mike_mccue
What fairy dust romanticism?
There has been some jousting at windmills in this thread.
:-S
It might have been something to do with thinking that this tuner may be more accurate in terms of precision than any other current one that's working well these days (do some comparitive tests and decide for yourself, don't forget to post the results), if you find one less accurate it is either broken or doesn't do such a good job at filtering out background resonances/frequencies. Then you went on persisting in thinking, due to the Nashville cats, players and producers you kept putting forward that there is some magick involved in slighty detuning from a reference frequency on an instrument which likely has some of it's own individual anomolies especially when played by a particular individual, by use of a preset. (again post the results, it will be more illuminating than any 'me too' assurance from another user as far as seeing what is actually happening goes). I know you are usually a stickler for test results from others.
That may have led someone to thinking you may have lost the plot a little. More than any windmill jousting, whatever that is. If it is what I think it is it has for a long time been a feature and preserve of your very own forum communication style. Maybe someone knocked you off your horse on this occassion? All you need do is come up with the data, IOW apply the same rules to your own conduct as you expect from others.
I'd say the Peterson tool is a particularly good one because it has so many practical and useful features and people seem to enjoy it in use.
So where's my yellow helpful banner thingy? I went to a lot of trouble here specifically for you and all I got in return was being rudely told I was being full of myself.