I have an Apple tower that was produced a few weeks before the cutoff date after which the computer could not go past the Lion OS. There is absolutely no
technical reason why the computer can't run a 64-bit operating system, and there are relatively simple hacks to make it happen. Apple could sell a $200 update kit and it would have a really nice profit margin. But they make a
better profit margin if I buy a new computer.
I have a dual G5 that works just fine, but I can't even surf the internet with it because too many sites say "we don't support your browser" and there are no updated browsers.
A motherboard got fried on one of my Windows machines after a nearby lightning strike. The computer was two years old. The only possible way to get a replacement motherboard was finding someone selling a used one on eBay.
Anyone with a Venom synth? A great synth. When inMusic bought M-Audio, they abandoned it and just prior to inMusic buying M-Audio, M-Audio made a firmware change so the last editor program - which is
essential for Venom - no longer worked. The company that wrote the editor couldn't afford to write a new one for free.
Ask Pro Tools users whatever happened to their investment in RTAS and TDM plug-ins. And good luck finding an LCD replacement screen for any one of a number of devices.
That VS-20 delivered unprecedented value compared to what it would have taken to create the same results only a few years before.
People are more than happy to enjoy the upside of technological advancements, but then expect that there is no downside to a rapid rate of technological change. There is. You either grow up and accept it, or don't use high-tech gear.
Do I
like it that things become unsupported? Of course not. This is why I advise people to consider any purchase of tech gear as something to be amortized over a period of time, because it
will have a finite life span. Anyone who is not aware of that has not been paying attention.