We apparently cannot discern latency below 80ms

2012/12/01 18:30:16

craigb

Bollocksency?

2012/12/01 18:31:44

SteveStrummerUK

craigb

Bollocksency?

Now you're just talking balls.

2012/12/01 18:51:47

Jonbouy

mike_mccue

I loved it.

Thanks for the link.

I'm glad I'm getting shorter.

best regards,
mike

I knew you were gonna say that 160 ms before you did.

2012/12/01 20:53:27

bitflipper

Thanks, bapu, for helping me waste an entire afternoon. My favorite today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QvEpCXzcBI - did you know the voice of the red M&M is Frye?

2012/12/01 21:24:41

bapu

Bit, you're gonna have to actually blame Beagle.

It was his link to the "will we ever run out of music?" vid that got me to post my fav (after wasting a goodly part of the morning).

2012/12/01 21:25:38

Beagle

yep. everyone always blames the dog!

2012/12/01 23:06:20

slartabartfast

"The taller you are the further back in the past you live."

Actually, tall people experience a stubbed toe further in the past. If they are punched in the nose they are about on a par with the rest of us as far as the timeliness of their pain.

2012/12/03 20:01:18

Crg

The difference is whether we are actuating the event or we are being subjected to the event.

2012/12/03 20:04:59

The Maillard Reaction

http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/

2012/12/03 20:10:18

bapu

mike_mccue

http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/

McQ,

You might want to consider smaller fonts as it took me 162ms to read that one.

We apparently cannot discern latency below 80ms

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account