I'm guessing folks here have had the same procedure so I'd really like to hear from those who've had it done so I can know a bit more and reassure her/tell her what to watch out for/etc.
I'm off in guitarland at the moment but any stories or warnings and the like that accumulate would be appreciated.
A bit of context: She has a good doctor/surgeon it seems (won't go into it but he's done some things that have both her and I pleased with his competency).
Essentially she has gallstones that were blocking up the bile duct(s) to the liver and thus producing bile/gall bladder attacks. They were supposedly saying that they could not do the removal without that blockage being dealt with (whether it remedied itself naturally or not). If the blockage did not clear on its own they were going to put in a stint to clear the liver blockage before the actual removal (which would require two procedures instead of just the one).
At this point it seems she's okay for removal so no stint (but that may change if more stones muck everything up) so next week will likely/hopefully be a straight up removal... otherwise in goes the stint and then the actual removal a couple weeks later.
That's about all the info I have so... well... giv'er down gall bladdery doods/doodettes.
As I said I just want to be able to know more so I can just... IDK... be reassuring/slightly less than useless/know a bit more about what to watch out for because she can be a stubborn old bird but WILL listen to my nagging if I present it in a more... oh geez, uh earthy anecdotal, sciency, medical kind of way.
Cheers.
edited out teh mispeelz and minor brainfarts