• Techniques
  • Contemporary Music Theory - Where To Begin (p.3)
2012/10/09 01:05:28
Linear Phase
There are intervals before triads..  Before that comes the chromatic scale...  440 is not middle C..


The Band19



It all starts here, "A 440" and diverges in both directions. 

1. There are Triads.

2. There are Major and Minor Triads.


I guess you are just joking or what not...  lol..   I dunno....


To all


I am not being pedantic.  I just happen to enjoy music theory.   Go figure..   I'm a musician...  To me its a subject I take quite seriously.  





2012/10/09 01:15:20
The Band19
No it is not middle C, but it is what your tuner is "calibrated to" Your electronic tuner is not calibrated to C? It is calibrated to A400, and you may adjust it from there. I can hum you an a440...
2012/10/09 02:10:30
Rus W
The Band19


It's all geometry... All you have to do is understand the shapes involved, and visualize them. It's all geometry/math in the end.


It's all really geometry and math in the end.  And it repeats "usually" So once you figure out the pattern? You copy and paste it. It repeats, and it's math. 

You know, I had the exact thought thinking about the "chord progression" threads here. Some know about the Circle of Fifths/Fourths, but did you know that's how progressions evolve from very simple to elaborate. Starting off with a triangle (I-IV-V), then a square (I-vi-IV/ii-V) until you get a nice round circle. (4-b7-3-6-2-5-1) It's a semi-circle; however, a circle in the sense you don't change tonalities while the entire scale being used us a nice bonus.


I wonder if there's a correlation to not liking theory because math is involved. Then again, math is one of my favorite subjects. And no, it's not all geometry; some arithematic is involved, too. Scales/Intervals/Rhythms and the like. Of course, there's the science behind it, too and this kind is beyond theory. So, music is language, art, science and math at least. Theory encompasses all of these.
2012/10/09 09:23:17
michaelhanson
Funny that you mentioned the Beatles.  According to some of the biographies, they wrote songs around some chord one of them learned how to play.  That and trying to figure out what Roy Orbison was doing on his records. 

Most of what I like about the Beatles is that they routinely broke the rules just because it sounded cool. 




Exactly!


Did n't "All You Need Is Love" switch back and forth from a 4/4 time to a 3/4 time?  Would something like that have happened if John stuck to theroy?


From what I have read over the years, they would learn new chords and then try to figure out how to insert them into a new song, based on how they sounded.  Even in the recording studio, they broke all of EMI's rules regarding the handling of they equipment. That is actually what I really admired about the Beatles, they did n't conform to the rules.
2012/10/09 10:20:44
Linear Phase
MakeShift

Exactly!


Did n't "All You Need Is Love" switch back and forth from a 4/4 time to a 3/4 time?  Would something like that have happened if John stuck to theroy?


Yes..  Changing time signature had been a part of music theory for several hundred years before John Lennon and the Beatles did it.

 
From what I have read over the years, they would learn new chords and then try to figure out how to insert them into a new song, based on how they sounded.




When John and the Beatles grew up, circa 1940/50s..   Music was still widely taught in Primary and Secondary School.  Everybody back then, knew a little more about music, than they do today.  Music was the first thing cut in public school educations..   The only way to learn it is to self educate.

Furthermore..  When you start playing guitar, you do not know, "every chord right out of the gate."  But I would argue that the Beatles did not subscribe to Classical Music theory..    They subscribed to Blues and Jazz.   Specifically, with the Beatles..  Blues.

Which is the argument, I've been makin, the whole thread...   Blues and Jazz have a theory.  That theory is different from Classical.  Its still theory.  And as much as you want to believe Lennon and McCartney were "lucky, know nothings, with great ears."  That is not the case.  They learned music in Primary School when it was still taught.  Finally, McCartney who is very versed in Blues and Jazz was responsible for writing a lot of those songs...



HAPPY B'DAY JOHN LENNON!!  :-)

2012/10/09 12:33:44
michaelhanson
LP,
I was not implying that the Beatles did not know any theory at all, that they just kind of stumbled into being the greatest contemporary song writers of our time.  They grew in their understanding of music in a natural way that many of us did in those days, as we listened to the radio, learned to play guitar and wrote songs.  They would pick apart the songs they heard and liked on the radio to figure them out.  Their understanding of music grew as they matured.  They would learn chords and chord structures and then experiment with them to see where they could go with them.  Again, what I admired most about them was their ability to experiment, to improvise, and to try new things.  Things like starting a recorded song “I Feel Fine” with the guitar feeding back, which was a first I believe.  Actually a mistake, which John loved and made them keep it in the song.  They were not confined by theory,  but instead, like to push it boundaries.
And actually, to the OP... if you want to learn a lot about contemporay music therory, you could do a lot worse than study the catalogue of these guys. 
Here is an excerpt from a McCartney interview in May at the release of the remasterd Ram CD.   Remember, Paul is in his late 60’s at this time.  He has a life time of learning, but still is very “McCartney-like” in his description of song writing.
 
From the Ram interview:
Talking about the songs you’ve written. There seems to be two types of songs you were writing at the time around RAM, and that probably went on from the late 60s. To me, having had a go at songwriting in my life, there’s the really organic ones, like, as you say ‘Heart of the Country’, and then you’ve got the ones like ‘Uncle Albert’ with the tempo changes and really structured, and really complex things. Do you think you were influenced by the early prog-rock movement, I guess you wouldn’t say RAM was a prog-rock album? Do you think you were influenced by seeing Pink Floyd at the Roundhouse... 

What I take the influence back to was A Teenage Opera. That was a very early record in the late 60s, by Keith West... it was his only, like, big hit. That was episodic, there was a bit and it went 'buh-buh-bum', then it went there, and there, and there [Sir Paul makes some stacking gestures with his hands]. I think that was the first record I heard, and we heard, and we thought ‘that’s interesting’. You can have a song here, then you can cut like a film to another song, and you can even cut the tempo and go slow and so on. That was really the one that was the biggest influence, and then lots of people started doing it. We'd do it a bit, prog-rock did it, Townshend started doing it a bit, The Who opera and all that. I think it was just that one record that made you realize that it didn’t have to be the same tempo or the same key all the way through, you could cut like a film. 

Was that two different ways of writing that you were trying to employ? Because ‘Heart of the Country’ seems to me, as you say, to be something that you just sat down and wrote... 

Yeah, it’s like a little folk country song.

...whereas with other songs you seem it’s so complicated and intricate that it would have to be mapped out. Even something like where you would change the chord on every two beats in the bar on a track like ‘Lovely Rita’ or something like that, and I think it’s one of the hardest things for a writer to do. So many modern songs just change on the beat, and some of the stuff you were doing was so complex...

Yeah, well, you know, I think the thing is, we started, in early rock ‘n’ roll with three chords. We learned those three chords in a number of keys, A, D, E, was the first. Then E, A, B7, which meant you could be in E and do three chords. C, F, G7, but it was always the three chords but in different keys. Then we started to nick C out of its world, the world of C, and put it into the E world, so instead of just E 'dun-dum-dunna', A 'doo-doo-doo', B 'doo-dunna', E. Then you’d go E to A to C or whatever and you’d just see other chords you could stick in. 

So it was a gradual development and you were just learning other chords. Then if there was a song that you wanted to do, that was, really chordy... I was just thinking the other day, I liked the song 'Till There Was You’, I didn’t realise at the time that it was out of a musical called The Music Man, I just heard it as a song and I kinda liked it, so I just learned it. I think have even got the sheet music or something. The chords were quite [shrugs]. This was in F, and you were learning the demented chord or whatever. This was like F demen-ted! And C dee-luded! And E distracted! So there was all these kind of weird little chords that were adding to our armory of where we could go, you know. Like you say, once we got a lot of those then you would even try changing in the middle of a bar and that’s another advance. 

Was that a conscious thing that you were doing while you were writing? 

Yeah, you would just see where you could go with the thing. We never wanted to do the same thing twice. So, you know, even if Ringo would play the same drum kit and beat, for the second song of the day - because we’d usually end up doing four songs a day, in the early days of The Beatles - and we’d say ‘didn’t you just play that snare drum’ he’d go ‘yeah’ and we’d say ‘can’t you hit on the back of a packing case then’. We just didn’t want the same sound on the next record. Whereas now, you’ll get a guy who’ll use the whole of his kit for the whole album, there’s nothing wrong with that, but we were always just trying to make a different sound and see how far we could push it. 

So all of that came into play and on ‘Till There Was You’ there was a guy in Hessy’s, do you remember Hessy’s? 

Yeah, I sure do. I could only afford to buy plectrums there when I was a kid... 

We were the same. 

It’s not there now.
2012/10/09 12:50:55
Linear Phase
@ MakeShift

My bad,

When I said, "you," I wasn't singling out, "you," on a personal level...   That just got lost in translation via, "forum communication, with no facial expression, body language etc."  


Cheers
2012/10/09 13:53:38
tom1
Is the circle of 5ths still a big deal?
 
and Danny how do you hum a chord? :)
 
Just my thoughts on music theory (and I'm college trained) if you're interested in creating something halfway original stop trying to analyze someone else's music.
 
@ SuperStruct: don't mind me, dude.
I have a website: music-lead-sheets.com
on my links page there are some excellent free sites that will give you a good foundation on basic music theory
2012/10/09 14:14:00
michaelhanson
Just my thoughts on music theory (and I'm college trained) if you're interested in creating something halfway original stop trying to analyze someone else's music. 




Or wait a few generations and then rework it into your own.  The kids will never know the difference.  
2012/10/09 14:18:32
Rus W
tom1


Is the circle of 5ths still a big deal?
 
and Danny how do you hum a chord? :)
 
Just my thoughts on music theory (and I'm college trained) if you're interested in creating something halfway original stop trying to analyze someone else's music.
 
@ SuperStruct: don't mind me, dude.
I have a website: music-lead-sheets.com
on my links page there are some excellent free sites that will give you a good foundation on basic music theory

No, it isn't; however, many of us know about the gravitational pull when chords move, Yet, think it's somehow different when we try to get away from it. It's possible, but as far as Western Music, that's how music travels. Now, I know the lament regarding predictability and understanding not wanting to be. Besides, who (other than harmonic analysts - myself included) is listening to that portion as it's the melody that's remembered and sung.


Music is logical, just like math is logical.


I beg to differ with not analyzing anyone else because there would be nothing to inspire you or to aspire to. Tell that to improvisers who quote other works very often. Good composers write. Great composers, steal. (Hopefully, not in the legal sense, of course).


I still agree, but you get into: "I heard this somewhere before." It's in one users signature on this forum, something to the effect of: "Whatever you play, it's been played before." In essence, it's not what is played, but how. That isn't to say that original pieces don't exist, but given the harmonic similarities: "Hey, this sounds like ..." (Axis of Awesome: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pidokakU4I).
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account