abacab

kitekrazy1
Under the big labels most likely your releases went through Pro Tools no matter what DAW was used to make it. 
 
BTW my favorite newsletter is the one from Pro Tools.  Great newsletter.

Yup, and I'm willing to bet when Joe went into the studio with the hired orchestra to record the final version of the score for "Mission Impossible", that they tracked it on Pro Tools.

I think so too. Pro tools seems to be the number one choice for mastering. Some ppl think buying pro tools puts them on the same level as professional engineers when the truth is pro engineers don't have out the box pro tools, they have 35k-65k worth of hardware and plug ins with their pro tools.

kitekrazy1

Calazzus
I watch a lot of videos on YouTube. I watch vst product demos, orchestral film/tv scoring, and beat making videos. I don't think I have seen one yet where Sonar is being used. For film scoring it's Cubase, Logic, Ableton, Pro tools even FL studio. For beat making videos it's all of the above, Reason and Studio one. I NEVER see videos with Sonar in them except Sonar tutorials. Does anyone have any idea why Sonar isn't as visible?

 Search Beatscape on Youtube.  Too bad they ditched the best REX VI out there.  Reason's OctoRex was no match. The only DAW where I had to work with scoring that was easy and stable was Studio One.  I could care less to ever do that kind of work again.
 
  Does it matter?  Some go through esteem issues when it comes to their choice of DAW.  I see this with FL users despite winning the most popular DAW in Music Radar just about every year. 
 
  I often wonder if endorsements really carry that far in the software industry.

Those videos are ancient. Sonar 8?