• Techniques
  • What does your pedalboard setup include? (p.7)
2013/01/23 09:23:54
dxp
  Apologies for my last post. I made paragraphs but it came out as 1 long block. I tried 'preview' and just got an undefined error message back.. I know the run on sentence thing is annoying to people. Hopefully this post did not turn out that way as well. Mike - The EQ and gain staging point is good. I have never considered that before. Thank You Dave
2013/01/23 09:28:42
dxp
another post with no breaks.
 
Changed browsers.

again, apologies for the visual onslaught.
2013/01/23 09:41:14
wst3
"Tube Screamers and a compressor"


YUP!

When I was in my most recent minimalist phase (about a year ago) I put all the pedals (except the tuner) in a crate.

That lasted exactly one gig! At which point I grabbed the Sparkle Drive - which is a somewhat tame TS clone and a clean boost - and the VTP Orange Crusher, which is my current favorite compressor. These two pedals expand the universe of sounds I can create... a LOT!

Then, as to be expected, I added back the DLS chorus and Foxrox Paradox, and then the RMC Wah, and from there it went up/down-hill.
2013/01/23 12:58:00
Danny Danzi

I had mentioned this earlier or maybe in a different thread, but as I try to get a good gain sound, it just ends up sounding distorted. That is what led me to start this thread. Thinking maybe the 'sound' I'm chasing is more compression than just gain, or at least better achievable thru a certain pedal(s). Even so, with gain adjustments on the amp, the distortion turns to crunch but then lacks power and sustain. I am getting so frustrated that I find myself NOT playing much lately. That's just not a good thing. Not sure about you guys but playing and creating music is what keeps me sane in this world. The balance is shifting so I gotta' get this fixed. I had thought last night that maybe what I should do is post a few samples of my sound to get some feedback from the forum. I don't think I trust my ears at this point so an outside perspective is probably a good thing. Then I read your post and you suggest the same thing. Must be the 'road to resolution'. ha I just need to figure out how to get stuff 'out there'. Never used dropbox or soundcloud or anything so have to figure that out first I guess. Your offer to PM you a wav file is also a good option. I may start there as I figure out how to get stuff to where others can hear and contribute feedback. I've sorta been wanting to do that with a couple songs anyway. Apparently 2013 is going to be 'glutton for punishment'.

 
Ok, let's cover a few more things bro. Just stay patient with me...we'll figure something out. :)
 
Maybe the amp you have isn't the right fit. I definitely don't dig those speakers...so that's going to play a role for sure. Another thing we may need to do here, is you should probably give me a tone from a pro that you like. I'll give you a few examples here that might set you straight.
 
Anything classic rock is usually a tube amp with very little gain in the head and maybe an over drive of sorts. They also achieve their sound from being so loud, the output tubes saturate. Think Angus Young, Jimmy Page (not current Jimmy because he now uses a 5150 lol) and early Eddie Van Halen. Eddie had a little more drive than the others, but without extreme volume or his variac, his amp would fizzle out sustain wise. His pups in that guitar are weak, yet VERY distinctive. But the tone is more a loud amp with just the right amount of drive and of course, the finger tonality.
 
If you like dudes like Randy Rhoads or George Lynch, Satriani or any of the dudes that pretty much created themselves in the 80's, this is a more processed tone that relies on high gain, but also the right compression setting, usually using a pretty stiff 4:1 ratio. What they do is...they jack the gain up and then compress the signal so it tightens up the sound removing the sound of over-gain. You know...when you have so much gain and chug a chord, it sounds like there is no percussiveness within the tone? It just pretty much sounds like a run one sentency of ya ya ya ya ya instead of chump chump. The "C" in chump represents the percussive strike...the P in chump represents the break in between your chugging, understand? Where ya ya ya is pretty continuous and doesn't have a seperated, distinguished break or percussive existence, if you will. I know I'm trying to talk in musical syllables here...but it's the best way I can explain it.
 
So when you compress a ya ya ya ya type tone and get it just right, it removes the exess gain, tightens it up, but takes that excess gain that you don't hear immediately in the sound, and turns it into sustain. The attack and release of the compressor stops the over-gain from happening, yet you still get the sustain effects after when holding notes because the compressor is relaxing a bit more at that point, understand?
 
If you're after modern gain or nu-breed metal etc, most of this in my opinion, is a hybrid of 80's and current tones. The difference is, they are not compressing as much and have amps that really have strong, tight pre-amp sections. The tighter and more gainy your pre-amp section is, the lower you can actually be and maintain a nice tone. This is why amps like the Mesa Dual Rectum Fryer are soo well liked in the modern guitar community. They get insane gain, they do sound good, and the gain you get out of that amp is extremely tight as opposed to the loose gain you would get out of a Marshall or what you seem to be experiencing with your Spyder.
 
That "crunch to mud" type sound where the distortion is not sustaining tells me right off the bat that the amp has a loose gain stage. Someone like AmpFixer could grab that head, and tighten up the gain stage with a custom mod and totally change the voicing of it for the better. You'll see/hear what I mean when you go to Sweetwater and try a few things. Definitely try that Peavey Vyper I've been bragging about. The gain is tight on that and you get gobs of sustain without that sound tripping over itself. It also has some really cool sounding effects in it that I personally didn't have a problem using. But even if you don't like that amp or it's too pricey or whatever, listen to how tight the gain is. Same with a Mesa or even those newer Marshalls that have like 3 channels and 100 knobs on them. LOL! They too have that tighter gain stage geared more for modern rock.
 
So really, the difference between today's high gain sounds vs. say, the 80's stuff I like is...they use either light compressor or no compression with high gain amps and a bit less mid range with a bit more low end accentuated. The 80's processed tones (the good guys at least) had more compression, more verb, and more mids and less bass. Their sounds at times were a bit thinner, but the distortion on most of their tones was a bit tighter due to the compression.
 
That said, the way they recorded guitars back then is a bit different than what they do today. If you recorded Randy Rhoads using his same rig using today's techniques and accepted frequencies that are currently being pushed compared to what was acceptable back then, it would be a totally different ballgame as far as how the sound would convey itself.
 
So keep some of this stuff in mind as it can really help you to get to where you need to be. And yeah, keep the wave file thing in mind or make me an mp3 or something. Also, don't ever consider sharing your stuff to be any punishment. Those that matter will help you. Those that are here to disrupt you and deter you from making any gain, will bash you due to the entertainment factor. The punishment in my opinion, is what you are going through now without any insight. sharing a few files with me or the community will only help you. You have nothing to be ashamed of with your playing or the tone you come up with. Someone in the know or someone that cares, knows what it's like to be in your position and will welcome you and your issues with open arms. At least that's the help and feedback you'll get from me bro. Talk soon. :)
 
-Danny
2013/01/23 14:19:17
dxp
Danny Danzi
 Another thing we may need to do here, is you should probably give me a tone from a pro that you like. I'll give you a few examples here that might set you straight. 
 
 
Ok, I can do that. Don't know all the guitarists names but here is a short list of songs that have the guitar tones I really dig.
 
David Lee Roth (Yankee Rose - A Lil' Ain't Enough)
Whitesnake (Fool For Your Loving)
Disturbed (Indestructable)
Santana (pretty much anything. My #1 influence)
 
so, ya ya ya ya, chump chump chump chump...
 
:)   I'm on board with that.
 People here at work are looking at me funny...
 How can you not say that out loud and tap your toes???
 
damned if it doesn't get the point across tho eh?
 
 
The Peavey Vypyr: A quick look at Sweetwater shows lots of options.
Seems these are not tube amps?
Was there a particular model you were referencing?
 
Let me take a step sideways here and add to the info.
I don't play in a band or even have the opportunity to jam with others very often. The reason I've been thinking 'amp' vs software is basically to get that
sound that comes with the amp/cabinet/mic.
Going back to the sound you got on that new amp modeling software you were involved with, man that was a killer sound.
IDK, maybe for where I am musically that is enough at the end of the day to make it all good again.
I write and record in my home studio and that's about as far as it gets.
A total of maybe 6 people have ever heard what I do.
Still, I want the best sound I can get that exists within the constraints of a limited budget.
Someday when I croak maybe someone will hear my stuff and it might as well sound as good as possible.... lol
 
 
So Danny, thanks man for taking the time. I am learning stuff.
much appreciated.
 
Dave
2013/01/23 16:45:56
michaelhanson
Peavey Vyper Tube 60 is one with a 6L6 Power tubes, I believe.  I have been interested in trying one of these out myself because I have heard several people say they were pretty good. 
2013/01/23 17:36:05
dxp
So it IS a tube amp then?
2013/01/23 17:40:53
SongCraft
For many years I've always kept my pedal array simple; Boss Overdrive + Amp and basically used the Overdrive 'on' for leads and the 'off' position for rhythm. 

Later I got my hands on a Sans Amp; it's pretty good but it died about 5 years later after having been through unmerciful abuse.  May that little beast R.I.P  *lol*  

Since about the mid-1990's I got a ZOOM; and in 2007 the ZOOM G2 series and it still works as new; sure the sounds are on the slightly thin-sounding side of the equation but; often when using an AMP that gives a nice lush, fat sound however in perspective with the mix (considering the style of music I did) guitars require quite a bit of EQ treatment to better fit in with the mix; to allow other instruments especially vocals (including harmony vocals) to cut thru much clearer; of course listening to the AMP'd guitar tracks on their own (solo'ed) may sound thin which reminds me why after all the ZOOM satisfies my needs along with greatly simplifying my setup. 

The other reasons;  ZOOM has a special noise reduction process built-in (option) but unlike other brands and their treatments such as; noise-gates; this ZOOM noise 'reduction' process not only eliminates noise before and after (typical noise gate effect) the ZOOM also eliminates noise 'throughout' without compromising the tone; this has advantages; 'clearer' tone and also in perspective with the overall mix. 

I have always preferred to simplify my personal studio setup; I keep it very lean and that policy extends to sound libraries and effects. By doing this; it cuts down unnecessary expenses and allows me to focus more on the 'song' writing more efficiently.  


2013/01/23 19:08:02
Danny Danzi
dxp


Danny Danzi
 Another thing we may need to do here, is you should probably give me a tone from a pro that you like. I'll give you a few examples here that might set you straight. 
 
 
Ok, I can do that. Don't know all the guitarists names but here is a short list of songs that have the guitar tones I really dig.
 
David Lee Roth (Yankee Rose - A Lil' Ain't Enough)
Whitesnake (Fool For Your Loving)
Disturbed (Indestructable)
Santana (pretty much anything. My #1 influence)
 
so, ya ya ya ya, chump chump chump chump...
 
:)   I'm on board with that.
 People here at work are looking at me funny...
 How can you not say that out loud and tap your toes???
 
damned if it doesn't get the point across tho eh?
 
 
The Peavey Vypyr: A quick look at Sweetwater shows lots of options.
Seems these are not tube amps?
Was there a particular model you were referencing?
 
Let me take a step sideways here and add to the info.
I don't play in a band or even have the opportunity to jam with others very often. The reason I've been thinking 'amp' vs software is basically to get that
sound that comes with the amp/cabinet/mic.
Going back to the sound you got on that new amp modeling software you were involved with, man that was a killer sound.
IDK, maybe for where I am musically that is enough at the end of the day to make it all good again.
I write and record in my home studio and that's about as far as it gets.
A total of maybe 6 people have ever heard what I do.
Still, I want the best sound I can get that exists within the constraints of a limited budget.
Someday when I croak maybe someone will hear my stuff and it might as well sound as good as possible.... lol
 
 
So Danny, thanks man for taking the time. I am learning stuff.
much appreciated.
 
Dave

Ok, a little ain't enough is Jason Becker....that's most likely an ADA Mp1 pre-amp into a cab as that's what Jason was using back then if I'm mot mistaken. It sounds exactly like an Mp1. Up front, in your face, a bit harsh but in a good way.
 
Sykes (Whitesnake) is a Marshall man who often times used a modded Marshall with the HAAS effect (A little delay trick where you have one short delay on one side, (say 2-3 ms) a slightly longer one on the other (say 24 ms) with more "wet delay" to give it the spread sound with just a little dry. So the delay wet to dry ratio might be 80% wet, 20% dry. From there, Sykes added a slight chorus effect on the tone to thicken it up a little at times. When the chorus effect wasn't used, he'd put that HAAS delay at 100% wet so it gave the impression of 2 guitars playing in one pass and spread things out even more. You can't get the sound of the HAAS delay unless you're running in stereo. Other times, he recorded 2 independent guitar tracks of his driven sound without the HAAS or the chorus.
 
Disturbed: no info on this, but to me, a Mesa Dual recto is where I would start. You should be able to dial in this sound in 30 seconds with that amp.
 
Santana: Light to moderate gain tube amp with an overdrive for leads....tone knob all the way off on the guitar using the bridge or neck pup with an amp setting that is warm and chocolatey without harsh highs or too much presence.
 
The Vyper gives you the choice of tube or transistor. The tranny amp ain't half bad, but I much prefered the tube amp due to how it reacted as well as how it gave me those "tube amp only" pinch harmonics you can only get from a good 12AX7 front end. Ever hear Eddie Van Halen do those squeals/chirps that hit you in the heart? Those are actually pinch harmonics and you cannot duplicate those using a transistor rig of any kind. Zakk Wylde...ever hear him do the pinch harms? They come from a tube amp. Totally different sound if you do them on a tranny rig. They don't hit as hard or as dramatic and sound fake and synthetic. All the sounds you mentioned above, you should be able to get with that Vyper without a problem. The gain in that thing is sick...and because it's a modeling amp also, you have a wide array of options in it...with the best part being, it's all tube.
 
Your step sideways: Ok, if you are going more for the software side of things and just want to get a cool recorded sound, there are various options out there for a cheap price. Glad you liked the sound you heard from me. And honest when I tell you, that was a quikie that took me about 2 minutes to come up with for both rhythm and lead. Now that I've had some time to play around with that thing, the tones I have for it now obliterate that in my opinion. That is Acme Bar Gig's "Headcase" which you can check out at www.acmebargig.com
 
There are a few other pieces of software out there that work really well too, but it depends on what type of sound you're looking for.
 
For the "closest to tube sound" from a plug, Head Case from ABG, (above link) Amplitube/Amplitube Metal or Guitar Rig 5 would be my first choices. The TH2 that comes with Sonar X2 is pretty cool too...but pretty limited compared to the full blown version. It's not tubey sounding to me, but still a strong plug with a lot of promise.
 
Revalver MKII is also a good one. Not sure what they have on offer these days, but that's the one I have...it's a few years old but works well. Though I really like the sound of the above plugs, my heart still belongs to my 2101 tube pre-amp.
 
So if you're not really worried about an amp or mic'ing anything up, the above stuff will definitely help you out. Once you get into the whole VST guitar thing, there are loads of impulse cabs you can grab. Some for free, others you can pay for at affordable prices so you'll pretty much have the ability via impulse to use any cab you want and wind up pretty darned close. :) Good luck Dave, hope some of this stuff has been helpful.
 
-Danny
2013/01/23 19:11:50
ampfixer
WOA!

Danny, what do you mean Jimmy is using a 5150. Say it ain't so bro! I've seen pictures of his gear stash and his leftovers are better than a 5150. And I was all geared up to go buy Celebration Day this weekend. 
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account