BenMMusTech
With all respect to Jim Roseberry - who I believe is in the business of building desktops for audio...I've been in this game for almost 20 years, I have 3 degrees in audio and music production and I also have an M.Phil - so a research degree. I'm not trying to sell anyone anything, I'm trying to help culture get over the hump...western culture is stuck in the post postpost blues...and without abandoning knowledge on The Digital from 20 years ago, culture will stay stuck in the post postpost blues.
I've been in this "game" for 30 years.
As an individual, few (if any) have more experience building/configuring/using Digital Audio Workstations.
We sell both custom laptops and desktops. That has nothing to do with my comments.
Numerous of our clients are college music professors.
I could lecture at Ohio State University if I chose to do so.
Many of our clients have won Emmy's, Grammy's, and performed in front of hundreds of thousands.
The reality is that, due to the laws of physics (thermodynamics), a laptop is not the equal of a fast desktop.
Mobile CPUs were created specifically to keep heat in-check in tight enclosures.
There's no arguing that Performance Throttling is a positive thing in a high-performance application (Digital Audio Workstation, Video NLE, etc).
Case-in-point, the new i9-9900k was just released.
It'll happily run all 8 cores (16 processing threads) locked at 5GHz... and do so running near dead-silent.
Prerequisites:
- proper cooling (won't fit within the confines of a laptop shell)
- access to all necessary BIOS parameters
You absolutely can not do this with ANY current laptop (including the best custom built models using Clevo shells).
There's simply too much heat for the small space.
Most off-the-shelf machines do not expose all BIOS parameters necessary to fully optimize a machine for maximum DAW performance. This is done to prevent less tech-savvy users from fouling up their machine.
This isn't my opinion, it's the reality of what Dell, HP, etc release... and the reality of those companies trying to keep their tech-support load under control. The machines are "dumbed-down". Apple has been moving this direction the past decade (no user-serviceable upgrades/expansion).
The general-purpose user (Facebook, Office apps, Email, Photos - to which most laptops are marketed) is much more concerned with long battery-life than absolute maximum performance.
Extended battery-life means performance throttling/compromise.
If you need the ability to go mobile, the performance compromise may well be worth it to you/your scenario.
But... a machine that uses a Mobil CPU, C-States, Enhanced Intel Speed Step, etc... is a performance compromise.
For those wanting to push the limits at the smallest ASIO buffer sizes, performance/speed are important.
ie: With an audio interface like the Presonus Quantum, you can now do things like run Helix Native (software plugin version of Helix guitar processor) at 96k with 1ms total round-trip latency.
Using a 32-sample ASIO buffer size at 96k, the machine has ~0.3ms to process/fill the next ASIO buffer... or you'll hear a drop-out/glitch. This type of thing isn't possible with an off-the-shelf laptop; that's not what they were designed to do. With a custom desktop, you have complete control over the parts/configuration... which allows pushing performance boundaries much further.