• Techniques
  • This song is mixed well and sounds great
2014/05/04 18:05:23
Rimshot
Sonically, this mix sounds great on my system:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdOXnTbyk0g&list=PLDcnymzs18LXX8I3ERVq0cgWnHE5ARBRc
 
Every instrument is so upfront an clear.  Look how many views!
2014/05/04 21:11:25
teego
Yes it is ! And that is a lot of views..
2014/05/05 11:20:59
bluzdog
teego
Yes it is ! And that is a lot of views..


Yeah but what a view!!!
 
Rocky
2014/05/05 11:24:50
batsbrew
could not understand a word.
 
2014/05/05 16:01:43
bluzdog
Nice cleavage and vintage Mustangs are a universal language.......
 
Rocky
2014/05/05 16:20:41
gustabo
bluzdog
Nice cleavage and vintage Mustangs are a universal language.......
 
Rocky


There was a vintage Mustang in the video? I kept getting distracted by "the view" and kept getting aggravated about the dude getting in the way of "the view"...
 
2014/05/05 17:12:58
Rimshot
I also do not understand the language but I do understand the production, instrumentation, mix and global views.  Over 249 million views on this video!  
2014/05/05 18:08:19
rebel007
Yes, production is A1, both sonically and visually. Something a bit fishy about the song though. I know where Justin Beiber gets his hair styles from now.
2014/05/05 19:14:51
Danny Danzi
Rimshot
Sonically, this mix sounds great on my system:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdOXnTbyk0g&list=PLDcnymzs18LXX8I3ERVq0cgWnHE5ARBRc
 
Every instrument is so upfront an clear.  Look how many views!




3 reasons for this Rimshot:
 
1. An excellent use of the stereo field. You can hear every instrument utilizing a different place via panning. The strings are the atmosphere...so they occupy the harder pans and make it sound full. Everything else is placed where it needs to be in between.
 
2. Lots of compression. One thing I DON'T like about the mix is...it doesn't breathe as much as it *could* in my opinion. Every instrument literally sounds like it's the same volume and there are no dynamics other than the one break section at 1:31 and then at 2:26.
 
The other parts just seem too wide open to me without breathing. They of course used the compression well as there is no pumping or breathing...but it just seems a bit too wide open to me for a song like this. I like dynamics...what can I say. I'm not trying to take anything away from the mix as it is fantastic...but the above is my only small crit really. I just hate it when every instrument sounds like it may have been copied and pasted for perfection and it all sounds too consistent....if that makes any sense? Kinda like when an engineer grabs 3 great snare hits and puts them all over a song. There's no change...it just sounds like everything is too loud and consistent over choosing more dynamics and breathing. The song is way too loud too as far as I'm concerned. It's definitely clean and clear though.
 
3. Really good use of eq. Each instrument is eq'd for the space it occupies. It's not cluttered with sub low end, it has a nice balance of everything. This alone makes a mix stand on its own even if you don't go nuts with a compressor.
 
Really good mix for sure...thanks for sharing. :)
 
-Danny
2014/05/05 20:01:42
Rain
Danny Danzi
 
2. Lots of compression. One thing I DON'T like about the mix is...it doesn't breathe as much as it *could* in my opinion. Every instrument literally sounds like it's the same volume and there are no dynamics other than the one break section at 1:31 and then at 2:26.




This!
 
And it's not that it's uncommon, quite the contrary. Nowadays, everything is shoved against your face and there's no room for you as a listener. Modern productions often feel like having half a dozen dogs humping you all over - 12 seconds in and all I want to do is yell "let go - get off of me".
 
That's what happened with this song, in spite of its qualities.
 
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account