I heard a few times over the years where people would tell me "dude, you remind me of Yep in some of your posts!" This of course made me say "who is Yep?" When I checked him out and read his posts, I saw him as a knowledgable dude that had to really be into this stuff or studied hard to gain that knowledge. I respect the guy and think it's a shame he's faded somewhat.
That said, there will always be things that get said that we may not agree with. There are quite a few posters on this forum that I think have no business trying to teach others about audio. I can appreciate the effort but let's face it, some just can't pull the wool over our eyes. However, thay HAVE shared other priceless pieces of information that show they know a little about something. You take the stuff that applies to you and ignore the other stuff. When Yep sort of made me disagree with some of the things he said, I stopped reading and went to another part of his post. Some things I thought were brilliant. Other things...just not for me.
I take the same stance as Yoyo on this.
"And there are tons of know-it-alls on the X1 forum who seem to know everything about recording, yet their own work (if they ever bother to post it) is shockingly amateurish. And I mean I was
completely shocked in a few cases. Being not much more than an advanced hobbyist myself (I make a couple bucks here and there), I still would never spout off so much, pick fights over how right I am, and then produce such slapdash crap. It is embarrassing."
This is so true, it actually hurts. That said, there are certain people that have a way of explaining themselves to where I can buy into it. For example, not to single out Drewfx, but I've never heard a single thing he's ever done. However, I would not ignore his advice on anything because he's a good communicator, an intelligent man and you can just tell he knows what he's talking about. His posts are always good, he's never claimed to be a god, he's never pulled an attitude like he knows everything, and he only comments on stuff he truly knows something about.
If I were sharing info in a thread and he came into and said "hey Danny, have you ever tried this that and this for that effect?" If I never heard of it, you better believe I would try it. If a few other guys said the same thing, I'd not give it a second thought unless they were people I held in high regard or those who have shown us examples of their work.
That part, I think Philip has spot on. It's a bit hard to really read novels from people that have never proved themselves in this field. Seriously, that's not meant to sound harsh on anyone, it's just human nature. That doesn't mean a person not sharing their material is less credible...it just means that for some of us, it just may not hold as much weight because they are just talking by example, not leading by SHOWING actual examples. I think we all need that in this field because as I have said a million times before, most of the time you are a better engineer than you know...you just need to be taught how to listen to some things or be taught how to achieve certain things using YOUR gear and YOUR software.
At the end of the day, I've always took what I could from someone trying to help and passed on the things that either didn't make sense, I tried them and they failed, or the subject matter wasn't something that interested me. That's really how you have to go about this stuff. Pick and choose accordingly, try the stuff...if it works, it's credible, if it doesn't, maybe that technique is not for you or maybe the person teaching isn't doing such a good job. It certainly does help if there are actual examples to go along with the text though..make no mistake there.
As for critiquing songs, that's a really hard thing to do for me anymore. I have found my honesty is often times not accepted by the majority, so I only show up in instances where I feel the song poster can handle what I have to say. If I can't be honest and be me, I simply "can't be".
-Danny