One of the things we have really lost, and are far poorer for it, is the ability to have a civil discussion with someone that maintains a differing point of view.
One might actually learn something from the person with the differing view (or at the least, you will better understand why you maintain your position).
To dare get philosophical for a second or three: When one reads many of the "in" Post-modern deconstructionists and their allies, their ivory tower pronoucements do filter down to ye olde popular culture.
What saddens me, is that since there is no "truth" and language has no real meaning (according to them), lying - called creating "fictive history" - and rhetoric are ok to use in making your points when trying to convince others, as there is little else.
Regarding rhetoric: When describing your "superior" position: The brilliant, innovative scholarship, daring progressive thought, blah, blah, blah...
When describing the other "inferior" position: The poorly thought out, backwards, demeaning and reprehensible views of, blah, blah, blah...
None of this is helpful.
As for periods of non-creativity: they happen, and if I don't write for a period of time, that is ok; there are many other things I can keep busy and productive with.
There was a time when I used to listen to talk radio, but I have long since ceased. There is nothing I can directly do about the situations being discussed, and getting worked into a lather over that stuff was never helpful. Life is much more peaceful, and I am more productive apart from it.