2012/10/09 15:26:48
spacey
Personally I think all that info is of absolutely no value.

I use an 8 yr old piece of junk to surf internet junk. If I can't wipe it clean
and start over it'll go in the trash.

No reason to put a DAW machine on the internet. Don't need protection from
anybody but it's driver.

Simple. Many other reasons to just make a change. Virus isn't one of them ..to me anyway.
Oh...if I had personal info on one I'd have one specifically for that and nothing else.
2012/10/09 15:41:59
bapu
Beepster forgets to use IETab. Heh Heh.
2012/10/09 15:44:21
Beepster
@rain... I actually wasn't aware of the appreciation but it is certainly mutual. You're a good guy and I always enjoy your posts... plus you're from my favorite country, Quebec. ;-)

Anyway, I totally agree PCs are a pain in the nether regions but to get the same power I have now from a Mac it would have cost me at least twice as much and I've never actually worked on a Mac before... like for anything, so it would be a bit of a learning curve in and of itself. Someday though I'll make the switch but as it is Sonar is currently my DAW of choice and although it works VIA Bootcamp from all reports if something goes wrong it seems like I'd be on my own and I'm not smart enough yet to take that kind of chance.

If I can ever afford Nuendo again though I'd like it to live on a Mac but that is a LOOOOONG time off. Between the software and a proper system I'm guessing about $4000 just to get close to what I have happening now with Sonar (Production Suite) and my home built system which has currently cost me a little over $2000 total including the X2 upgrade.

That brings up a question I meant to ask earlier... why is it exactly that Cakewalk doesn't cater to Mac users? It seems exactly the type of program that the Mac audio market would LOVE.

Anyway, hope all is well in rainworld. Salud.

Also... posted with line breaks for easy reading courtesy of HTML and a touch of OCD. ;-p
2012/10/09 15:46:53
Beepster
@bapu... It's true. And because I've got the guitbox out I'll probably forget again. lol... BTW, YGM.
2012/10/09 19:13:11
Danny Danzi
Beeps: yeah Hijack failed on that thing too. It's a tough one. I'm actually pretty good at this stuff believe it or not. I've been doing the computer thing since 1995 and have never had a virus other than the ones I sort of gave myself when I was messing with the hack and crack stuff years ago. LOL!

Paulo: It's so funny you mentioned that. Honest, I was telling my father that at breakfast! I sincerely believe these companies release these things so you buy their stuff to get it off your system. It's kind of funny how things sort of take turns, ya know? This one thing will come out...and people will post all over "this that this and this failed to even see it, but MegaMal took care of it in under 30 seconds!"

Then next month....the same thing happens with another software name...and so on. I really think it's a credible theory. For example, I've used SuperAntiSpyware for a long time. It's really helped me a lot over the years. I was pretty upset it didn't catch this thing. I knew Norton wouldn't catch it but I thought for sure Super would have. The more I read, the more I heard that this Malwarebytes was cleaning it right up. You get a 14 day trial for it...nearly fully operational. The fact that it did help me get rid of it made me fork out $24.95 just because I felt it was worth $24.95 to have this thing take care of even though I didn't have to pay for it. The free version removed it. But to me, it just seems too coincidental that this particular software was the only one people got results out of other than doing this list of 3000 things some IT dude posted up.

Mesh: Thanks....whew, me too. I never got blue screens and auto-reboots before. I've heard of people getting them over the years, but this is the first time I've ever seen that. I had my Windows disc in hand ready to reformat and loaded in my machine...then decided "let's look this up and see if we may be able to do something less evasive." I'm really glad I did because this little net box is set up perfectly for me. Nothing special...little Dell i3, 4 gig of RAM but it's perfect for the net and doing little service jobs. It was so cheap I bought a few of them.

Uggh....ZUNE! Unfortunately, I'm forced to use that as it's the only software that works for my HTC phone to sync up to my computer. I absolutely hate it and have thought about getting a new cell phone because of it. I dig this phone though and well, I'm not one that lives off a cell like most of my friends. It's more my emegergency life-line when I'm out...which I never am other than my studio. But it won't work there anyway. LOL! The property I own for the studio, has a cell tower 300 yards from the property. We knew we'd get some crap from it, but they pay me well to keep it on the property. So I had a technician come in and totally isolate the studio from cell phone signals so you can't get any signal at all. Every phone says "no service".

I actually love that decision because now clients have to go outside, I don't have to hear their conversations or watch them play with their phones while in the studio. I love new technology...but whew...I hate the whole "live from your cell phone" thing. :)

-Danny
2012/10/09 19:30:45
Crg
There are limitations and inconsistanies in Windows in as much as DAW software isn't a perfect fit. But we must keep in mind that software wouldn't work without hardware. Every computer maker has it's own build of hardware which is supposed to optimize the performance of Windows-software. Faster, more intuitive, (right), All the Windows software makers think they have the best solution, ( wait for the update), the instructions between the hardware builds and software builds sometimes say something different. The same brand of computer, motherboard, etc. can have different builds over a years time, leaving all the software builders scrambling to match up. So..., is it Windows or the the free-for-all occurring between all the software builders and hardware builders?
2012/10/09 20:14:12
D.Triny
Grrr checked in here randomly to see if SONAR was at least rumored to be coming to OSX.  No joy.
2012/10/09 20:21:07
Rain
D.Triny


Grrr checked in here randomly to see if SONAR was at least rumored to be coming to OSX.  No joy.

You know what? As much as I'd like to see Sonar on OSX (I'd buy it in a blink, even if just as a secondary app and/or to open up my old projects), not only do I understand why Cakewalk don't port Sonar to Mac but I actually commend their decision to stick w/ Windows. 
2012/10/09 20:34:38
Linear Phase
Do not go gentle into that new mac
Windows get closed, by a thread out of wack;
Rage, rage against the dying OS X

Though wise Jobs at his end knew Gates no less,
Do not go gentle into that new mac

And PC, Windows, with ware that does crash,
Curse, blue, screen with fierce tears of death, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that new mac 
Rage, rage against the dying of OS X
2012/10/09 21:04:13
Jonbouy
If this wasn't a ubiquitous Mac vs PC thread I reckon that would be classed as poetry LP.
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account