+1
But how does one not mask? It's very easy to do - especially when layering instruments.
Yes, the timbres are different, but the ranges (pitch and frequencies) are pretty much identical.
Let's say you write (produce) something for harp and pizzicato strings and you get layering at some point. Since they both occupy the same frequency range (and pitch counts, too).
I've said before while every sound should have its own space, you don't want to end up putting everybody everywhere - or use up every bit of spectrum (stage) space because it available.
This means that the bass will invade the kick's space or the harp will invade the Pizzicato strings space. (As you said "masking of like instruments." It seems like the "like instruments" (layering) part is causing the problem.
Clarity is one thing, but too much clarity is a bad as too much invisibility (mud/masking)
Don't thicken until it's unbearable, but don't thin it out til it's hardly noticeable.
I understand what you're saying, but I hope you understand what I'm asking.
And I do spend alot of time, reducing the masking, but as I said with layered instruments, that is inevitable. (ie: Piano/Strings - chords - (pf) always in mid range.)
EQ and Compresson help, but I have a uneasy feeling that your response will be: "It's the arrangement!" (I've heard this critique often, but this thread is asking about busy/complex mixes)
You wouldn't be wrong, but as with sonic space, don't rack up performer count because the stage is huge; yet, don't do the opposite because you are afraid you'll run out of room.
Not everybody has to play on the floor. Some can play on the ceiling - provided safety precautions were taken. And sometimes you have to play on the ceiling if there's inadequate room to begin with. (Don't do this. I just wanted to keep the metaphor a bit longer).
"We only have room for
one piano. Heh! Good thing, I do a mean trapeze act!"