewise I would expect British companies to contribute similarly to the economies they operate in.
I think you'll find the Nissan, Toyota, Honda et al all pay corporation tax currently.
I am blaming the rules as well as those knowingly taking advantage of them when to do so is clearly damaging for all of us that are 'in this together'.
Society currently would think that Joe Bloggs painter and decorator is doing what every 'good bloke' should be doing yet pointing a finger at the single mother pushing a pram purchased through a DSS crisis loan (which she'll have to pay back) in order to pick up her housing benefit. We don't get to hear that Joe Bloggs is actually the childs Father and not doing HIS duty as a parent either.
Yup we all know what the rules are and we also know when we are bending them or taking advantage. Toe rags exist throughout society's different strata they are not all accumulated at the bottom I would say it's likely that the percentage is pretty much constant throughout. Human nature seems pretty much immune to good or bad fortune.
Watch when more and more multi-nationals start to migrate in from the Orient you'll see the rules on corporation taxes change all too quickly then I'll wager.