John Wetton is actually my least favorite of the band. I enjoy seeing Downes, Palmer & Howe MUCH more. Wetton is just kind of "along for the ride," IMO. which is pretty pathetic considering he's the "front man." but I love Kansas. even the arrogant full of himself Walsh. personally I couldn't care less about the "commercialism" and "sold out" labels that you or anyone else wants to put on whomever. If I like the music, it doesn't matter if it's a "commercialism sell out" or not. I still listen to Phil Collins sometimes
You mis-interpret my post.
John Wetton's best work was in Family, Roxy Music and King Crimson. A bit weird in Family, but fun nonetheless, and most folks here have never heard those albums, but they were fun, and weird and on occasion ... rather curious! Roxy Music ... was straight ahead bass playing but he's a hired hand. In KC, I think he had more say in it, but in the end, I doubt that he was good for the band or vice versa, though Red and Starless are both magnificent albums, as is Larks Tongues in A**** Without Bapu!
The commercialism I refer to, has nothing to do with someone picking up the money, as Collins did, or Pink Floyd ... it has to do with the music going from free form with its "freedoms" (Rick Wakeman quote!), to just another song with yet another 1 minute solo and yet another bridge/chorus transition, and nothing else ...
I'm in America ... and I have no issues with fasc .... oooooppppsssss .... rich farts that rip you off ... and make sure that you don't get what you deserve ... which in my old country was a bullet, btw, because you could not even say anything and your children would be aprehended with a gun to their heads telling very nicely mind you ... you shut up or the child is gone!
At least in a society like this you and I and Bapu and everyone else has a chance ... in the other examples, you didn't ... !!!
I just don't like the fascist/socialist ideal that a top ten creates, that everything has to be similar and the same ... so you can not be yourself and different ... what do you think that ALL arts' history is about? ... yep! differences!