mgh
playing devil's advocate here, Jon, but i thought the DAWbench stuff consistently showed SOnar to be one of the weakest in this test, mainly due to its loading onto one core? of course, these aren't real-world tests, but they are interesting, especially showing how much better Win 7 is than OSX for audio. As a Sonar user I am quite happy with how it works for me though, just as I am with my Echo Audiofire despite the same testing proving it is apparently rubbish for low-latency work! lies, damned lies and statistics!
Exactly, aside from the fact that any independent benchmark figures I've seen Sonar comes out pretty well.
It works well for me particularly when I have a project loaded to the gunwhales ready for mixing. It clearly outperforms the other leading DAW I use in that particular role.
Any gripes I have with Sonar are not to do with it's capability of processing digital audio.
The idea of 'an actual digital audio engineer' contributing anything worthwhile when they are not the actual digital audio engineers responsible for the code we end up using are limited if not completely moot.
I'd rather hear of the concerns of those trying to use Sonar for its intended purpose in their productions rather than the geekdom that surrounds this kind of thing anyway. I don't buy a car on the strength that I can pass the time of day with the mechanics discussing the merits of using a particular fuel injection system. I wanna drive the darned thing.