People buy a Les Paul Standard because it's a classic tried/true instrument.
Once you've put on robotic-tuning (which can be flaky)... and change the nut to a brass adjustable piece (which changes string spacing), it's innovative... but no longer the same.
I know our local GC (back in 2015) had to remove the robotic tuning system and put on Grover Locking Tuners to sell their remaining 2015 Les Paul Standards.
It's got to be difficult being a Heritage guitar company.
People buy/love the guitars for what they are... not what they could be (even technical improvements).
I have exactly the same reaction...
Whenever I see Gibson come out with something new/innovative/different, it's somewhat of a turn-off.
That's got to be frustrating... because the company wants to develop/innovate and create new instruments/standards.
Out of many guitars I've owned over the past 12 or so years (took up guitar later in life), two of the very best are Gibson Les Pauls. Are they over-priced? Maybe.
IME, Gibson's best guitars are exceptional.
Manufacturing anything of quality in the U.S. has gotten extremely expensive.
Doesn't matter if you're talking cars, guitars, etc...
It may never happen... but it would be nice to see a renaissance in quality U.S. manufacturing... where top-notch products could be made/sold at reasonable cost. I fear the answer to this dilemma is above my pay grade.
Though guitar may fall somewhat "out of vogue" with younger generations, maybe we're not doing enough to expose kids to the wonders of guitar... and the love of playing an instrument.