I would opine that there would be little difference in sound quality between the two and even compared to the Soundcraft. Unless you had all three in one place and did a detailed blind test you cannot really make such statements that one mixer is a lot better than the other. Mixers are a lot better today than they used to be.
Both are good but I see the Yamaha has got more channels, compressors built in which could be handy and effects. It seems to offer more all round. The Mackie will do the job too and will have a very transparent sound.
I use a Samson mixer to mix the analog sigals in my studio and I have found from experience that the effects are handy and can be very useful at times. The compressors could also be handy for taming a wild synth or something before it goes into your DAW. I think maybe look at the features and decide which one would better work for you. The sound from both of them is going to be good enough for what you are wanting to do.
Given what
Cactus has said though the Yamaha maybe the better option. They have always been pretty consistent in their construction and reliablity.
Just out of interest the Samson that I use is this one and I cannot recommend it highly enough.
http://www.samsontech.com/samson/products/mixers/mdr-series/mdr1688/It has got 16 inputs, 8 Mic Pres and 4 stereo line inputs. It seems to match all my input sources beautifully. The EQ on the Mic channels is slightly different to the line inputs too. (both EQ's very versatile) The HPF works very well. It is ultra quiet, has a very musical sound and the effects are excellent. It is solid and well built. Nice small footprint too. One of the reasons I got mine. It had to fit on top of a half rack.
It would be a cheaper option but you may want something slightly bigger and in that case the Yamaha would be a good fit. I got it for around $300 here in Australia. (180 pounds in your speak) The shop you refer to only seems to have the 12 channel version but you could ask them about the 16 channel model.