• SONAR
  • How "good" is Sonar X3s QuadCurve EQ compared to others? (p.4)
2014/06/13 06:40:11
Kev999
sharke
I think you should be able to insert as many instances of the EQ as you need. Using multiple EQ's in a chain is quite common and it's a shame that you're tied to using a 3rd party alternative if you need more than one...



Not strictly necessary to use third-party. There's the Sonitus EQ.
 
2014/06/13 07:29:05
EricDeluxe
markyzno
Anderton
 
 
I would like to see improvements in the spectrum analyzer - brightness control, peak/average switch, and hold. 




 
Amen to that, a peak hold would be amazing.


And perhaps a Hz/Key indicator;)


2014/06/13 10:33:33
Del
Kev999
sharke
I think you should be able to insert as many instances of the EQ as you need. Using multiple EQ's in a chain is quite common and it's a shame that you're tied to using a 3rd party alternative if you need more than one...



Not strictly necessary to use third-party. There's the Sonitus EQ.
 


The Sonitus EQ is a very good EQ!
2014/06/13 13:16:04
Anderton
ErikDeluxe
Still alive this thread is Yoda says;)
 
I often hear that the Waves SSL EQs are used for Master Bus and in Mastering. Also Pulsetec EQ-types.
I guess you can use the Quadcurve EQ as well...
 
However, is the Quadcurve EQ built upon some analog gear like the Console Emulator, Softtube Saturation Knob or the PC4K S-Type Channel Compressor?
PS - also would like to have the ability to insert several EQs expect 3rd party VST</p>




I'm pretty sure the E and G EQs model the SSL E and G-series consoles. The Pure sounds kind of Pultec-ish. Note sure where the Hybrid comes from.
 
You can always send to a bus and use its EQ to get another six stages of EQ (four parametric and the HP/LP filters). Or use the Sonitus.
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account