I have been looking at disk cloning software, reading reviews, looking at prices and features. Just trying to learn what is my best option. I have noticed that users seem to think that Acronis 2010 is/was much better than 2012 and IIRC, there is a new 2013 product that also utilized the "Cloud". Frankly, the cloud worries me just a little. I have seen this forum go away a couple of times due to the wind blowing the cloud away. Of course (so far) they have been able to restore everything but I think the first time it took a couple of days... and the Cakewalk forum may not be big potatos, as far as clients go... but compared to them I am an old dried up french fry under the car seat. I am just not sure that if my files disappeared from the "cloud" anyone would ever bother to try to get them back except me... so of course I would never back up to cloud only.
Since I have never used cloning software I feel like I am rolling the dice but if Jim says it is good... I guess I will take that to the bank but I am also going to buy a couple of external SATA drives and an enclosure. My laptop has an e-SATA port. I assume when I finally get to buy a Studiocat it will be able to use the drives too... but still, I don't trust the "cloud". Even the name, the cloud, instills no confidence, not for me anyway.
I read a lot here but I don't comment much because I really have nothing to add but since I have been trying to understand and make a decision on software I thought I would add my 1/2 cent.
What is it that Acronis haas done that has made people not like it as much as they used to? Is it just the same old thing like when Sonar went from 8.5.3 to X1 or the change from XP to W7 to W8... just the run of the mill, "we don't like anything new" thing?
J