• Techniques
  • Paul Frindle-Lets Make Things Even More Confusing!! (p.5)
2012/05/10 02:44:59
BenMMusTech
John T


You don't have to wait for history. You're not a genius. 

But your just ONE man, by what criteria do judge genius would be my first question??, the 2nd would be where is your empirical evidence and what arguments can you assert to back your claim. (note I'm not saying to Mr.T (I pity the fool) I am a genius but these are the first questions that need to be answered when anyone puts forth this kind of assertion forward.
 
If you could see fairy dust and dragons fart, you would still say they did not exsist.
 
Winding up the ever winding road of Neb
2012/05/10 03:15:31
John T
My empirical evidence is your posts all over this forum in which you've failed to grasp even the basics of your chosen field for literally years on end. This, it strikes me, is plenty good enough evidence that we're not faced with a remarkable mind here. 

As it happens, I personally think the ability to become the possessor of a remarkable mind is actually within a lot of people's grasp. I think it's largely a matter of disposition and character; whether you have the temperament and humility to be able to continually revise what you know, refine where you're on the right track, discard where you're not and so on. 

But as I've said already, if you're going to be as determined not to learn, and as unwilling to budge from your preconceived positions as you plainly are, then you're not going to get there. 

To repeat: this thread opens with you referencing Frindle about recording levels for digital. He says the exact opposite of what you think he does. There's a simple issue of reading comprehension to deal with before even getting anywhere near the more esoteric aspects of this. Your problem is that you don't want to do the spade-work; you're lazy, and you're arrogant. This is why you're not much good at engineering. 
2012/05/10 03:31:38
mattplaysguitar
BenMMusTech

But your just ONE man

You're*



Couldn't resist 
2012/05/10 06:11:25
Bristol_Jonesey
The worrying thing about threads of this nature is that newcomers to digital recording are going to end up taking this garbage as gospel and then spend/waste a whole lot of time figuring out why their recordings sound rubbish.
2012/05/10 06:17:07
John T
That's my sole concern yes. If it wasn't for that, I wouldn't bother responding at all. I should probably give up regardless, mind you, for the sake of my own sanity.
2012/05/10 06:39:52
Bristol_Jonesey
Agreed.

Kerplunk, kerplunk, where's my thribble
2012/05/10 07:17:17
trimph1
Is this thread dead yet?



2012/05/10 07:21:09
mattplaysguitar
trimph1


Is this thread dead yet?

It's a zombie thread - it should be dead, every single thing points to it being dead, but for some reason it still walks, trying to eat brains. You can shoot it down numerous times, but it just gets right back up and keeps clawing at your face.
2012/05/10 07:21:47
trimph1
I'm a relative n00b at this digital recording but after doing the silly stuff first I am getting a little better at knowing what is what...and this ain't one of them...
2012/05/10 07:49:29
Chappel
BenMMusTech


John T


The more defining characteristic of a genius is that they tend to reach insightful and correct conclusions faster than others, which is the exact inverse of what you've been doin in this series of threads. This ones actually my favourite. Paul Frindle says the opposite of what you think he does. 

God MrT, I pitty the fool.  I say everything with a dash of salt and pinch of whatever.  It all leads to good fun.  I never said I was a genius, i infered I might be, big difference.  It will be up to history to judge me.
 
Sorry MrT you really have to learn that when you wear your shirt backwards everything comes out forward even poo!!!
 
Neb
Please learn the difference between inferred and implied. Among the many ways you butcher the English language, that is the most annoying.

© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account