Kylotan
This is opinion. I've never seen anywhere outside of this thread claim that there's some sort of standard cut-off point for the ratio beyond which compression ceases to be compression and becomes limiting.
Yes, that was my reaction as well.
The important thing is that limiting is extreme compression done with the intent of keeping audio below a certain level. A 'limiter' is a compressor that is especially suited to this task.
This. When limiting you work towards containing or "limiting" the output of a given track regardless of the ratio or speed constants used in the process (though a high ratio and fast attack would certainly be more effective in most cases).
The term "compression" on the other hand applies to the use of dynamic range reduction towards lot's of different goals like soundshaping, enhancement, distortion and sustain along with making the soft parts louder.
Another example: If you use a 1176 or Distressor with the "all-buttons-in" or "Nuke" modes respectively to completely squash a snare drum, would you say what you did was put a limiter on there? To use the term limiter in this instance does not sound right to me.
CJ
Google it if you do not believe me and READ any kind of book on the subject.
I have read dozens of books and articles on this subject, and I don't recall any of them give such an arbitrary ratio value where compression suddenly becomes limiting.
Can you please post a link that contains this definition?
Sven