@Jaymz...
 
Hey, dood. I calls 'em like I seez 'em. Yer chops are top tier.
 
Cheers.

Beepster
 
It makes the forum look ridiculous.

Yet a 1,835 page thread full of absolutely nothing informative, entertaining, useful, or remotely sensible doesn't?
 
In fact I could probably post a lengthy list of posts and threads that "make(s) the forum look ridiculous", none of which anyone seems to be in the slightest bit bothered about. And I should know, I posted quite a fair bit of it.
 
I know two wrongs don't make a who cares, but this guy isn't that bad in comparison. I know you told me before that he's trolled a lot using many different accounts, but surely the obvious response is just to ignore him?
 
 

SteveStrummerUK

Beepster
 
It makes the forum look ridiculous.

Yet a 1,835 page thread full of absolutely nothing informative, entertaining, useful, or remotely sensible doesn't?
 
 
 
 

No! I won't have it! I posted about Arthur Wellesley, The Duke of Wellington somewhere in there!

SuperMarioGamer

Beepster
Let's not and you go away.

If there were a poor person in some other area of the world, he/she had little food, and could not get music lessons, but still had the desire to make music, then if there were people coming up to him/her and criticizing his/her music as awful, then that is unfair and unjust.  This poor person cannot meet the rich man's standard (the professional standard) for good music.  He/she instead has to meet the poor man's standard since he/she does not have internet, technology, etc.
 
That is why I think it would be both cruel and unfair if anyone of you here put down this child/person's music.  I realize that I have the internet, am learning music lessons, etc.  But everything I just said here is to simply illustrate my point that it is demeaning of an individual's talent for you to go only by the "rich man's standard" in judging someone else's skill/talent.  You should lower your standards as a means of respecting and acknowledging the works of art and talent that an individual truly possesses.

aaaand this is where I take literal offense to your idiocy.
 
I am the guy who will (and has) dedicated his time and energy teaching music to, what society, would consider total lost causes. I believe music can get guns and hard drugs out of people's hands and replaced by guitars, basses, drumsticks, whatever. I believe it can soothe and heal the troubled and damaged minds of the world.
 
Your stupid schtick mocks everything I and others try to do to use music as a positive force in the world to ease desperation and mental illness.
 
Go suck a pile of [REDACTED] you garbage troll threadsh*tter.
 
BAN THIS IDIOT!
 

Don't start in on me, Strummy. You know full well what the difference is.
 
 

SuperMarioGamer

Beepster
Let's not and you go away.

If there were a poor person in some other area of the world, he/she had little food, and could not get music lessons, but still had the desire to make music, then if there were people coming up to him/her and criticizing his/her music as awful, then that is unfair and unjust.  This poor person cannot meet the rich man's standard (the professional standard) for good music.  He/she instead has to meet the poor man's standard since he/she does not have internet, technology, etc.
 
That is why I think it would be both cruel and unfair if anyone of you here put down this child/person's music.  I realize that I have the internet, am learning music lessons, etc.  But everything I just said here is to simply illustrate my point that it is demeaning of an individual's talent for you to go only by the "rich man's standard" in judging someone else's skill/talent.  You should lower your standards as a means of respecting and acknowledging the works of art and talent that an individual truly possesses.

You haven't made any music. 

Beepster

SuperMarioGamer

Beepster
Let's not and you go away.

If there were a poor person in some other area of the world, he/she had little food, and could not get music lessons, but still had the desire to make music, then if there were people coming up to him/her and criticizing his/her music as awful, then that is unfair and unjust.  This poor person cannot meet the rich man's standard (the professional standard) for good music.  He/she instead has to meet the poor man's standard since he/she does not have internet, technology, etc.
 
That is why I think it would be both cruel and unfair if anyone of you here put down this child/person's music.  I realize that I have the internet, am learning music lessons, etc.  But everything I just said here is to simply illustrate my point that it is demeaning of an individual's talent for you to go only by the "rich man's standard" in judging someone else's skill/talent.  You should lower your standards as a means of respecting and acknowledging the works of art and talent that an individual truly possesses.

aaaand this is where I take literal offense to your idiocy.
 
I am the guy who will (and has) dedicated his time and energy teaching music to, what society, would consider total lost causes. I believe music can get guns and hard drugs out of people's hands and replaced by guitars, basses, drumsticks, whatever. I believe it can soothe and heal the troubled and damaged minds of the world.
 
Your stupid schtick mocks everything I and others try to do to use music as a positive force in the world to ease desperation and mental illness.
 
Go suck a pile of [REDACTED] you garbage troll threadsh*tter.
 
BAN THIS IDIOT!
 

I just think that everyone has a talent to some degree regardless of how awful they are.  So if an average child who plays with toys sings an awful voice, then that is a talent.  However, it is a talent a very low level.  It is a very low level talent, but still a talent worth praising and worth acknowledging as a work of art.

SuperMarioGamer
I just think that everyone has a talent to some degree regardless of how awful they are.  So if an average child who plays with toys sings an awful voice, then that is a talent.  However, it is a talent a very low level.  It is a very low level talent, but still a talent worth praising and worth acknowledging as a work of art.

 

Beepster

SuperMarioGamer
I just think that everyone has a talent to some degree regardless of how awful they are.  So if an average child who plays with toys sings an awful voice, then that is a talent.  However, it is a talent a very low level.  It is a very low level talent, but still a talent worth praising and worth acknowledging as a work of art.

 

Let me judge the authenticity of your criticisms regarding my voices.  Here is another voice I sang into the mic.  Go ahead and tell me what you think of it.  It is my absolute final voice:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQznRqoDr28