2017/06/07 11:40:17
Wibbles
sharke
I don't mind the Daily Mail.



You should.
 
Rationalwiki provides a fairly good summation: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daily_Mail
 
 
2017/06/07 13:15:08
sharke
Wibbles
sharke
I don't mind the Daily Mail.



You should.
 
Rationalwiki provides a fairly good summation: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daily_Mail
 
 


Meh, for a site that calls itself "rational wiki" it sure piles on the histrionics.
2017/06/07 13:52:38
Bhav
Wibbles
sharke
I don't mind the Daily Mail.



You should.
 
Rationalwiki provides a fairly good summation: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daily_Mail
 




Sorry but that 'article' is bullcrap and mostly just a senseless rant.
 
There is nothing inherently right or wrong about any media outlet, freedom of information is a great thing.
 
The only problem is when people take anything that they read in any newspaper to be 100% literal, especially when it comes to articles that are intended as the writer's opinion on the topic.
 
Of course all newspapers are going to try and be sensationalist, overexaggerate things to the extreme and have a political agenda, be it right, left, centre, up, down ... this is literally their purpose. But most people realize, or at least should to take certain things they read with a grain of salt.  
 
And currently at least when it comes to the biggest topics such as the recent terror attacks, they do have one thing right that the biggest problem with tackling terrorism is the apologist far leftists that keep on accusing any opposition to terrorism as being racist.
2017/06/07 14:44:21
craigb
Don't believe everything you read on the Internet!

 
~Moses
12
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account