• Software
  • Countdown to the future of RHYTHM (p.3)
2017/03/02 02:18:10
abacab
LOL!!!
2017/03/02 03:03:59
synkrotron
Looks and sounds nice but at that price I think I'll stick with what I've got...
2017/03/02 03:53:12
Fleer
At $199 it's a lot cheaper than what Spectrasonics is still charging for their RMX dinosaur.
2017/03/02 08:44:38
JClosed
True, but Stylus RMX has the timedesigner that I use extensively. I do not see something similar in this program at the first glance.
 
I can be missing it though. I will have to take a closer look.
2017/03/02 14:57:10
Michael A.D.
The biggest problem for me is that it does not let you use your own loops/samples. 
If they can give me that capability then I would probably buy it, otherwise I will pass for now.
2017/03/02 23:58:41
Fleer
Kontakt sadly does not allow you to do that, so third party developers can't either.
I'm not missing this, as Rhythmology's loops are manifold and ooze quality.
2017/03/03 20:46:52
Michael A.D.
You bring up a good point about Kontakt, but there are ways around that limitation.  There are some Kontakt programs that let you use your own samples but you have to play a game of renaming your samples to match what the program is expecting - for instance WAV01 might be a standard name so you could rename your file to match that name.  So it's a bit of a PITA, but it could be done.
 
But you might be right - there may be enough variety in the Rhythmology built-in loops to make it worthwhile. 
I guess I will wait to read a few reviews and see what folks think.  
2017/03/03 21:53:30
Glyn Barnes
Something as cheap and simple as Hollow Sun's GUI Shell for Kontakt allows users to load their own samples without renaming.
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account