• Coffee House
  • We apparently cannot discern latency below 80ms
2012/12/01 13:25:49
bapu
2012/12/01 13:27:11
jamesg1213
He's far too irritating to watch, sorry.
2012/12/01 13:30:10
bapu
jamesg1213


He's far too irritating to watch, sorry.

You can always go listen to The Forum Monkeys then mate. 
2012/12/01 13:35:55
jamesg1213
Is it just those two options?
2012/12/01 13:36:58
bapu
jamesg1213


Is it just those two options?

Mooch says the answer is C.

Always C.


2012/12/01 13:45:18
Moshkiae
bapu


jamesg1213


Is it just those two options?

Mooch says the answer is C.

Always C.

That's wrong, isn't it?
 
Whatever happened to Am? It was the only answer!
2012/12/01 15:47:08
bitflipper
"The taller you are the further back in the past you live."

For those who've not met bapu in person, he is above-average in height. Draw your own conclusions.

OTOH, a tall person is always the first to know when it starts raining.
2012/12/01 16:26:22
Jonbouy
But we're sensitive to much smaller latency when it's ADDED to our normal response time.
 
I wonder if people are like interfaces, some have better drivers than others, some are plugged into the PCIe slot while some have to negotiate an internal USB connection, and yet some are just badly implemented and never get updated?
2012/12/01 18:00:16
The Maillard Reaction


I loved it.

Thanks for the link.

I'm glad I'm getting shorter.



best regards,
mike
2012/12/01 18:10:34
SteveStrummerUK
Latency.

The clue's in the name.

Or it would be called (a) Nowency... or maybe (b) Earlency.



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Or (c) I might be talking bollocks
 
 
 
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account