That implies one would know my entire use for it.
I've only given what is relative to this posit.
Speed performance in and of itself as an isolate might be impressive, but it is not the whole process.
Still, no one has offered any information on the correlation of dual chips. And it seems unfair to use any test designed for a single processor only as the benchmark for a pair. Seems to me that a different test is in order and then see how the single stacks up to that. But if we continue to use the same philosophy on something outside of that philosophy we can only find what we chose to find before we started the test.
So what intrigues me the most with these chips are that you can run them pairs and that you have direct memory access eliminating the fsb (or more accurately, that they do that already). Like pcie, this seems to make the case toward direct connections that earlier chips such as the i series lack.
I have a couple of powerful keyboards that run off little embedded Atom CPU's and this tells me, the chip is fundamentally not the problem. They use the Linux kernal though which seems to make it efficient. So while we race for faster pushed to its limits, there is another way that's simpler and more efficient. Seriously, as musicians we're stuck using gamer mentality parts with modified overlayed CAD programs running a kernel designed for banking.
Given these new technologies, it seems like an optimum time to step back out of this box they've put us all in. And if this out of the box view and off the wall questioning can do something, I'm willing to try.